‘Modi Govt Has Taken J&K Status Back to 1947’

To bring our readers a separatist’s view on the Kashmir issue, LokMarg speaks to Zafar Khan, head of diplomatic affairs in the Jammu & Kashmir Liberation Front (JKLF). Khan believes that by abolishing Article 370, India has taken the status quo in the state back to August 1947. Now, he insists, it is no longer a regional issue between the two countries and the international community must assert on tripartite talks.

What do you make of this step taken by Government of India on Article 370 and 35A?

Article 370 defined a temporary constitutional relationship between Jammu Kashmir and India. Its abolition does not mean Jammu and Kashmir becomes a territory of India. What this chauvinistic and confused Government’s betrayal of an agreement made to the international community in fact means is that there is no longer a bridge between Jammu Kashmir and India. In reality and under international law, Jammu Kashmir has reverted to its constitutional position which it had prior to creation of Pakistan, and modern India on 14 and 15 August 1947 respectively. In other words, the temporary and provisional accession of Jammu Kashmir with India no longer exists. Indian position in Jammu Kashmir today is that of an occupying power without legal justification to be there and hence open to international interference. This now opens the long dreamt legitimate hope of the people of Jammu Kashmir gaining complete independence because the status quo has been pushed back to the 1947.

Today as India holds on to Jammu Kashmir with its military might, brutal force and brazen denial of the inherent, inalienable and internationally recognised sovereign right to self-determination of the people in Jammu Kashmir, it is important to appreciate some legal and constitutional facts as well as responsibilities under international law.

But article 370 is part of the Indian constitution and India can change any constitutional article by its majority if it wants, can’t it?

Article 370 of the Indian constitution defined the sphere of responsibilities between Jammu Kashmir and republic of India pending resolution of the Kashmir issue through UN sponsored Plebiscite. Under article 370, India was responsible for defence, Foreign affairs and Communications. While 35A protected in particular property rights and citizenship. Article 370 didn’t make Jammu Kashmir part of India. It is only part of the Indian constitution for convenience of Indian State to define its administrative status with Jammu Kashmir. India does have right to change aspects of its constitution but by rescinding it, India is effectively breaking that relationship and its arrangement thereby restoring the status of Jammu Kashmir to pre Article 370. It does not have the right to occupy, or change the status of Jammu Kashmir because the State is not part of India. To date and after the 1948 war between India  and Pakistan, the partitioned Jammu Kashmir has been known as Indian occupied Kashmir while Azad Kashmir has been called Pakistan occupied Kashmir.

What about the treaty of accession?

The treaty of accession between the ruler Hari Singh and India was challenged by Pakistan because the will of the people had not been taken into account. It was offered by India at the UN to have Article 370 as a temporary measure until a plebiscite was held. There have been 15 UN resolutions concerning India and Pakistan and there was the 1972 Shimla Accord with Pakistan. In all these the third party in dispute was and continues to be the people of Jammu Kashmir.

Unlike Modi, who has essentially land grabbed Jammu Kashmir, one of the founding fathers and first Prime minister of independent India, Pandit Jawaharlal Nehru, declared in a statement in the Amrita Bazar Patrika of Calcutta on 2 January 1952 that “Kashmir is not the property of India or Pakistan. It belongs to the Kashmiri people. When Kashmir acceded to India, we made it clear to the leaders of the Kashmiri people that we would ultimately abide by the verdict of their plebiscite. If they tell us to walk out, I would have no hesitation in quitting Kashmir.” He continued by affirming that “we have taken the issue to the United Nations and given our word of honour for a peaceful solution. As a great nation, we cannot go back on it. We have left the final solution to the people of Kashmir and we are determined to abide by their decision.”

Is there ambiguity which enables India to see the situation differently and think it has to integrate Kashmir with rest of India?

There is no ambiguity. What ambiguity? By derogating from the promise made by India’s first Prime Minister India has colonised Jammu Kashmir. India has now deployed well in excess of 800,000 military and paramilitary forces to occupy Jammu Kashmir, disregarding internationally accepted agreements and commitments and violating human rights with impunity. While Modi calls this integrating Jammu Kashmir with rest of India, the simple historic and legal facts seem to have been missed in the calculation. They cannot be ignored.

The presidential order on 5 August 2019 with which Modi government annexed Jammu Kashmir and dismembered its political and territorial unity by its absorption of the entire Indian occupied part of the state as a union territory with direct rule from New Delhi has no locus standi. It is plain and simply an invasion and an illegal occupation, continuing colonialism under a new regime. This day will for ever be etched in the memory of Jammu Kashmir citizens as a black day, and a catastrophe, and a day of Nakba on both sides of the ceasefire line in Kashmir and throughout the world.

On this day, India’s communalist and chauvinist leadership, representing the so called largest democracy in the world, disdainfully with a stroke of pen, defied the international community by disregarding international agreements, the regional commitments and the promise to the people of Jammu Kashmir. Human Rights violations have increased exponentially.

What sort of human rights have been violated?

You don’t need to take our word for it. The Office of UN’s High Commissioner for Human Rights published its second report on 8 July 2019 to follow its first ever report on human rights situation in Kashmir of 14 June 2018, which  identified human rights violations and use of militarised violence with impunity against civilian population, and recommended among other things that the  Armed Forces Special Powers Act AFSPA, which gives complete immunity to the security forces must be repealed, and recommended that changes to the draconian Public Safety Act, P S A, should be made to make it consistent with international law.

The UNHCHR has asked the Indian government to be allowed to visit both Indian and Pakistani sides of the divided land to investigate and verify allegations of human rights violations. But India has consistently refused to accede to the request of the Human Rights Commissioner. Ironically Indian government demands that it should be made a permanent member UNSC.

Now an iron curtain has descended over Jammu Kashmir and the huge occupation force has imprisoned millions of men, women and children in their own homes. Thousands of para military and military troops are taking out flag marches throughout the cities, towns, hamlets and villages of Kashmir to instil fear, and awe of the Indian state’s oppressive power. Internet and telephone service are disconnected and an indefinite curfew on the helpless population is enforced at gun point. This is against international law.

Is there a way forward?

Nehru’s statement in 1952 in fact explains the essence of the Kashmir issue. Because at the heart of the conflict in Jammu Kashmir, lies the fundamental principle of the, inherent and inalienable sovereign right of Kashmiris to determine their political destiny. Nehru as well as other Indian leaders in the past including even Atal Bihari Vajpayee, the first ever BJP Prime Minister of India accepted, and respected the democratic rights of the Kashmiris but Modi and ultra-chauvinist successors are nothing like Vajpayee. As a staunch Hindu, Vajpayee, believed and followed god Ram who was legendry for upholding promises and ethics. Which god is Modi following? Modi is not Vajpayee. He does not come close to him.

What if India does not accept your proposition?

As Kashmiris we strongly believe that the history of the almost seventy two year old Kashmir dispute is full of betrayals, duplicity and hypocrisy by India in particular, indifference and abandonment of Kashmiris’ basic rights by the big regional and other powers.

In this desperately fraught situation with national annihilation of the Kashmiri nation under the oppressive onslaught of Indian juggernaut, people of Jammu Kashmir justifiably appeal for support in their struggle to exercise their national self-determination. Kashmiris have always sought to make their country a bridge of peace in South Asia.

Now the international community must intercede since by unilaterally rescinding Article 370 and 35A, India has taken the situation to pre August 1947. India must be made to engage in dialogue with the people of Jammu Kashmir and Pakistan under the United Nations auspices for a just and equitable resolution of the issue.

Is there anything else you wish to say?

The post August 1947 arrangements have ended, hence the international community should insist on tripartite talks and demand the release of leaders like Yasin Malik and others, illegally incarcerated. It should insist on lifting the ban of political parties like the JKLF which is committed to a peaceful political solution of the long standing Kashmir issue. In fact there is a hearing next week in front of the tribunal to lift the ban which should never have been placed in the first place. JKLF is a peaceful political organisation representing the aspirations of all Kashmiris regardless of their religion or background. An international mediated way forward starting the clock from 1947 is now the only way forward to extract the region out of the Kashmir imbroglio. Modi has unwittingly brought it to this, now the international community must act.  

(Zafar Khan is a retired academic. He has served JKLF in political and diplomatic fields for 41 years. The views expressed are his own)

]]>

India Says LoC Status With China Intact

India on Monday said the future of its relationship with China will depend on mutual sensitivity to “each other’s core concerns” even as New Delhi stated that there will be no change in status of Line of Control with China.

Speaking at the 4th India-China Media Forum in Beijing, External Affairs Minister S Jaishankar said that the leaders of the two countries had agreed that the “differences should not become disputes”.

His remarks came days after China objected to Ladakh being made a Union Territory and asked India and Pakistan to avoid actions that “unilaterally change the status quo” and exacerbate tensions. Jaishankar also expressed concern over India’s trade deficit in the bilateral trade and called for greater access to India’s pharmaceutical and IT products and services in the domestic Chinese market.

Meanwhile in New Delhi, the Centres issued a statement that read: “There was no implication for either the external boundaries of India or the Line of Actual Control (LAC) with China. India was not raising any additional territorial claims.”

The two countries share border running into more than 3,000 km.

Jaishankar, who met Chinese Vice President Wang Qishan in the morning, said they discussed evolving global situation and the larger rebalancing that reflects the rise of India and China as two large developing countries.

Referring to his meeting with Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi, Jaishankar said the two sides discussed the full gamut of issues including international situation, regional aspects and the bilateral relations.

He said the discussions were significant as the two sides prepare for President Xi Jinping’s visit to India for the 2nd Informal Summit later this year and celebrating the 70th Anniversary of the establishment of diplomatic relations next year.

Referring to the informal summit between Prime Minister Narendra Modi and the Chinese President in Wuhan in April last year, he said it was “a historic meeting” that has provided positive direction to the bilateral relations.

“There is a mutual agreement that as two of the largest and fastest-growing developing countries, representing almost one-third of the global population, stable and balanced development of our relations will not only be beneficial for our two peoples but also a factor of stability in this uncertain global environment. Our two countries have similar goals in terms of providing better opportunities for our peoples,” he said.

Jaishankar said there has been progress in an overall relationship since the Wuhan summit.

“The two countries agree that the maintenance of peace and tranquillity in border areas is essential for the smooth development of our relations. For this, the two armed forces have enhanced communication and are implementing various confidence-building measures,” he said.

The minister said that it is natural as neighbours and large developing economies that there would be issues in bilateral ties.

“The future of the India-China relationship will obviously depend on mutual sensitivity to each other’s core concerns. It is natural, both as neighbours and large developing economies that there would be issues in our ties. Properly managing differences is therefore vital. As our leaders agreed in Astana, differences should not become disputes. That is how India-China relations can remain a factor of stability in an uncertain world,” he said.

He said the positive direction of ties after the Wuhan Summit has opened up a world of new convergences.

“Exploiting this and taking our ties to a new level will require strong public support in both societies. The media can make a major contribution to that goal,” he said.

Jaishankar said the economic relationship between the two countries has seen some progress.

“The bilateral trade has increased but so too has our deficit, which is a matter of some concern. We appreciate the steps taken in the last few months by the Chinese side to enhance imports from India. These efforts could expand to include measures to enable greater access for our pharmaceutical and IT products and services in the domestic Chinese market,” he said.

Referring to the second meeting of the high-level Mechanism on Cultural and People-to-People Exchanges co-chaired by him and the Chinese Foreign Minister, he said it was an outcome of the consensus reached between Prime Minister Modi and President Xi Jinping during the Wuhan summit.

“It reflects our shared agreement that enhancing and strengthening cultural and people-to-people exchanges would contribute to the overall development of our bilateral relations,” he said.
(ANI)

]]>

Kashmir Prays On Eid Amid Clampdown

Hundreds thronged local mosques in Srinagar on Monday to offer namaz on the occasion of Eid-ul-Adha even while curfew was imposed in different parts of Kashmir as the situation remained tense.

Bakra Eid or Bakrid is marked by sacrificing an animal that is close to them to prove their devotion and love for Allah.

In Srinagar, a large number of devotees gathered at mohalla mosques to offer prayers, amid tight security.

Stating that Eid prayers concluded peacefully in the region, Kashmir Zone Police tweeted, “Eid prayers concluded peacefully in various parts of the valley. No untoward incident reported so far.”

Earlier on Sunday, Srinagar District Magistrate Shahid Choudhary had met Imaams for prayer arrangements on the eve of Eid and said he is conscious of the fact that it needs a lot more for a normal and enjoyable Muslim festivity.

Choudhary, who visited venues where prayers would be offered, said he is trying to reduce inconvenience and ease facilities.

“I am conscious of the fact it needs a lot more for a normal and enjoyable Eid. We are trying to reduce inconveniencies and ease facilities. Just had an elaborate meeting with Imaams for prayer arrangements. Visited venues,” he tweeted on Sunday.

The Parliament recently withdrew special status to the state and passed the Jammu and Kashmir (Reorganization) Act 2019, reorganising the state in two Union Territories — Jammu and Kashmir with legislature and Ladakh without it.

(ANI)

]]>

Kerala Floods: 72 Dead, 2.5 Lakh Displaced

Incessant rains that triggered flooding has claimed 72 lives across the state, according to a district-wise data between August 8 and August 11 of the Kerala State Disaster Management Authority (KSDMA).

KSDMA has released the data which states that 58 people were still missing as the state continues to battle with flood fury.

Malappuram remained the most affected district where 23 people have lost their lives while 50 were still missing till Sunday evening.

Over 2.5 people across 14 districts affected from heavy downpour while 32 people sustained injuries due to flood-related incidents.

Congress leader Rahul Gandhi, who represents Wayanad constituency in the Lok Sabha, is on a two-day visit to review the relief measures in the district.

Taking to Facebook, Gandhi appealed people to donate water bottles, sleeping mats, blankets, sanitary napkins, biscuits, rice, sugar, vegetables at different collection centres in Malappuram district.

“An Appeal My Parliamentary Constituency, Wayanad, has been devastated by floods with thousands left homeless and shifted to relief camps. We are in urgent need of the following material: Water bottles…..” he wrote on Facebook.

IMD has predicted “heavy rainfall” at isolated parts over Kerala from August 12 till August 16. The meteorological department also advised fishermen not to venture into those areas.

“Strong winds, speed reaching 45-55 kmph, are likely to prevail over southwest, central and north Arabian Sea and along & off Kerala, Karnataka, Goa, Maharashtra, Gujarat coasts, Lakshadweep area, south Tamilnadu coast and Andaman & Nicobar Islands. Squally weather likely to prevail over West Bengal and Odisha coasts. Fishermen are advised not to venture into these areas,” the IMD bulletin said.

(ANI)

]]>
India China Relations

Jaishankar In China To Discuss Ties

External Affairs Minister Subrahmanyam Jaishankar met his Chinese counterpart Wang Yi in Beijing on Monday and discussed regional and global issues of mutual interest.

Jaishankar’s visit comes amid heightened tensions between India and Pakistan following the scrapping of Article 370 that gave special status to Jammu and Kashmir and bifurcation of the state into two Union Territories — Jammu and Kashmir and Ladakh.

Jaishankar, who is currently on a three-day visit to China to co-chair the second meeting of the India-China High-Level Mechanism (HLM) on cultural and people-to-people exchanges, said India’s relationship with China has a unique place in global politics and through years, “our leaders have worked to recognise this reality”.

This is Jaishankar’s first visit to China after assuming office in May this year. He arrived here on Sunday.

The External Affairs Minister along with Wang will prepare the ground for the second informal summit between Prime Minister Narendra Modi and Chinese President Xi Jinping scheduled to be held later this year.

The decision to establish the HLM was taken during the maiden informal summit between Modi and Xi in Wuhan in April last year. The inaugural HLM meeting was held on December 21 last year in New Delhi.

“The second HLM meeting will provide an opportunity to follow up on the outcomes of the first HLM meeting and discuss new initiatives for enhancing people-to-people exchanges between our two countries,” the Ministry of External Affairs had said in a statement.

In his meeting with Wang, Jaishankar reiterated, “Deep, consultative and open views were shared between our leaders at Wuhan summit last year.”

He had met his Chinese counterpart in Bangkok last month on the sidelines of ASEAN Summit where both leaders had exchanged views on ways and means of further strengthening India-China relations.

Pakistan had last week downgraded bilateral relations with India and suspended bilateral trade.

Ahead of Jaishankar’s visit, his Pakistani counterpart Shah Mehmood Qureshi had visited Beijing to raise the Kashmir issue with the Chinese leadership and seek its support to take the matter to the United Nations. (ANI)

]]>
Celebrate Article 370

‘I Celebrate Article 370 Abrogation’

Aditi Bhan is a Kashmiri Pandit who was forced to migrate to Delhi in 1990 as a child, along with her family in Kashmir. She explains why Kashmiri Pandits finally have a reason to be happy

Article 370 now stands null and void. Kashmiri Pandits had been campaigning against the Aricle for years. And now when Kashmiri Pandits are celebrating, many journalists and Kashmiri Muslims, are openly stating that Pandits are happy because they are viewing it as a revenge for their exodus. Some even asking us (KPs) how’s this move going to ensure our return to the valley?  

I want to ask these people – Why should we, Kashmir Pandits, not be happy? We were thrown out of our houses and reduced to being a refugee in our own country. No one spoke about us, for us. The world remained a mute spectator to our exodus. What would you have done had this happened to you? At least, we did not pick up guns unlike others. Instead, we chose a peaceful way to set things right. And you call that revenge? 

Well then, call it what you like. But let me tell you, we are happy because this step gives us hope that we can now return to our homeland. And I, in my capacity as a Kashmiri Pandit and not as a Kashmiri woman (Thank God! There’s consensus, over the fact that the act was unfair to women), will tell you how.

I was in my pre-teens when I witnessed our exodus in 1990. My experiences in 1989-90 left me bitter about the place, its majority Muslim population. It shattered my trust in Muslims. And for years, I thought of Muslims as anti-Indian. It took me more than a decade and a number of interactions with Indian Muslims, to realise that the latter are as loyal to India as me or any KP. But even after all these years, I could never feel the same about Kashmiri Muslims. 

Twenty three years after our migration, I mustered enough courage to visit my homeland, Kashmir, for the first time in 2013 along with some of my family members. The violence that had engulfed the state during my childhood had worn out the state, its people. During my interaction with the local Muslims, I could sense their present-day sentiments – some detested our presence; some repented the violence committed against Pandits and hoped for our return; and some wanted peace to return to the valley. A large number wanted to be with India. But despite this visible change among people, I never felt absolutely safe among them. 

During my week-long stay there, not even once did I sleep properly. Even a whisper outside would wake me up, for it bought back memories of 19 January 1990 (the night when the whole valley reverberated with the war-cries of Islamists). No matter how nice the local muslims were to us, I found it hard to trust them. I was simply incapable of doing that, given my childhood experiences. And given my distrust, how could I even consider living with them again. This holds true for almost every Kashmiri Pandit, who had been on the receiving end of terrorism. Even if Delhi had given us free houses and hefty compensations, we would still not have gone back. We just do not feel safe there. There was no reason to believe that history won’t repeat itself. Especially, when terrorists had been quite vocal against our return.

Coming back to the question, how scrapping of Article 370 changes things for us? It paves the way for all Indians to go to Kashmir. With more pro-Indian people in the valley, we will not feel isolated, suffocated, and trapped in a hostile region. This in turn will give confidence to all those local Muslims, who want to live with India but are scared to say that because of the fear of anti-Indian elements. With more Indians there, the anti-Indian elements will have a reason to be fearful, not us. And this is why we are celebrating. And so is every pro-Indian Kashmiri that includes Muslims too.