Mike Pompeo Meets S Jaishankar

India, US Discuss Difference Over Trade

India and the US on Wednesday acknowledged that there were issues between the two countries on bilateral trade and committed themselves to removing differences between them.

Speaking to the media after talks with the visiting US Secretary of State Mike Pompeo, External Affairs Minister S. Jaishankar said both the countries should take “constructive and pragmatic view” on the issues pertaining to trade between them.

“On outstanding issues, particularly relating to trade, that we take a constructive and pragmatic view of that. It is natural that when you have trade, then there will be trade issues. The real test of our intention is our ability to address them effectively.” he said.

Jaishankar asserted that India is committed to making business easier between the two countries.

“As far as business is concerned We are committed to making it easier to provide level playing field to grow with the world economy and striking a right balance between their concern is what we are trying to do,” said Jaishankar.

India had imposed retaliatory tariffs on 25 American goods, less than two weeks after US President Donald Trump announced an end to preferential trade treatment for India over the trade barriers.

Last year, India had announced tariffs in retaliation to higher US import duties on steel and aluminium.

Asserting that great friends are bound to have disagreements, Pompeo, in his remarks, said that Washington and New Delhi need to solve trade issues as there are millions of opportunity before the two countries.

“Great friends are bound to have disagreements and the US has been quite clear with its demand of greater market access and today I addressed these differences in the spirit of friendship to remove trade barriers and open economy. The two countries will be able to see a good outcome for each other,”

“I’ve never found a partner, ally, no matter how close, where we didn’t have places where we’ve to work through things. We have endeavoured to make sure that our countries can provide security for ourselves, want India to be able to do that too,” he added.

The two leaders discussed a host of issues including terrorism and the Asia Pacific during lunch hosted by Jaishankar for his counterpart.

“We discussed a number of bilateral and global issues, on terrorism, I took the opportunity to express our appreciation for the strong support that we have received from the Trump administration, what we say is really zero tolerance for cross border terrorism,” Jaishankar said.

In a veiled reference to China on Indo-Pacific issues, the Indian minister said said that India is not working against any country but looking for peace, security, stability, and prosperity.

“Indo-Pacific is not against something but for somebody. That something is peace, security, stability and prosperity we are really looking.”

Pompeo also reiterated that India and the US have solidified their common vision for free and open Indo-Pacific. We have grown cooperation in energy, space and other areas.”

The meeting between Jaishankar and Pompeo, the first high-level engagement between India and the US after Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s reelection, was also to the stage for the meeting between Modi and US President Donald Trump on the sidelines of G-20 Summit in Osaka later this week.

(ANI)

]]>

Assam Citizen Register Excludes 1L People

Ahead of July deadline, the Assam government on Wednesday published a list of names of over one lakh people who have been excluded from the draft National Register of Citizens published last year.

The additional exclusion list, published as per provisions contained in Clause 5 of the Schedule of The Citizenship (Registration of Citizens and Issue of National Identity Cards) Rules, 2003, contains names of 1,02,462 persons.

The persons named in the exclusion list are the persons or whose descendants were found to be Declared Foreigner (DF) or Doubtful Voter (DV) or whose cases were pending at Foreigners Tribunals after publishing of draft NRC.

The list also includes names of people who were found ineligible while appearing as witness in hearings held for disposal of claims and objections. The list, however, does include the results of claimants, who appeared for hearings held for disposal of claims and objections during the period of 15th February 2019 to 26th June 2019 and their results will be appearing in the final NRC.

Additionally, people who were found to be ineligible during the process of verification carried out by the Local Registrars of Citizens Registration (LRCRs) under provisions of Clause 4(3), after the publication of Complete Draft NRC on 30th July, 2018 have also been included in the exclusion list.

Letters of Information containing the reason of exclusion is being sent to the excluded persons at their residential address. They will also be getting an opportunity to file their claims which will be simultaneously disposed of through a hearing and the Letters of Information will be containing the details of the venue of the claim cum submissions hearing.

The date of hearings will be published on the NRC website and are scheduled to start from 5th July. The results of these hearings will be taken into account in final NRC.

The final National Register of Citizens will be published on 31st July 2019.

(ANI)

]]>
Modi IN Parliament

Modi Seeks Oppn Backing For Talaq Bill

Prime Minister Narendra Modi on Tuesday unleashed a strong attack on Congress president Rahul Gandhi and UPA chairperson Sonia Gandhi stating that the government had not put them behind bars since it was not the Emergency, while calling upon the opposition party to support the BJP government’s efforts towards women empowerment in the form of Triple Talaq bill.

Outlining his government’s commitment to make the country strong, prosperous and inclusive, Modi in his reply in the Lok Sabha to the motion of thanks to the President’s Address to the joint sitting of the two houses of parliament, called upon all opposition parties to “rise above political boundaries to create a new and modern India”.

He cited former Prime Minister Jawaharlal Nehru to emphasise on duties and not merely rights and said: “there was need of a paradigm shift of moving from rights to duties”. He said it was also the duty of public representatives to create “public awareness” on the issue.

He invoked the Emergency of 1975 and said people had returned his government to power after testing it for the past five years.

Modi sought to distinguish the work culture of BJP from other parties, saying that the party stays away from negativity and believes in “drawing a bigger line” rather than erasing the line of its rivals.

Modi rejected Congress allegations that it was targeting Sonia Gandhi and Rahul Gandhi.

Referring to speech of Congress leader Adhir Ranjan Chowdhury who had accused Modi government of making allegations against top leaders to defame them and challenged it to arrest UPA Chairperson Sonia Gandhi and President Rahul Gandhi, Modi said his government was being criticised for “not putting (people) to jail”.

He said the country was not under Emergency and due process of law will be followed while continuing the attack on corruption.

“If you get bail, enjoy it,” he said in a veiled reference to Rahul Gandhi and Sonia Gandhi.

Modi also accused the Congress leadership of not thinking “beyond family” and that only a few contributed to the national progress.

Challenging the Congress, he asked if it had praised late Prime Minister Atal Bihari Vajpayee before 2004 or till 2014. “You did not praise Narasimha Rao, was the name of former Prime Minister Manmohan Singh taken during the debate. They do not think outside the family,” he said.

“There are some people who feel only a few names contributed to national progress. They only want to hear those few names and ignore the others. We think differently, we feel each and every citizen has worked for India’s progress,” he said.

“You are riding high. I congratulate you. You can’t see properly from a height, people on the ground look small. We do not believe in being on a high. We believe in connecting with the grassroots,” he said.

He also used the anniversary of the imposition of Emergency to attack the Congress, saying it had killed the soul of the nation.

Referring to the Triple Talaq Bill, he said Congress can make up for two “missed opportunities” on the issue of women empowerment in the past.

“They first missed in 1950s when Uniform Civil Code was being debated and then after 35 years when Shah Bano case came up. Now is the third chance when they can support Triple Talaq Bill.

“There are reports that a Congress minister had said at the time when Shah Bano case was being debated in the country that ‘upliftment of Muslims is not the responsibility of the Congress, if they want to lie in gutter, let them be’,” Modi said and added that the members of the main minority community need to made part of country’s progress.

He targeted Congress over its criticism of `Make in India’ initiative, and said that China exports arms while India was world’s biggest arms importer.

Modi said the President’s Address is the voice of how the government will fulfill the aspirations of common people.

“Where do we want to take the country, how we intend to take it, what will be the priorities, we have tried to present a roadmap. “The great men of the country saw a dream of a powerful, prosperous, inclusive India. The demand of time, the expectation of people is that we do this with determination and with greater speed. In today’s global atmosphere, India should not lose this opportunity. We can remove all obstacles to meet the aspirations,” he said.

ANI

]]>
US Secretary Of State In India

US Secy Mike Pompeo Arrives In India

United States Secretary of States, Michael Pompeo, arrived in India late on Tuesday for his first high-level engagement with Prime Minister Narendra Modi-led NDA regime after Lok Sabha elections.

Pompeo will meet External Affairs Minister S Jaishankar on Wednesday when issues relating to oil imports from Iran and the S-400 missile deal with Russia are expected to come up.

The three-day visit of Pompeo comes amidst rising tensions between the US and Iran over fresh sanctions imposed on Tehran, an issue which is likely to come up for discussion between the two sides on Wednesday.

Following fresh US sanctions, Indian oil companies are also facing a tough time and many have reportedly stopped importing oil from Iran. Government sources, however, say that India will take any decision on the issue keeping its energy security and national interest in mind.

Diplomatic sources said there is no structured agenda and New Delhi is expected to urge for de-escalation of tensions between Washington and Tehran. They said there could be a discussion on the situation in the Persian Gulf region, which has a big Indian diaspora. (ANI)

]]>
BJP Panel On Post Poll Violence IN West Bengal

BJP Panel Submits Bengal Violence Report

A BJP delegation on Tuesday submitted its report to party’s national president and Union Home Minister Amit Shah on the alleged killing of its workers and violence in Bhatpara in North 24 Parganas district in West Bengal.

The delegation was led by BJP Member of Parliament (MP) SS Ahluwalia and comprised of Satya Pal Singh and Vishnu Dayal Ram.

A three-member delegation led by Ahluwalia on June 22 arrived in Bhatpara in the wake of violent clashes between the BJP and TMC in the state.

Amid tight security, the three BJP leaders did a recee of the area, amid chants of ‘Jai Shri Ram.’

This came after two people were killed and several others were injured on June 20 after clashes broke out between two groups suspected to be affiliated to ruling TMC and the BJP in Bhatpara, which comes under the Barrackpore Lok Sabha constituency.

During the violence, the two groups hurled crude bombs at each other and gunshots were also fired. In response, police resorted to firing teargas shells to bring the situation under control.

Section 144 of the CrPC, which prohibits the assembly of more than four people, was promulgated in Bhatpara and Jagatdal police station areas to restore order in the localities.

Both TMC and BJP have blamed each other for the incident. (ANI)

]]>
Chennai Cafes

‘You Can’t Wash Hands In Chennai Cafes’

Aishwarya Sunder, 25, an automobile engineer, says things have come to such a pass in Chennai that one doesn’t expect a running tap at restaurants, what to say about using the washroom. And she sees darker days ahead.

Chennai summers are unbearably hot and they are turning hotter with each passing year. Water has always been a problem in Chennai, but this year the metro city is grappling with its most severe crisis. I used to live in the heart of the city (Crumpet) earlier but recently shifted to the outskirts. I am happy I did so.

For, the water supply in the outskirts is far, far better than inside the city. Maybe the credit should go to the society administration for ensuring that the resident don’t suffer. My current housing society lies in an SEZ (Special Economic Zone) where water is conserved by way of rain-water harvesting and other means. There are more trees here as well. And, most important, people take care to not waste water despite no imminent acute shortage.

A couple of days ago, I went to a friend’s birthday party at a restaurant in Chennai downtown and found there was no water in the taps to wash one’s hands with. That led me to think how do they access the water they use for cooking? If they have to buy bottled water to cook, then wouldn’t that lead to price rise soon? Also, what if someone wants to use the washroom? There are reports that the hospitality industry has been hit badly by the water shortage and I wonder how hotels are managing the water crisis. And summers aren’t just a few months’ long affair in Chennai; it is only around December that it rains in Chennai properly and the temperatures go down.

ALSO READ: Hurtling Towards A Dystopian Urban Crisis

The Cauvery water dispute which had been raging for years was finally sorted last year but the result was that Karnataka was allocated more water than before. I see it as one of the main reasons for the water shortage apart from the obvious fact that the city received, as per reports, 62% lesser rains than in 2017. Water at Chennai’s Porur lake has also reached its lowest level.

For many years, we have relied on tankers for water supply. It is not simple to rely on tankers. First of all, one has to be available to receive the water. Then, the tankers don’t always arrive on time. Next, there is no guarantee that the water will be clean. People can’t even use ROs (water purifiers) to cleanse the water directly from tankers. More, one has to shell out anything between ₹1,000-1,500 per person per month. Do the maths and you will realize what a heavy burden it is on the pocket.

Last, but not the least, infections and water-related health issues are common. So, we have to depend on about 30 litres of mineral water bottles every month and there’s no guarantee that they will always be easily available.

We are hearing stories from our friends working in the IT Sector as to how they are being asked to work from home since their offices aren’t able to handle the water shortage. I work in the automobile sector, and so far we haven’t been asked to work from home. However, the swimming pool in our office has been closed down and there is regular office advisory to use water judiciously.

It is high time our city, state and country woke up to the environmental crisis we are facing. This crisis has been long in the making and the solutions will take time too. However, now everyone needs to stop the blame game and contribute to the best of their capacity to restore the city’s ailing water supply system. It can be something as small as taking bath using buckets and not showers because then one can regulate how much water one has used or washing vegetables in utensils rather than under a running tap. After all boond boond se sagar banta hai (many a trickle makes a mickle).

Mayawati Ends BSP Alliance With SP

Blaming the post-poll conduct of the Samajwadi Party (SP), BSP chief Mayawati on Monday announced breaking of the alliance with SP in all future elections, marking the end of a brief coming together of the two in the Lok Sabha elections.

Making a terse announcement in a tweet, she referred to the bitter past between the two parties, an apparent reference to the Guest House incident in the mid-90s when Mayawati was attacked by SP men, she said she had forgotten old issues and concerns before tying up for the recent Lok Sabha polls.

“However, the conduct of SP after the Lok Sabha elections forces BSP to think whether it is possible to defeat the BJP by joining hands with the SP. It is not possible. Hence in the interest of the party and the movement, the BSP in future would contest every big and small election on its own,” Mayawati said in the tweet.

The latest development came a day after Mayawati chaired a meeting with her party office bearers, members, legislators and parliamentarians to chalk out the strategy for the upcoming by-election to 11 Assembly seats in Uttar Pradesh.

“It is well known the BSP had forgotten all issues and concerns it had with the SP. We sidelined our concerns about anti-Dalit and anti-BSP decisions of SP in 2012-17, the anti-reservation stance of SP and deteriorating law and situation under the SP rule just for the larger interest of the public and has respected the alliance dharma,” tweeted Mayawati on Monday.

Shortly after the conclusion of the Lok Sabha polls, Mayawati claimed that the SP’s voters did not support the alliance in the Lok Sabha elections. She had then announced that her party would fight the 11 Assembly by-elections in Uttar Pradesh alone. However, she had also said that this was not a “permanent break” from her alliance with the SP.

The BSP and the SP contested 38 parliamentary seats each out of 80 seats. However, the BSP could only secure 10 and SP 5 seats (ANI)

]]>
RBI Slaps ₹3 Crore Penalty On AmazonPay

RBI Deputy Guv Viral Acharya Quits

Reserve Bank of India (RBI) Deputy Governor Viral Acharya resigned six months before the scheduled end of his term, reports said on Monday, adding that Acharya will return to the New York University. 

Acharya took up his post on January 20, 2017 for a term of three years. He is the central bank’s youngest deputy governor post-economic liberalisation. His tenure was to end on January 20, 2020.

Reports speculated that Acharya will return to the New York University as CV Starr Professor of Economics.

During his tenure, Acharya advocated for RBI’s independence, saying that if the government does not respect its autonomy, it will incur the wrath of financial markets.

His resignation comes in the backdrop of economic growth slowing to 5.8 per cent in the fourth quarter of 2018-19. It also comes ahead of the Union Budget 2019-20 in the Parliament on July 5.

In December last year, Urjit Patel had stepped down from the post of RBI governor following differences with the government.

(ANI)

]]>

'I Was Thrashed And Given Talaq For dowry'

Akhtari was married to Rizwan in 2015. When her husband could not find work, he asked Akhtari to arrange money for a taxi. Soon the heated arguments turned into brutal physical torture. When her brother tried to sort out the matters with elders’ help, things only went worse. Akhtari’s in-laws locked her in a room without food and water for days as punishment. They also told Rizwan that if he divorced her, they will get him a new wife and dowry. Akhtari was kicked out of the house with her one-year old in arms. She waited outside the house, begged her husband to let her in. But it didn’t happen. She is enraged at how women in Indian families are treated like dirt. She wants justice and has approached UP Police:   I belong to Meerut district in Uttar Pradesh. My parents fixed my marriage in 2015 when I was 24. I was told that my prospective husband worked as a chhota doctor in Delhi. My family believed that he was probably a Unani medicine practitioners or maybe an assistant to a doctor. My parents felt lucky for me and spent beyond their reach on the marriage and dowry. But when I moved to Delhi with my husband, Rizwan, I found that he drove a taxi. He told me there was more money in this ‘business’ and soon he will be running a fleet of taxis. I didn’t believe his words but accepted it as my fate. Less than two years after the marriage, Rizwan shifted back to Meerut since he was barely able to make two ends meet in Delhi. I was pregnant at that time. Unable to find any work in Meerut, Rizwan began pressing me to arrange money and a car for him so that he could runs his own taxi in Meerut. Every time I told him that my family was unable to meet these demands because my father was no more, there will be heated arguments and he would beat me with fists. His mother, father and brother, instead of intervening, further incited him to punish me. They had little concern for my condition. I gave birth to a girl child in 2017 and my brother and sister-in-law came to visit me. When they saw the bruises on my body and heard about the torture I had suffered, they tried to reason with Rizwan. After several rounds of talks, when my brother realized Rizwan was not going to budge, he agreed to arrange the money for the vehicle. This cooled down things for several months. But, when my brother was unable to arrange the promised money, thing went from bad to worse. My in-laws told Rizwan that if he divorced me they would find him a girl which will bring enough dowry for a car. When I countered them, they locked in a room for days without food and ensured that I was could not speak to my family. They probably wanted to starve me to death. But with some outside help, I managed to convey my condition to my brother, who immediately arrived at our home with some relatives. The elders in both the families sat together and decided that the matter must be settled within the confines of family and there should be no domestic violence. It had an adverse impact on Rizwan. My beatings only increased and got more brutal. On July 18, there was another argument in the house. My in-laws began thrashing me up and calling me names for making the family matters public. Rizwan told me that he was leaving me for good and uttered the dreaded talaq word thrice. I was kicked out of the house with my one-year-old child in arms. I waited outside the house for several hours, hoping that they will accept me back once their anger subsided. All this time, I kept begging them to forgive me and let me in. Several neighbours came to my help but Rizwan’s family told them that I had been given talaq. The neighbours could do little after that but they arranged my journey to my brother’s house later in the day. My brother tried to speak to Rizwan’s family but they just didn’t listen. Some elders in the vicinity advised us to approach police. Some said the government has brought a law which makes verbal triple talaq illegal. We went to police to file a case against the talaq but the police told us there was no law against triple talaq. However, they filed a case against my husband and his family under sections of domestic violence. SSP (Rajesh) Pandeyji himself heard out matter and has assured us of safety and other assistance prescribed under law. I have studied only Urdu at a madrasa only for one or two years but I have heard Muslims women speaking against talaq on TV. My question to powers-that-be is not about religion, but justice. Hindu women are also troubled for dowry and sometime burnt alive. Muslim women also face such harassment but they burn for life. I want most stringent laws against those who torture their wives and daughters-in-law for dowry and leave them at will.


Also in The Series
Talaq Talaq Talaq… And I Was Homeless In A Second

 ]]>

‘Talaq… And I Was Homeless In A Second’

Shazia Khan was just 26 when the word talaq uttered three times tore her life apart thirteen years ago. She is one of the many Muslim women who came forward last year when the government took up the issue of this instant form of divorce. On December 28, 2017, the Lok Sabha passed The Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Marriage) Bill, 2017, making instant triple talaq in any form – spoken, in writing or by electronic means such as email, SMS and WhatsApp – illegal and void, with up to three years in jail for the husband. The Bill remains to be passed by the Rajya Sabha, with the NDA committed to getting it through and the Opposition adamant on referring it to a select committee. Meanwhile, here is Shazia’s story:   I was a teenager when my nikaah took place with a complete stranger from Pilibhit at my hometown Aligarh in 1993. I had no choice in this matter; destiny took me to Delhi. My husband, Aslam Khan, ran a small watch shop in Karol Bagh. We stayed with my husband’s aunt for some time and later bought our own house in East Delhi, after selling the village house. A month into my marriage, I got to know my husband was an alcoholic who would frequently pass out in public and would have to be carried home. Life went on, however, and I got pregnant less than a year into the marriage. I had a son, and my in-laws also moved in. We had another son later. One day, my husband sold the house and took a ₹36,000 advance from a buyer, a known bad character of our locality. I intervened and made sure the advance was returned. Later, I bought a plot in Mustafabad and built a house there. It was the turn of household items then. One day Aslam and I had an argument after he sold my mixer-grinder. It ended in silence with Aslam saying talaq three times. Our neighbour, Islam bhai, came and told me that I can’t live in the same house with my husband. “Aap yahan nahi reh sakte ho bhabhi (You cannot live here any longer),” he said. Just like that, I was homeless. I moved in with a cousin in Shahdara, Delhi, and called my brothers. We then filed a report of domestic cruelty against my husband, in-laws, my husband’s aunt and her son. Soon enough, my husband apologised and I agreed to go back. My first question, however, was, “How can we live together after talaq?” The answer was, “Marry him again”. This was my encounter with halala, the wedding of a divorced woman to someone else before she can remarry her first ex-husband. My halala husband was Rizwan, my husband’s friend. He was paid ₹1,000 for this deal. My only condition was that Rizwan would have no physical contact with me. As soon as I got back with Aslam, there was another shock waiting: the Mustafabad house had been sold. I was shattered, yet again. Somehow, I found the will to sort out this problem too. The property was registered in my name, so I took over the sale and took about ₹150,000 from the buyer. And ran, leaving even my kids with Aslam. I left for Aligarh, and from there Meerut, where I got a job at a doctor’s clinic. Years passed, till one day my younger son’s ill-health brought me face-to-face with Aslam again. He convinced me into living together again. We rented a flat in Delhi. It wasn’t over, though. One night I woke up to find my husband having sex with a eunuch. No words were exchanged this time, and it was really the end. I’ve been on my own since then, working one job after another to get by. The triple talaq bill is for women like me who’ve fought a losing battle against this practice all their lives.


Also In The Series
I Was Beaten Up Then Thrown Out Of Home For A Car

 ]]>