The Beef & The Battleship

A banned book, or film, or any work of art, popular or niche, always manages to resurface. Not only does the ‘prohibition’ and deliberate denial create a craving for this inaccessible stuff, but many actually search and seek out the book or film, so as to fulfil their forcibly suppressed curiosity.

It’s a natural, instinctive human craving. The more you deny, the longing for it becomes many times more insatiable and intense.

For instance, how can you kill authentic ideas, or creative imagination, aesthetic images or sound, words or sentences, poetry or song, or any work of meaningful creativity, by blocking it from the public domain? You just can’t do it; they will fly on the wings of desire, imagination and rebellion. They will search and seek out meaning in the dark. They will rediscover and resurrect in multiple forms of revelations.

Here denial is a form of dictatorship. A political denial of an aesthetic and creative product – you might agree or disagree with it. This denial seems deliberate. And, thereby, there will always be people, young and old, who would choose to defy this deliberate, dictatorial, diabolical act.

Adolf Hitler’s Mein Kampf is widely available on roadside book stalls, so is Nathuram Godse’s Why I assassinated Gandhi – you might agree or disagree. No one has asked them to be banned in India.

Similarly, a banned organisation only flourishes – while it goes underground. Look at the RSS. The ban on RSS did not change its support base among its followers, with hate politics as their historically proven trump card. That is their bread and butter.

Banned thrice, first after the assassination of Mahatma Gandhi, nothing much changed in its cadre base despite the ban. Indeed, it is a fact that they flourish only parasitically, when the State is under their control, because they have no history of rebellion, sacrifice, grassroots struggles, or sustained resistance to power establishments. They chose to not fight the British. And we know about the famous ‘apology letter’!

They made no sacrifices during the freedom struggle in which they did not participate, while young revolutionaries like Bhagat Singh, Ashfaqullah Khan, Ramprasad Bismil, Sukhdev, Rajguru and Khudiram Bose were being hanged, or condemned across long distances on the sea to the dingy torture cells of kala paani in the Andamans. Hundreds were jailed in terrible conditions. Earlier, Birsa Munda, in his early 20s, was killed in prison, his rebellion brutally crushed. Even after the Jallianwala Bagh Massacre in Amritsar, they did not change their ways.

They backed Adolf Hitler and the genocide by the Nazis. Then they supported the Holocaust, the gas chambers, and the mass murder of 6 million plus Jews, now they seem to be doing exactly that, tacitly or otherwise, on the genocide in Gaza, while the Zionists have turned mass murderers.

ALSO READ: The Palestinian Rebellion 2.0

What else prompts the BJP regime to stop all peaceful protests in Delhi and elsewhere, against the genocide, whereby thousands of women and children have been targeted and murdered by Israel? When the whole world, in tens of thousands, especially in the West, are protesting on the streets?

Does India stand with Palestine as always, or, is it now, an ally of Israel?

Or, why did they choose to not allow internationally acclaimed films on Palestine for a prestigious international film festival in Trivandrum in Kerala from December 12 to 19, 2025?

Apparently 19 films did not get ‘censor exemptions’. The I&B Ministry, with all its wisdom, stopped 19 films and prohibited their screening at the festival.

These include one of the greatest films in the history of world cinema, The Great Dictator, Charlie Chaplin’s caricature of Adolf Hitler, and the Soviet-era black and white classic, a favourite of filmmakers and film scholars, Sergei Eisenstein’s Battleship Potemkin. The surprising decision, obviously, raised a controversy – though with this regime in New Delhi, nothing surprises anymore.

The Great Dictator: No film buff has missed this film. Millions have seen it many times, and it will be continued to be seen by generations to come. Like most of Chaplin’s great films, including Modern Times, made on the post-depression era in the early 1930s, and a scathing commentary on the cruelties of industrial capitalism, the Orwellian state and factories with their compulsive reduction of workers into objects of hard labour — with no human essence, dignity or identity.

The famous scene of Chaplin, the nut and screw worker, doing his starkly alienated job, repeated again and again, surrounded by ugly machines, tells a story. So much so, when he is not tightening one screw after another, his body and hands are still moving in mechanical motion.

A human being, this worker, thus, has been reduced into a meaningless, mechanical object, a tiny cog in the wheel of profit and exploitation, a mere spare part in a gigantic machine.

Battleship Potemkin, Sergei Eisenstein’s Soviet-era classic, made in 1905, seen in every film club by students across the globe, with its black and white montage, is marked as one of the great learning curves of modern cinema. The scene of the ‘Odessa Steps’, with the Tsar’s army firing indiscriminately and killing ordinary folks, and that incredible shot of a child in its baby carriage, solo and solitary, rolling down the blood-soaked staircase,  has been hailed as a ‘masterpiece moment’ in world cinema.

The rebellion of sailors on a ship became a metaphor of revolutionary uprising, and is often hailed as the starting point of the Bolshevik revolution of 1917 led by Vladimir Iliych Lenin.

As for the I&B ministry decision, filmmaker Adoor Gopalakrishnan said, “All these movies are very important movies in the history of cinema. If they say it cannot be screened then that is because of ignorance. The movie Battleship Potemkin can be considered a textbook to study cinema. People who have no clue about all these are doing this. The authorities should reconsider this decision.”

Resul Pookutty, head of the Kerala Chalachitra Academy and organiser of KFFI, said that the I&B ministry did not provide any reasons for the denial.

Chief Minister Pinarayi Vijayan took a strong stand. He told the Chalachitra Academy to go ahead, screen all films as scheduled, and ignore the Centre’s order. Thereby, many of these films were screened, and the ministry cleared 13 additional films, including Palestine 36, Beef, Heart of the Wolf, Bamako, Battleship Potemkin, Red Rain, Riverstone, The Hour of the Furnace, Tunnels: Sun in the Dark and Timbuktu.

Palestine 36 is a recent, prestigious production on the early history of the occupation backed by the British, made by a woman director, and is pitched to bag many awards in international film festivals. Only the Israeli regime would want to stop this film.

Six films were still not allowed, due to the absence of ‘mandatory political clearance’ from the Ministry of External Affairs (MEA). The films stopped were: All That’s Left of You, Clash, Flames, Eagles of the Republic, Yes, and A Poet: Unconcealed.

In a video message captioned, ‘Unprecedented times, unprecedented decisions’, Pookutty said, “I am happy to let you know, dousing all the fire on the controversy regarding the film screenings at IFFK, we are going ahead with all the screenings as scheduled as per the notification issued by government of Kerala. And Long Live Cinema.”

Pinarayi Vijayan had spoken sharply against the denial of ‘censor exemptions’ to the films including the Spanish hip-hop film BEEF. He said, “They did not give permission for the movie BEEF. Why? Because for them, beef has only one meaning. But the film was not related to the beef we eat. It is based on Spanish hip-hop culture, where ‘beef’ refers to conflict or rebellion.”

As for films on Palestine, he said: “The Union government’s position on Palestine is evident once again, as Palestinian movies were not given permission. This appears to be a politically motivated decision… IFFK will always stand and resist any kind of anti-democratic or fascist steps.”

(The latest unconfirmed news is that the highly-acclaimed films on Palestine, including Palestine 36, were not screened. I hope it is not true.)

Is It Curtains For Cinematic Freedom?

Most governments want control. Some governments want more control than the others. Some governments want more and more control, but also want to appear democratic. They camouflage this obsessive tendency with this or that fig leaf. However, some governments want absolute control, and they care a damn.

Witness what China is doing in Hong Kong. But Hong Kong was not like the ‘mainland’ – it was not like Shanghai, Beijing, Chengdu, Lhasa, or even Urumqi in Xinjiang — under total control of a well-oiled totalitarian system. Hong Kong was so different!

For all you know, these days it reminds of ‘one hundred years of solitude’ in Hong Kong. It’s a new model of ‘cultural revolution’ enshrined by ‘President for Life’: Xi Jinping. Total control on freedom of expression; not even peaceful symbolism is allowed. They might pick you up if you flash your mobile as a sign of ‘creative dissent’.

Therefore, independent newspapers and media outfits etc, have been shut, or, compelled to be shut, while scores of peaceful dissenters and activists are rotting in jail. Also in prison are editors, journalists, and, at least one media owner. This is a ‘gift’ given to the people of Hong Kong as the mainland celebrates ‘one hundred years’ of the Communist Party of China!

Myanmar, like a good neighbour, has chosen China as a role model. A military junta is yet again running amok after dismantling a fragile democracy, killing hundreds of non-violent youngsters, and putting in prison not only Aung Sang Su Kyi, but pro-democracy dissenters, students and journalists. And since doctors and nurses were the first to protest, some of them too have been packed off to prisons, even as the pandemic rages like a death machine. Thus, many doctors and journalists have gone underground, running secret clinics and solo media-outfits, from nameless locations.

Surely, India is not going the Hong Kong or Myanmar way! So, what are the ‘signposts’ of Indian democracy while we await the third surge of a killer virus?

Stan Swamy, 84, no charges proved, not even interrogated by the NIA for one day, his body ravaged by Alzheimer’s and Covid. Witness his slow, tortuous death in jail, without bail — also called an ‘Institutional Murder’.

Or, remember all the others in prison for no rhyme or reason—young, brilliant scholars, eminent intellectuals and academics, under the draconian UAPA, on what are widely perceived to be fake and cooked-up charges.

Indeed, tomorrow, if a filmmaker makes a movie called ‘A Sipper for Stan Swamy’ — it might run into serious trouble.

ALSO READ: An Idea Cannot Be Jailed

It is not only the obsessive addiction with ‘control’ – the ominous signs are all out there: the concerted attack on campuses, the targeting of dissenters, scholars, journalists, intellectuals, the organized move to capture institutions like the FTII and the clampdown, the rampant use of a British-era law like ‘Sedition’, and the way in which sections of the media have become relentless perpetrators of fake, doctored news and hate politics — media ethics can go get damned! Or, the manner in which the organized army of trolls operate — in their crass cacophony, in tandem with the ultra-loyal TV anchors.

A pronounced savagery has come to rule the roost in the dominant political narrative, riding vitriolic, venomous and vicious campaigns, signifying the most bestial dimensions of human nature. This is upfront and ugly – from the murder of journalist Gauri Lankesh, to the death of photo-journalist Danish Siddiqui. Besides, he is a Muslim.

This was exactly the vile method followed in the systematic targeting of Rhea Chakravarty and Deepika Padukone, and the Mumbai film industry! Look at the language they would willfully use! It’s so predictable — this diabolical, indecent diatribe!

Undoubtedly, democracy in India is currently trapped in a twilight zone. It’s a kind of condemnation for an entire nation. There is therefore an immediate historic context to the uncanny unease in the film industry in India — from Mumbai to regional cinema.

So why has the central government sought comments on the ‘draft’ Cinematograph (Amendment) Bill 2021? And what are the proposals in this new draft bill? 

To punish piracy with a fine and jail term, bring in age-based certification, and, most significantly, empower the central government with the power to seek ‘recertification’ of a film already certified by the Central Board of Film Certification (CBFC).

ALSO READ: Social Media Rules – Curtailing Whose Freedom

Several eminent filmmakers have written to the government: “Undermining the sovereignty of the Censor Board and the Supreme Court, this provision will effectively give the central government supreme power over cinema exhibition in the country, potentially endangering freedom of expression and democratic dissent.”

They are backed by scores of film associations and unions like the Producers Guild of India (PGI), Indian Film and Television Producers Council (IFTPC), Indian Motion Pictures Producers Association Associate (IMPAA), Western India Film Producers Association (WIFPA), Federation of Western India Cine Employees (FWICE), Indian Film and Television Directors Association (IFTDA), the Associated Chamber of Commerce of India (ASSOCHAM), Screen Writers Association (SWA), among others. There is a massive campaign on by academics, filmmakers, writers, artists, etc, arguing that this new proposal should be dropped lock, stock and barrel.

So, why this new draft at all? Why this need to ‘rethink’ certification once the CBFC has passed it?

In April this year, the Centre dissolved the Film Certification Appellate Tribunal (FCAT), where filmmakers could go seeking relief from decisions of the Censor Board which they did not agree with. Besides, there is a considered opinion in the film industry that the CBFC should only do certification, and not censor a film!

There can be many stated and unstated reasons behind this move, and conspiracy theorists can fly to the moon. Control, undoubtedly. But the underlying message could be less subtle: Choose self-censorship as a one-stop-shop, drop subjects which might seem to annoy the powers-that-be, toe the line, follow the dominant code of conduct, accept passive submission in terms of script, story-line or cinematic content, even songs and lyrics, take the safe way out, no creative subversion please, drop/rethink historical narratives with a historical backdrop, if they re-write history, keep your mouth shut, drop/rethink socially and politically relevant themes, avoid controversial current affairs, don’t make films which tell an established truth but they want it to be hushed up, avoid bitter realism, avoid realism, period. Don’t make films which they might not like; indeed, just don’t make films, period.

Said a filmmaker, “Tomorrow, after a film is passed by the CBFC, a group or politician might claim that the film is anti-national and a ruckus is socially engineered. So the government might just come in and block/delay the film. So what should the filmmaker do? Jump in which nearest well?”

Others say this is also a time-tested method to test the muddy waters, to send signals, and to put a leash on the film industry which has been historically secular. Anyway, with so much money pumped in, why should a commercial filmmaker or a mega star choose to not toe the line? As for the offbeat filmmaker making meaningful cinema – she/he can go hang themselves! The sword hangs like McCarthyism in the US during the Cold War.

In such a hopeless futuristic scenario, most good filmmakers will either stop making good films, or make only such films that make the ‘system’ happy. Meaningful, aesthetic or socially/politically relevant cinema just cannot be made in such a realm of authoritarian control, fear and uncertainty. In such a scenario, can a filmmaker really make a movie like ‘Parzania’ or ‘Haider’? Or,afilm on the assassination of Gandhi, for instance? Indeed, if you call a film ‘The Oxygen Cylinder’ with the second surge of mass cremations as a backdrop, they might just choose to get it canned – The End!