Centre’s Attitude Towards Harassment of Women is Primitive and Despicable

Nearly five months. That is how long it took for a minister of the government of India to finally take note of the protests by women wrestlers and meet them, many of them Olympians and national-level champions, against alleged sexual harassment by the president of the Wrestling Federation of India (WFI), Brij Bhushan Sharan Singh. The women wrestlers have accused the 66-year-old Singh, of groping, touching the breasts and navels without consent and demanding sexual favours from women wrestlers during his ongoing stint as the boss of the federation.

The wrestlers, who were supported by many of their male peers in the sport (but also conspicuously not supported by many Indian sportspersons, including women athletes such as the sprint champion P.T. Usha) took to the streets with their protests, assembling at Delhi’s Jantar Mantar for the first time in January this year. After they were assured that a committee formed by the government would look into it, the protests were called off. But in April, after the committee submitted its report, the protestors felt it was biased and favoured the accused and they resumed the protests.

The protests soon turned political with the ruling Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) ostensibly supporting the accused who, incidentally, is a member of the party and an MP with considerable clout, facing off against most of the leading opposition parties. Police tried to forcibly remove the protestors from the venue of the protests and in the skirmishes many leading athletes were subjected to violence.

Singh has all along denied the charges and a police FIR filed by his accusers has till now basically led nowhere. Last week, after nearly five months since the accusations were made, a government minister finally met the protestors and assured them that a swift probe would be undertaken. On that assurance, the wrestlers have called off their protests for now.

The thing is India’s attitude towards sexual harassment is very primitive. During the years that the #MeToo movement gathered momentum throughout the world, and charges against leading personalities in entertainment, media, politics, and many other fields led to either their downfall or prosecution, or both, in India also there were a spurt of allegations against noted celebrities, politicians, editors, and others. Almost all of those who were then accused of sexual harassment have remained unscathed. Many of them are back in business and continue to hog the media limelight quite shamelessly. If Brij Bhushan Singh, a grandfather accused of groping young athletes, goes scot free, do not be surprised.

Will Nitish be the one to bell the cat?

Nitish Kumar, chief minister of Bihar, is an astute politician. He is also wily and opportunistic. He has never been averse to switching sides to suit his political ambitions. Those who have followed his moves have seen him ally with the BJP when it suits him; and then ditch that alliance when it doesn’t. Like many powerful regional leaders, Kumar, 72, has long harboured ambitions of becoming the prime minister of India. Now, he his putting together his plans to try and achieve those dreams.

A few weeks back, Kumar proposed a joint opposition strategy to challenge the BJP at the Centre in next year’s parliamentary elections. The idea was to have a convenor (read: Nitish Kumar, of course) who would rally the leaders of the main opposition parties to join hands and form a coalition that would together  field one strong candidate, irrespective of which constituent of the coalition he or she represented, against the BJP candidate in each parliamentary constituency. So, in each constituency that had a BJP candidate contesting, the coalition would choose one candidate who was best suited to defeat the BJP contender.

Some opposition leaders seem to be buying into the idea. Later this month, at a meeting convened by Kumar in Patna, several opposition leaders are scheduled to meet. According to reports, those who have confirmed include Congress president Mallikarjun Kharge, Congress leader Rahul Gandhi, and the chief ministers of Tamil Nadu, West Bengal, Jharkhand and Delhi.

India’s national level politics is littered with the remains of unsuccessful coalition governments: they usually start with promise but end with acrimonious bickering, which is, as you might have already guessed, all over power, position, and pelf. It would be interesting to see whether Kumar’s proposal, which would require parties to swallow their pride and support their rivals in each parliamentary constituency, does actually take off.

The hoopla over the Miss World contest is so anachronistic

Newspapers in India have been gushing about India’s chance to host the Miss World finals once again after 27 years. Miss World is one of the oldest international beauty pageants, created in the United Kingdom by Eric Morley in 1951 Since Morley’s death in 2000, his widow, Julia Morley, co-chairs the pageant. The pageant has grown into one of the world’s biggest and has raised more than £1 billion for children’s charities that help disabled and underprivileged children.

But, the competition, open to women from all over the world who are between the ages of 16 and 27, is said to be one where contestants are judged on their beauty, talent and intelligence, in reality it is a regressive objectification of women.

If India took the lead to initiate, say, a competition that was gender neutral and judged young contestants on the basis of their personalities and intelligence regardless of their gender then that could have been a more thought-provoking headline rather than the swooning excitement that media have been exuding about this year’s Miss World contest, which will once again judge women as objects.

Russia-Ukraine war continues…

The Nova Kakhovka dam on Ukraine’s Dnieper river collapsed on Tuesday, flooding villages, endangering crops and threatening drinking water supplies as both sides in the war scrambled to evacuate residents and blamed each other for the destruction. Ukraine accused Russia of blowing up the dam, which is in an area that Russia has been controlling since the early days of the ongoing war. Russia has, however, denied the accusations and blamed Ukraine for bombing the area.

Meanwhile, Ukraine has ratcheted up its counter-offensive against Russia to recapture territory that it has lost. The attacks have been small thus far but a larger offensive is expected soon.

14-year-old to work at Elon Musk’s Space-X

And now for some good news… A 14-year-old boy has been hired as a software engineer by Elon Musk’s Space-X, the satellite communications and spacecraft manufacturer. Quazi, who is set to graduate from the Santa Clara University School of Engineering this month, is the youngest hire by Space-X.  He has demonstrated exceptional verbal skills from a young age and has an extraordinary aptitude for learning. Kairan has IQ certifications from Davidson Institute Young Scholar, Mensa, Johns Hopkins Center for Talented Youth, and others.

Expel Rahul Gandhi? Or Allow Him to Speak?

Expel Rahul Gandhi? Or Allow Him to Speak?

Should Rahul Gandhi be allowed to speak or be expelled from Lok Sabha?

Last week the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP), which leads India’s ruling regime, issued a notice in Lok Sabha urging the speaker seeking an order to expel Rahul Gandhi, Congress MP and a former president of the party. The grounds for seeking his expulsion were allegations that he had breached his privileges as a parliamentarian by the comments he had made about governance in India, India’s foreign policy, particularly related to China, and issues concerning democracy and freedom of speech in the country. Gandhi was reported to have made these comments during a recent foreign visit to the UK where he had several speaking engagements.

For four days scheduled normal work in Parliament had come to a halt while members of the ruling regime and those from the Opposition, chiefly Gandhi’s party, sparred over this. While in the UK, Gandhi had alleged that Indian democracy was in peril and that he was not allowed to speak freely in Parliament. Last week, amid the noisy protests and counter-protest in Parliament, Gandhi followed up his UK speeches by meeting with the Lok Sabha speaker and asking that he be given time to speak on the floor of the House. Gandhi referred to four members from the BJP who spoke in Parliament and accused Gandhi of “belittling” and “insulting” Indian democracy on foreign shores.

Gandhi was quoted in The Hindu as saying: “If Indian democracy was functioning, I would be able to say my piece in Parliament.” And adding: “So, actually what you are saying is a test of Indian democracy, after four BJP leaders made allegations about a member of Parliament, is that member of Parliament going to be given the same space that those four members were given, or is he be going to be told to shut up?”

Well, does Gandhi deserve the right to speak his mind in Parliament? Or should he be expelled for breach of privilege? The answer would depend on how his statements made in the UK are interpreted against the privileges enjoyed by MPs in India.

The Indian parliament and its members from both houses (the Lok Sabha and the Rajya Sabha) enjoy certain rights and protection. The Constitution of India grants MPs privileges or advantages under Articles 105 and 194 so that they can carry out their responsibilities and functions without hurdles. These privileges are aimed at ensuring proper democratic functioning of the legislature. The question is whether Gandhi breached these privileges by making the statements that he did while in the UK.

It would all depend on how the speaker of the Lok Sabha, Om Birla, responds to the notice. If the speaker decides that it is a matter that warrants discussion then the notice would be sent to the Lok Sabha’s committee of privileges, which could investigate the matter and decide whether Gandhi was in breach of the privileges that he is entitled to as MP. It could then prepare a report on the matter, which along with recommendations for action against Gandhi, could be tabled before the House for a decision.

Going by precedence, however, it is not common for breach of privilege notices to be escalated by the speaker to the next level by referring them to the privileges committee. But Gandhi also faces another complaint that the privileges committee is already examining. These are charges against him of making “derogatory” comments about the Prime Minister, Narendra Modi, which allege that he (Modi) gave favourable treatment to the industrialist, Gautam Adani, who was recently accused by an activist short selling firm of financial manipulation and deception.

How the charges against Gandhi will pan out could likely be seen next week in Parliament. Will he be allowed to speak? Or will the notice against him be acted upon? Or, will the House continue to be disrupted as the fracas between the ruling regime and the Opposition stymies normal work to the detriment of the nation?

To make sense of the world, watch China; not the US

It was a case of the mediator making bigger news than the two long-time foes who shook hands last week. When Saudi Arabia and Iran, two countries that have been in confrontation for many decades, partly based on historical and religious enmity, decided to shake hands and resume diplomatic relations, it was a major breakthrough in the geopolitics that dominates West Asia. Saudi Arabia, dominated by Sunni Muslims, and Iran, which is dominated by Shia Muslims, have been at loggerheads for long. And their conflict (accompanied by proxy wars) has been known as the Cold War in the Middle East, an analogical reference to the Cold War between the West, notably the US and the erstwhile Soviet Union.

But while geopolitical analysts have welcomed the beginning of a rapprochement between Saudi and Iran, the spotlight shone more brightly upon the mediator—in his case, China, led by its hugely powerful president and head of state Xi Jinping. China’s emergence as a broker of peace in the Middle East is of great significance and can be seen as the beginning (or, as some analysts would say, continuation) of the development by which it is has begun supplanting the gradually declining dominance and clout of the US in the region.

The Middle East is important for China for obvious reasons. Shorn of all frippery, the Middle East is of importance for all major nations for its oil. By enabling the “handshake” between Saudi and Iran, China has now become a close and reliable ally of two of the world’s largest producers of oil. And instead of others, such as the US and Russia, it has not had to resort to armed conflict in the region. Xi’s diplomacy is driven by his country’s economic and commercial objectives.

For China, gaining a major presence in the Middle East ties in with its overall strategy of the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) by which it wants to connect Asia with Africa and Europe through land and maritime networks aimed at improving regional integration, increasing trade and stimulating economic growth. Brokering peace between Saudi and Iran will give it the boost it needs to cement the BRI in the region.

In fact, more than the moves that the US makes in the global arena, it is China’s moves that deserve to be observed with more focus. Last week the US president Joe Biden made a bit of news when he welcomed the International Criminal Court’s “arrest warrant” against Russia’s president Vladimir Putin for “war crimes” in Ukraine. The warrant means nothing. Russia is not a member of the ICC, which is based in The Hague and has no jurisdiction in Putin’s country. Biden’s welcoming of a warrant that is unlikely to be exercised is even less significant. It is non-news.

What is of major significance, however, is the announcement that Xi Jinping would be visiting Russia next week in his first visit after Russia attacked Ukraine and started the ongoing war back in February 2022. Although China claims that it is a neutral peace broker between Russia and Ukraine that should fool nobody. China’s diplomatic and commercial ties with Russia have been growing consistently. Xi’s visit, which will be marked by a face-to-face meeting between him and Putin, therefore, could signal the fast-emerging superpower’s support for Putin and for Russia, something that could be an unambiguous wake-up call for the West. To make sense of where the world is headed, watch China. And not the US.

Preventing another Covid wave

In directions to six Indian states–Maharashtra, Gujarat, Telangana, Tamil Nadu, Kerala, and Karnataka—the Centre’s health secretary has asked the state authorities to pre-empt and control the sudden and resurgent trend of spreading infections related to the Covid virus. The states have been asked to  focus on testing, treating, tracking, and vaccination.

Last week, on Thursday, 700 Covid cases were recorded in a day after an interval of four months and they were concentrated in these six states. India wants no repeat of the past waves of the Covid related cases, hospitalisations, and deaths.

Mainly because of India’s huge population and its density, the several waves of the virus since the pandemic emerged in November 2019 have taken a big toll on India. The number of people infected by Covid is reported at 44,694,349; the number of deaths at 530,799; and the number that recovered from the illness at 44,158,161.

Another case against Sisodia!

There was a fresh setback to the deputy chief minister of Delhi, Manish Sisodia, who is also a trusted lieutenant of the chief minister and Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) president Arvind Kejriwal, who has been in custody after the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) arrested him in connection with a (now withdrawn) new liquor sales policy.

Now, the CBI has charged him with surveilling people and political entities that were opposed to the AAP government and its leaders. According to the charges, Sisodia allegedly misused the Feedback Unit formed by the Delhi government. The unit, set up in 2015, was aimed at gathering ‘actionable feedback’ about the working of government departments and related agencies. The CBI has charged Sisodia with using it to snoop on his party its leader’s opponents. AAP has, of course denied it and said that the CBI move is politically motivated by the Centre and the ruling regime led by the BJP, an arch opponent of AAP.

India gets an US envoy after 2 years

Although Eric Garcetti was appointed by Joe Biden as the new Ambassador to India in 2021, he couldn’t take office because of an ongoing dispute. When Garcetti was mayor of Los Angeles, he was believed not to have taken appropriate action against an aide who was accused of sexual harassment. Last week, finally, Garcetti was cleared to take office in New Delhi.

For two crucial years, Washington did not have a man in India’s capital. This has particularly been critical in the past year since the Russia-Ukraine conflict. India has not unambiguously condemned Russia and continues to have trade and defence ties with the country—it buys huge amounts of Russian oil as well as weaponry. This has irked the US, which also a major trading partner of India. The US is also concerned about the growing influence and impact of China in the region, especially on the border that the latter shares with India.

At a juncture such as this, having an US envoy in India is important and this is now finally completed.

Read More Article: http://13.232.95.176/