Let's Start Discussions On Long Vacations: CJI Chandrachud

Let’s Start Discussions On Long Vacations: CJI Chandrachud

Chief Justice of India DY Chandrachud on Sunday said he is ready to begin a conversation on the controversial issue of higher courts going on long vacations.

Each year the Supreme Court goes on over a month-long vacation during the peak summer season. It also takes Christmas/winter break for around two weeks. Besides, the top court closes for a week each during Dussehra and Diwali.

During the summer vacations, the Supreme Court keeps open one or two benches open for hearing urgent and important matters.

“Let us begin the conversation on long vacations and whether alternatives such as flexitime for lawyers and judges is possible,” said the CJI.

There has been a controversy about the long vacation in high judiciary and it has triggered criticisms of pendency. In 2022, former Law Minister Kiren Rijiju reportedly criticised the long vacations of the court and the inconvenience it caused to litigants.

Last year, a Parliamentary panel called for doing away with long vacations in the Supreme Court and the High Courts.

Vacation is a time for judges to write judgments, research, do administrative work, prepare for cases for hearings, and travel.

The remarks of the CJI came at an event as the Supreme Court of India celebrated its diamond jubilee year.

Speaking at an event to mark the 75th Foundation Day of the Supreme Court, the CJI also said that we must emerge out of the adjournment culture to a culture of professionalism.

The legal profession must provide a level playing field for first-generation lawyers – men, women and others from marginalised segments who have the will to work and the potential to succeed, he added.

CJI Chandrachud said that the 75th year since the founding provides an opportunity to meet these challenges and step into the future with an honest assessment of our progress.

“We must reflect on the journey that we have traversed and renew our pledge to uphold the Constitution within and beyond the courtrooms,” he added.

Speaking at the event, also attended by Prime Minister Narendra Modi, CJI said that our decisions both in the judicial and administrative realms, have been aimed at enhancing accessibility to the Indian judicial system for common citizens.

CJI said that through its judgments, the Supreme Court has enhanced the rights of citizens by diluting the standards of locus standi and by recognising a set of new rights under Article 21 of the Constitution, such as the right to a speedy trial.

“On the administrative side, the Supreme Court has been identifying and eliminating as many barriers to justice– unequal access to legal resources, unfamiliarity of the English language, issues of physical accessibility of courts– in order to create procedural fairness,” he added.

Justice Chandrachud said, “Today is not only a celebration of that one day when the Supreme Court came into being, but it also is a celebration of the decades’ worth of hard work by succeeding generations of judges and lawyers that went into making this a ‘people’s court’.”

In celebrating the history of this day, we must look back and look forward in equal measure, he said.

Supreme Court has enabled ‘Futuristic Court Technology’ in three courtrooms and soon other courtrooms shall be equipped with such technology, CJI announced.

“This technology facilitates paperless proceedings, a comprehensive digital library for the bench and the advocates, state-of-the-art video conferencing, large video walls, smart monitors and document visualisers, all of which redefine the courtroom experience,” said the CJI.

He further announced that the Supreme Court is soon going to migrate its digital data to a safe, secure and sovereign cloud.

“This would be a shot in the arm for the IT setup of the Court. Cloud storage would ensure privacy, integrity, high availability, and secure accessibility of the Supreme Court’s domain data. We are also on the verge of opening a War Room equipped with technology that would enable the Supreme Court to monitor judicial data of the entire country in real-time by using the National Judicial Data Grid (NJDG) and Juris, both of which are information-sharing platforms for the district judiciary.

Summarising the achievements of the Supreme Court, CJI also said that nearly 1,28,000 e-filings have been done so far, with a consistent rise in the share of e-filings compared to physical filings.

Even after the pandemic, hybrid hearings continue to be a feature of our courts, said the CJI, adding, that is, any Indian lawyer sitting in any part of the country, or the world can argue before this Court through video conferencing.

Hybrid hearings have democratised access to the Supreme Court and opened the space for those who were unable to approach the Supreme Court due to physical distance, he added.

Till now, we have dealt with over 5 lakh cases through hybrid hearings. The live proceedings of the Supreme Court Constitutional Bench hearings are popular and speak to the genuine curiosity that people have towards our courts and procedures, Justice Chandrachud said.

Further, the Supreme Court of India today operates in a nearly complete paperless mode, with almost all benches using digitised paper books.

“Judges are provided with scanned, bookmarked, and digitally signed case records which they access, read, annotate and preserve for their reference at their residence and in Courtrooms. More than 13 lakh legacy and live case records with approximately 10 crore pages have been digitised,” said the CJI.

Just as we make our courts tech-savvy, we must also realise that India is going through a period of social and demographic transformation, said the CJI, adding that anyone who visits India will notice a striking feature of the changing demographics.

“Now, women can be seen in important positions. There is a focus on greater inclusion of the marginalised sections of society. Equally inspiring is the confidence of the younger population to succeed in their professional lives,” Justice Chandrachud said.

He also said that before the beginning of 2024, only 12 women were designated as ‘senior advocates’ in the history of the Supreme Court over the last 74 years, however, last week, the Supreme Court designated 11 women coming from different parts of the country, as senior advocates at one selection.

“In the near future, we must address the structural issues affecting the judiciary, such as pendency of cases, archaic procedures, and the culture of adjournments. Our effort in our work as judges and administrators must be to ensure dignity to the district judiciary, which is the first point of contact for citizens,” said the CJI. (ANI)

For more details visit us: https://lokmarg.com/

Adani Group on hidenbrug report

Plea Seeking Inquiry Into Atiq Killing On April 28

The Supreme Court on Monday agreed to list on April 28 the plea seeking to constitute an independent expert committee under the chairmanship of a former Supreme Court judge to inquire into the killing of Atiq Ahmed and his brother Ashraf in police presence in Uttar Pradesh’s Prayagraj.

Advocate Vishal Tiwari mentioned before a bench headed by Chief Justice of India DY Chandrachud seeking an urgent hearing of his plea and apprised the court that the matter was scheduled to be listed today.
CJI Chandrachud said that many matters could not get listed as five judges were not available as they were unwell.

Advocate Vishal Tiwari mentioned in SC that his plea sought a probe into the extra-judicial killings in Uttar Pradesh.

In his plea, Tiwari sought to constitute an independent expert committee under the chairmanship of a former Supreme Court judge to inquire into the killing of Atiq and Ashraf.

Advocate Vishal Tiwari has also moved a plea in Supreme Court seeking to constitute an independent expert committee to inquire into the 183 encounters which had occurred since 2017 as stated by the Uttar Pradesh Special Director General of Police (Law and Order) and also to inquire into the police custody murder of Atiq and Ashraf, gangster-turned-politicians.

Gangster-turned-politician Atiq Ahmed and his brother Ashraf were shot dead while they were being taken to a hospital in Prayagraj on April 15 night amid police presence.

Advocate Vishal Tiwari, in his public interest litigation, has also sought to issue direction to unearth the fake encounters by directing the Central Bureau of Investigation to investigate, collect and record the evidence in the Kanpur Bikru Encounter case 2020 in which Vikas Dubey and his aides were killed by police in the encounter as the inquiry commission could not record the evidence in rebuttal of police version and has filed the inquiry report in absence of that.

“The DARE DEVILS which Uttar Pradesh police has tried to become,” the petition said

The petitioner said that the his public Interest Litigation is against the violation of rule of law and oppressive police brutality being perpetrated by Uttar Pradesh.

The petitioner has apprised the court that he has approached the court in a matter pertaining to the Kanpur encounter with Vikas Dubey and said that a similar incident was repeated by Uttar Pradesh police that is encounter killing of Asad son of Atiq Ahmad gangster turned politician and the killing of Atiq Ahmad and his brother Ashraf by private assailants when they were in police custody and were taken for medical examination.

The petitioner said that such incidents are a severe threat to the democracy and rule of law, and such acts are establishments of anarchy and prima facie development of the police state.

He also mentioned that extra-judicial killings or fake police encounters have been very badly condemned under the law and such things can not exist in a democratic society the police cannot be allowed to become a mode of delivering final justice or to become a punishing Authority.

“The power of punishment is only vested in the Judiciary. The police when becomes DARE DEVILS then the entire Rule of law collapses and generates fear in the mind of people (ANI)

Read More: http://13.232.95.176/