‘Radhika Yadav’s Case Underlines Value of Close Communication in Nuclear Families’

Richa Srivastava, a family counsellor and a homemaker, blames a toxic combination of pride, patriarchy and prejudice for the young tennis player’s killing. Her advice:

The recent case of a father taking the life of her 25-year old daughter, Radhika Yadav could well be the result of some kind of emotional situation that blew out of proportion resulting in damaging the entire family. Even though there are various theories floating in sections ofmedia, the main reason behind such situations is clash of egos between parents and kids. In the present scenario, where every member of the family is well educated and well connected on social media, there is little to hide regarding your superficial social life.

According to media reports, her father, Deepak Yadav, confessed to the heinous crime and has reportedly expressed remorse over the killing, demanding punishment. Some media reports have also quoted him as saying “I have committed Kanya Vadh” citing societal pressure and disapproval of her earning money through tennis coaching. But this, according to me, could not be the only motive behind the crime.

The case could well be a classic example of the psychology of pride, patriarchy and prejudice – that parents may expect obedience and success from their children by projecting their own goals of fear and self-respect on them. The question of what might have pushed Deepak Yadav to over the edge – bottled-up rage, patriarchy squeezing the life out of everyone and the pressure to keep appearances.

ALSO READ: ‘There Is More To Radhika’s Death Than A Disturbed Father’

One possible cause could be displaced anger when anger from one source – like social humiliation or loss of control – is redirected toward a safer target that is often the family. Also an ongoing stress or a perceived disrespect added with a weak sense of self- worth is exacerbated by social scrutiny and status anxiety. It’s possible that Radhika’s ambition and independence, which were developed in the meritocracy of sports, widened the divide and the parent-child relationship became entangled with identity and control especially when the family is a high-achieving family.

The toxic idea that a man’s respect depends solely on being the breadwinner, or that a daughter’s success undermines her father’s standing, is deeply flawed. Emotional dysregulation can result from unfulfilled expectations, particularly in parents who lack coping mechanisms and this murder is not just a personal tragedy—it’s a mirror reflecting a deep societal sickness.

Stress caused by those close to you can feel hard to escape sometimes. But learning to manage its impact is possible. Family stress can flare up for you and your family, no matter what role you find yourself in.

Children, throughout their association with their parents, need help in learning to manage and function with the stress they feel. One means to assist children is to acknowledge their feelings and make efforts to cut down on activities when you see signs of stress in their behaviour.

In addition, encourage open and honest communication within the family to address concerns and conflicts proactively, establish predictable routines to provide a sense of stability and reduce stress, listening attentively to each family member’s concerns and feelings, fostering understanding and empathy are some of the practices that should be adopted by all families to avoid falling in any kind of situation that could negatively affect the family and future generations.

As told to Rajat Rai

‘Radhika Yadav’s Death Isn’t About A Disturbed Father. The Malaise Runs Deeper’

Aayushi Rana, a Dellhi-based fact-checker & researcher, yearns for a society where daughters feel safe to share their dreams, dilemmas with parents. Her views:

We often assume that modernity and education automatically brings progressive thinking, but sadly that’s a myth. Deep-seated patriarchy and male-driven control & entitlement can thrive even in urban, seemingly ‘modern’ spaces. The cold-blooded killing of budding tennis player Radhika Yadav by her father is a glaring case in point.

There are still speculations: What could have led the father to pump bullets into his talented daughter’s back while she was cooking at home in upscale Sushant Lok, Gurugram? Was it the tennis academy she ran, and her high national rankings in the game? A music video she made last year? Wounded pride? Or, it something else entirely?

If a social media ‘reel’ triggered the act, then we need to ask why something so small is threatening to a father. Many children, especially girls, want to be seen and heard. But, despite social progress, parental environments are often lacking in emotional presence, especially when it comes to girls asserting their voice or identity.

This system of control over how daughters must think and feel, how they must live their everyday life, how they should dress and express themselves, is not only outdated, but also extremely dangerous. Neither children nor adults can thrive in an environment built on surveillance and dominance. And contrary to what many parents believe, control does not lead to discipline—it often creates rebellion, secrecy, or trauma.

We must stop reducing such incidents to ‘personal madness’. This is not only about one disturbed father; it’s a reflection of a violent system of gendered control that continues to fester in our homes. It calls for a deep reflection on how we raise boys, define fatherhood, and whether we truly understand what it means to let our children be themselves fully and freely.

This assessment is, sadly, deeply rooted in the ‘lived reality’ of many girls. From a psychological lens, repeated invalidation during early years—being made to feel ‘less’, can lead to deep-seated patterns of self-doubt, anxiety and rebellion, which are often misunderstood. What is heartbreaking is that mothers, too, sometimes, because of ‘internalised patriarchy’ or survival within rigid family structures, become complicit in this inequality.

Although there has been a visible shift in attitudes over the years, this subtle alienation still persists, especially behind the closed doors of urban or ‘modern’ homes. Undoubtedly, parents worry more about their daughters’ safety in today’s world, but that concern must not come at the cost of their freedom, or reduce daughters to a ‘problem’ to be protected from the world.

It works both ways; daughters, too, must feel safe enough to share their dreams, struggles, dilemmas and choices with their parents. And, in turn, parents must strive for openness, understanding, and balanced guidance, without disproportionate expectations based on gender. This balance between emotional presence and reasonable boundaries is the foundation of meaningful parenting.

There is no set rule for what makes a ‘perfect’ parent.  However, one thing is universal: every child wants to be seen, heard, and valued. And perhaps the least we can do, as parents or adults, is to meet them there with grace, patience, and empathy. 

Rana feels children, especially girls, want to be seen and heard

When it comes to the young being hooked to social media, instead of fear or control, we need conversation and curiosity. Social media is not just a distraction; it’s a space where young people explore identity, find community, and, often, escape. For daughters especially, it becomes a double-edged sword, empowering in some ways, but also opening spaces for exposure which can be dangerous or difficult to handle. The answer is not surveillance, it’s trust.

ALSO READ: ‘We Failed Radhika, Let’s Save Other Daughters’

Parents should begin by building that trust early: sit with them while they scroll, take genuine interest in what they are watching or creating, and ask questions like “What do you like about this content?”, “What are you learning from it?”, or, “How do you feel when you see this?” These aren’t interrogations, they are invitations. Curiosity, not criticism, can help the young reflect on their choices and understand their online world more mindfully.

Beauty and anxiety have, sadly, become intertwined for girls on social media platforms. Constant exposure to unrealistic beauty standards, filters, and comparisons can distort their self-worth. It can have a long-term impact.

Parents can play a powerful role here, not by pulling them away from the screen, but by making sure that they are seen, heard, and valued in real life. Instilling values — that inner beauty, idealism, strength of character, compassion and sharing, are more important. When a child feels secure offline, they are less likely to seek validation online.

The goal is not to remove the phone, but to become a space more comforting and meaningful than any algorithm ever could.

Social media doesn’t create insecurity; it amplifies it. What we see—be it filters, curated beauty, or ‘coolness’– is often a reflection of a deeper societal hunger for validation. Girls and boys are exposed to impossible ideals.

Let’s remember: they are learning by watching us too. When adults mock appearance, shame bodies, or consume similar content in silence, we send mixed signals.

Instead of shaming, we must equip them with critical thinking: why do we feel the need to present ourselves in a certain way? Who benefits from these insecurities? Let’s teach them not to reject themselves, but to question the world that asks them to.

Social media isn’t inherently toxic; it’s a mirror of the world we have created. Yes, it’s chaotic, overwhelming, full of distractions, but it’s also where young people are thinking, learning and connecting. I have seen students use it to speak up on issues they care about, access mental health resources, learn new skills, find community, or just feel less alone in a noisy, impersonal world.

For many, especially those growing up in restrictive environments, it’s not just a platform, it’s a lifeline. The real issue is not the screen; it’s the silence at home. When we don’t give our children the space to express themselves, they turn to the digital world that does.

Instead of writing off these platforms with moral panic, adults need to show up, not just as watchdogs, but as trustworthy mentors. We need to teach kids how to engage critically, not just scroll passively. What are they watching? Why does it matter to them? What are they learning?

This isn’t about control, it’s about equipping them to handle a complex world.

(The narrator is also a digital forensics trainer, having conducted training sessions for journalists and students in India and abroad, on misinformation, fake news, digital safety and verification techniques. Her current work involves media literacy and socio-political research. She is a post-graduate in History from Aligharh Muslim Univesity)

As told to Amit Sengupta

‘As A Society We Failed Radhika Yadav, Let’s Save Other Daughters’

Prof (Dr.) Mehak Jonjua, who teaches at Sharda University, says killing of a budding tennis star points to a societal malaise and a collective responsibility. Her views:

Radhika Yadav—just 21 years old, full of life, a national tennis player. She had dreams in her eyes, strength in her arms, and a future waiting for her. And yet, on July 10, 2025, she was killed. By her own father.

As a professor, I have studied violence in families. As a citizen, I have read these headlines before. But as a mother—especially of a young girl who is also an athlete, training hard every day to become a boxer—I am heartbroken in a way I cannot explain.

I keep picturing Radhika in her room—maybe she had just come back from practice, sweaty, exhausted, hungry. Maybe she was texting a friend. Maybe she had plans for a tournament or was helping a student with their serve. In that ordinary moment, her life was taken. Why?

They say it was an “honour killing.” This word makes me shiver. What kind of honour demands your own child’s life? What kind of family honour blinds one with such cruelty?

Radhika’s home, like many in our society, wasn’t a safe space. She followed rules that made her feel small. Her clothes were questioned. Her friendships were doubted. Her choices were labeled as disobedience. She wasn’t asking for anything outrageous—just the right to be herself.

I have seen this quiet suffering in many young women. I have taught them. I have counselled them. And yes, I have argued with my own daughter sometimes when she wears bold colours, speaks her mind, or comes home with bruises from the boxing ring. But I always remind myself—her strength is not a threat. Her independence is not rebellion. It’s her right.

ALSO READ: ‘Even Judges Carries Preconceived Bias Towards Women Role’

We, as parents, are supposed to be the ones they run to—not the ones they run away from.

Radhika’s death is not just one family’s tragedy. It is all of ours: A societal malaise and a collective responsibility. It reminds us that too many homes are controlled by fear and pride, not love and trust. The numbers—1,500 family-related killings in 2023—are horrifying, yes. But statistics don’t cry. Daughters do.

I don’t know Radhika personally, but I feel as if I do. She was the girl next door. One of the students in my class. The friend your daughter laughed with at practice. She could’ve been my daughter. She is every daughter who’s ever been told, “Don’t talk back,” “Stay silent,” “Don’t shame us.”

It’s time to break this silence.

Talk to your children. Not at them. With them. Let them be proud of who they are without fearing your love will disappear the moment they say or wear something you don’t like.

We can’t bring Radhika back. But we can make sure no more daughters are lost to this twisted idea of “honour.”

As a mother, I promise: my daughter’s voice will never be a reason for fear. It will be my pride.

As told to Deepti Sharma