New Zealand 40th Prime Minister

Jacinda Ardern: A Graceful Goodbye

Not every leader quits the political power establishment with grace and dignity. Not every leader would easily leave the addiction of power to yet again become a mum, a beloved, a sister, and a back-bencher. Like Jacinda Ardern, former prime minister of New Zealand.

Apart from grace and elegance, she brought in the warm hug, for everyone, including her colleague in the Labour Party, Chris Hopkins, the new prime minister. She also ushered into the realm of power politics, which the people of New Zealand and the world watched with great respect — the eternally life-affirming principles of hope, humanism, kindness and empathy. Her individual life and times while holding power, became a collective dream of an entire nation-state and its people.

Indeed, that is why her everyday public conduct, despite the vicious post-Covid Rightwing trolls, and her goodbye meeting with children and mothers, including people from the indigenous communities, wishing her a deeply-felt farewell, was covered by the entire world media, especially in the West. Now, how many departing heads of countries which are not big players in international finance, politics and diplomacy, which are not superpowers, have found such a warm, almost tearful farewell to a prime minister? If anything, it proves that those who conduct their politics and ‘way of life’ as egoistic bullies or narcissist dictators, and whose adrenaline are driven by the blind following of a fanatic and negative herd mentality, need to learn a lesson from Jacinda Ardern. Will they?

Look at Donald Trump. Look at the mess he has left behind, even while he is backed fanatically by white supremacists who hate the Blacks and immigrants, trapped in a cesspool of charges, and who continues to deny Joe Biden’s victory. Certainly, now, he will not get to be the sole Republican contender in the next presidential polls.

Like him, another former president who publicly denied the deadly pandemic which led to several people dying in America of Covid, Jair Bolsonaro of Brazil, his friend and ally, and who still lives in denial after the victory of Luiz Inacio Lula, allowed thousands to die in his country. Now, having fled to Florida, his fanatic Rightwing followers did a similar public spectacle, as in Ameica, of going violently berserk in the Parliament and Supreme Court of Brazil, with hundreds now cooling their heels in prison.

Even Barack Obama, the first Black president of the USA, who became a global icon of change, optimism and articulation, did not get this kind of mass adulation when he quit, even after two terms. He, of course, did not fulfill the grand vision or the sweet dreams which he had promised, not even for his own community, and he got trapped in the bloody war in Syria which led to large-scale devastation and mass human suffering and migrations. Besides, he left Libya in a mess.

ALSO READ: Naveen Patnaik – The Accidental Chief Minister

Ardern, after all, did not even complete her full term. As she quit, she said: “I’m leaving, because with such a privileged role comes responsibility – the responsibility to know why you are the right person to lead and when you are not. I know what this job takes. And I know that I no longer have enough in the tank to do it justice. It’s that simple.”

How many heads of State can speak this language?

Even an anti-joke in the farewell of Ardern seemed full of warmth where her ‘star power’ was in full display. “It’s like ‘touch her cloak, touch her cloak like Jesus,” a woman laughed to her friend, reported The Guardian of London.

“I would hate for anyone to view my departure as a negative commentary on New Zealand,” she said. “I have experienced such love, compassion, empathy and kindness in the job. That has been my predominant experience. So I leave feeling gratitude for having this wonderful time for so many years… My only words are words of thanks.”

One of the most remarkable ‘national event’ which was conducted by the people of her country, led by her, in a realm where xenophobia, racism, white supremacist ideology and fundamentalism of various hues seems to have spread in the global landscape, was after 50 people were massacred at two mosques in Christchurch, New Zealand. Across the country, women chose to wear headscarves, reflecting their collective support and solidarity for their fellow Muslim citizens. “It was a heartwarming signature stamped across the faces of the women of New Zealand, including its Prime Minister, Jacinda Ardern, who wore a headscarf too, and much earlier, as a leader of a secular nation where all communities are respected and are allowed to live with freedom and dignity,” I wrote in my column then in Lokmarg.

She wore a a black scarf, while hugging the mourning members of the Muslim community, with deep emotion and sadness, spreading a sense of healing across the community, and sending a signal to all concerned who celebrate murder and mayhem in the name of xenophobia. Indeed, women cops wore a head scarf too – holding a gun, while the meeting to mourn the dead was being held.

A doctor in Auckland said (Reuters, March, 2019): “I wanted to say — ‘We are with you, we want you to feel at home on your own streets, we love, support and respect you’”.

Said Bell Sibly in Christchurch: “Why am I wearing a headscarf today? Well, my primary reason was that if anybody else turns up waving a gun, I want to stand between him and anybody he might be pointing it at. And I don’t want him to be able to tell the difference, because there is no difference.”

Compare this with India where Muslim schoolgirls are denied their dream for higher education because they are targeted by banning the Hijab in schools in BJP-ruled Karnataka. Compare this with brilliant, young Muslim scholars, who have stood by the Indian Constitution and have protested non-violently against the communal CAA, are still rotting in jail. Compare this to how mob-lynchers were garlanded by a Union minister, how the call for hate-driven revenge in public  platforms have become routine, how the minorities are being pushed to the wall in a secular democracy as second class citizens.

Compare this with how a BBC documentary is banned in an era of internet and social media where nothing can remain inaccessible, how everything gets cloaked behind the iron curtain of ‘pseudo nationalism’, where dissent and dissenters are punished. The lack of grace is as transparent as the absence of empathy and democracy.

A senior journalist once told me a story about how Jawaharlal Nehru was moving in his ‘convoy’ through Cannaught Place in Delhi when he saw two groups of people fighting on the street. He stopped his car and stopped the fight – such was his moral high ground.

Another journalist has told me a story that once Nehru was crossing a town in Himachal Pradesh and he was ‘greeted’ by crowd of government employees who were protesting. Nehru got down from his car and he did what? He scolded the protesters and told them to go back to work, saying that their demands will be sympathetically heard, and that they should not waste their precious time, which, instead, should be devoted for the welfare of the country. The protesters dispersed.

Similarly, Mahatma Gandhi, in his writings and his politics, has often openly accepted his contradictions and imperfections. Even if a journalist would ask a difficult question, like the links of Congress with big money businessmen, he would accept it, and tell the truth.

Come to think of it, even Donald Trump, despite a hostile press, would routinely answer tough questions in his press conferences in the White House. That is the sign of a robust democracy, despite all the contradictions hidden within the inequalities of advanced capitalism.

Indeed, it is easy to become a dictator. However, it could be much easier to become a true democrat and humanist, with deep love for the masses, a connect with the social conscience, while celebrating the eternal values of empathy and compassion. Jacinda Ardern, in her sudden goodbye, tells us of this sublime realism.  

Read more: http://13.232.95.176/

Five Things That Happened Last Week (And What to Make of Them)

Jacinda Ardern and the fine art of exiting office

The MP, former minister and Congress Party leader, Jairam Ramesh, who will turn 70 next year, posted an interesting tweet on his timeline the other day. News had broken about New Zealand’s prime minister Jacinda Ardern, 42, who had announced that she was stepping down from her post as the country’s leader on account of what can be described as burnout. Announcing her decision, Ardern had said: “I believe that leading a country is the most privileged job anyone could ever have, but also one of the more challenging. You cannot and should not do it unless you have a full tank plus a bit in reserve for those unexpected challenges.”

Ramesh’s tweet lauded that decision and said: “Legendary cricket commentator, Vijay Merchant once said about retiring at the peak of his career: Go when people ask why is he going instead of why isn’t he going. Kiwi PM, Jacinda Ardern has just said she is quitting following Merchant’s maxim. Indian politics needs more like her.” Great point, that, about Indian politics. The thing, however, is that in his own party, the recently elected president, Mallikarjun Kharge is 80; and although she has stepped down from the president’s position, Sonia Gandhi who continues to be the real supremo of the party is 76 and keeps indifferent health. What’s more, her son, Rahul, who enjoys the privilege of being a sort of on-and-off leader of the party is 52 and is considered to be young and still evolving.

But then that is the story of Indian politics. India is a young country but its politicians are old, many of them dodderingly so. In 2022, the median age of an Indian was 28.7 years, compared to 38.4 for China and 48.6 for Japan. Yet, even though 65% of Indians are below the age of 35, the average age of its MPs has been over 50 for decades. And, typically, the so-called “young” nation’s leaders have been pretty old. Take, Prime Minister Narendra Modi. Next September, he will turn 73. And, although the average age of his council of ministers has dropped from 61 to 58, most of his key ministerial colleagues are 60-plus. Contrast that with the fact that government officers in India have to retire at 58 or 60; Supreme Court judges at 65; and high court judges at 62.

Let’s go back to New Zealand. Ardern, who has indicated that burnout is the main reason she is hanging up her boots has, since she assumed office in 2017, handled several big challenges (albeit in a small country with a population of around 5 million) including a terror attack, the global pandemic, a volcanic explosion and so on. She also had a daughter during her term and created ripples when she brought her to the United Nations during an official visit. Yet, at 42, she has decided that it is time to call it quits.

Calling it quits is, however, not in the DNA of most Indian political leaders and even bureaucrats. Most of them are unable to reconcile to a life without the trappings of power. That is why we see fair numbers of bureaucrats jockeying into politics when their official bureaucratic tenures reach the end. Many, with the right sycophantic credentials, end up as governors of states or head commissions or secure similar sinecures where the perks and status that they enjoyed during their earlier careers can still be somewhat intact.

So Ramesh (the tweeting politician mentioned before) is quite right actually. Indian politics needs more people like Ardern who don’t cling on to power after their fizz has turned flat. But then the onus for doing so is with people like him and his ilk.

New BBC docu on Modi raises hackles

A new two-part BBC documentary, titled ‘India: The Modi Question’, has, among other things, shows that a hitherto secret British government investigation into the 2002 Gujarat riots, which left over 1,000 people dead, found that Prime Minister Narendra Modi who was then the chief minister of Gujarat was “directly responsible” for the communal violence that had ravaged the state. The investigation, according to the BBC documentary, also found that the extent of the violence was much greater than what was reported and that the motive behind the riots was to purge Muslims.

While in the years after the riots rocked Gujarat, Indian courts have dismissed allegations against Modi and his then government in Gujarat, the shadow of the Gujarat riots and widespread violence against Muslims during that period has been haunting him and his former colleagues, notably the Union home minister Amit Shah who was also Gujarat’s home minister in 2002.

The BBC documentary was briefly streamed on YouTube but later yanked from the platform. Now it can be watched only on the BBC iPlayer that works within the UK and not outside that demarcated geography. Predictably, the documentary has been divisive. The official reaction of the Indian government has been to label it as propaganda that smacks of “a colonial mindset” and an anti-India stance by the British prime minister Rishi Sunak in order to prove his British loyalty. Liberal and left-leaning circles, however, have lauded the BBC for its investigative efforts to get to the truth behind the riots and the involvement of Modi and his government in Gujarat then. Meanwhile, in case you are wondering, much of India’s mainstream media have sided with the government’s view on the documentary.

Perhaps older politicians are better for India

Lakya Suryanarayana Tejasvi Surya, 32, is an Indian politician, a member of the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh, a Hindu nationalist paramilitary volunteer organisation, and a BJP MP in Parliament. He is also famously the man who opened the emergency exit door of an airplane while on board. Luckily, it did not lead to a disaster. Surya is believed to have said that his hand accidentally touched the handle of the emergency door and it opened.

To anyone who has flown on an aircraft, the emergency exit door usually is not touch sensitive. Also, opening it when a plane is not in an emergency situation is unlawful. Surya’s party colleague and aviation minister Jyotiraditya Scindia, however, made light of what could have been a disastrous thing by saying: “It’s important to look at the facts. The door was opened by him by mistake when the flight was on the ground and after all checks, the flight was allowed to take off. He also apologised for the mistake.”

As far as we know, Surya has not been censured or has had to pay for his “mistake”. Life goes on as normal for him as it usually does for most privileged members of India’s power elite when they break the law. But, (and see the segment on Jacinda Ardern above) perhaps India needs older, greying and wiser politicians rather than whippersnappers whose hands can wander when they are sitting in an aircraft.

Women wrestlers accuse coaches of sexual harassment

Brij Bhushan Sharan Singh, 66, is a six-time MP and head of the Wrestling Federation of India. He has also been recently accused of sexually harassing women wrestlers for many years. Women and men wrestlers who have been staging protests have alleged that Singh as well as coaches at the national camp for wrestling in Lucknow have been exploiting women wrestlers systematically.

Singh and others have, for the moment, denied the allegations but as investigations get going the truth will, hopefully, emerge. For a long time women in Indian sports have been discriminated against and this is not the first time that allegations of exploitation have been made. However, it is the first major concerted protest against people in power in India’s sports arena. One hopes that others will be inspired by such protests to open up about similar instances in other sports.

Google, ChatGPT and the imminent battle over AI-powered bots

I asked ChatGPT, a chat bot developed by OpenAI, an American artificial intelligence lab, which has become a big craze around the world: “What is Google Deep Learning?” In seconds, the bot replied: “Google Deep Learning refers to the various deep learning technologies and services developed by Google, such as TensorFlow and the Google Brain team. These technologies and services are used for a wide range of applications, including image and speech recognition, natural language processing, and predictive analytics. Google has also developed various deep learning models and algorithms, such as the Google Neural Machine Translation system and the Google DeepMind AlphaGo program, which have achieved significant breakthroughs in their respective fields.”

The reason why I asked ChatGPT that question was because of the imminent competition that it might face. Even as ChatGPT becomes a rage (it can answer any question as long as it pertains to pre-2021; it can write essays; create lyrics for songs; and almost everything that a human can do), Google, which has a subsidiary called DeepMind, is believed to be working on a ChatGPT killer that it claims to be better, faster and safer than ChatGPT. Must ask ChatGPT what it thinks of that!

Read more: http://13.232.95.176/