Auto Scrappage Policy & Shared Mobility

Whatever one may say about the quality of management of the economy by Indian finance minister Nirmala Sitharaman, she unfailingly chooses her words aptly irrespective of issues. Even then like politicians everywhere, she is vulnerable to landing herself in trouble, thanks to some media persons given to sensationalising by taking up a point from the raft of arguments she may be making to justify a development.

This happened with her a couple of years ago when she became a target of incessant attack in social media following a newspaper report saying that Sitharaman attributed automobile demand slackening to “millennials prefer not to commit to an EMI and instead prefer having Ola or Uber or taking the metro.” The report didn’t say that the minister also deliberated on impact of stricter emission norms for vehicles (Bharat Stage VI) and registration fees on car demand besides millennial mindset. Sitharaman, as a result, became a sacrifice at the altar of an incomplete report.

Notwithstanding all the brickbats targeted at Sitharaman, surprisingly mostly by the millennials, the ones born between 1980 and 1995, the net savvy upwardly mobile young Indians are increasingly opting for shared mobility and that trend continues to gather pace. This is a phenomenon common in developed and emerging economies, based on convenience, economy in travelling and support from local governments. Minister Sitharaman presented her analysis at the right time in September 2019 since in the earlier month Indian car sales, according to Society of Indian Automobile Manufacturers, nosedived 31.57 per cent to 196,524. August car sales fall was for tenth consecutive month rallying vehicle manufacturers to seek reliefs from the government.

The woes of the industry resulting from growing traction of e-hailing trips, chips shortages hurting production and postponement of car buying by middle class citizens due to the scare surrounding Covid-19 and its variants such as Delta and Omicron remain. For example, passenger vehicles sales in 2020-21 were down to 2,711,457 from 2,773,519 in the previous year. Last month sales were highly disappointing at a seven-year low at 215,000, down 19 per cent from 264,000 in November 2020.

The critics may say anything, but Sitharaman is meeting with growing support for her opinion on virtues of shared mobility. The other day the UK’s junior transport minister Trudy Harrison said owning a car was to become a fad of the past. Speaking at a virtual sustainability conference, she said owning a car was an “outdated 20th century thinking centred around private vehicle ownership. But she thought her country where, according to global database company Statista 63.5 million households out of a total of 80.7 million own at least one car is finally reaching a “tipping point where shared mobility in the form of car clubs, scooters and bike shares will soon be a realistic option for many of us to get around.” What Johnson said was all about laying down the obsession of private car ownership for “greater flexibility (in movement), with personal choice and low carbon shared transport.”

ALSO READ: Biofuel Push Will Aid Farmers, Cut Pollution

Harrison will not be easily laughed out of court. For she has tartly said: “Many things seem far-fetched until they aren’t and I believe the same is true for shared mobility.” At the Cop 26 UN climate change conference, the UK government has made commitment to bring down emissions to net zero by 2050 and towards this goal is a 5 billion sterling pound investment commitment to green transport. Her prime minister has a messianic zeal for cycling and the world saw a demonstration of that when Boris Johnson was filmed riding a bike at the recent Conservative Party conference in Manchester. Johnson’s belief in cycling underpinning good health and clean environment and his transport minister’s recent pronouncement are seen as signals to the UK phasing out use of petrol and diesel cars by 2030. Incidentally, cars have a share of 13 per cent of the UK’s greenhouse emissions.

Reaching that target will be conditional upon carmakers’ capacity to fully migrate to electric vehicles, creation of a countrywide infrastructure of battery charging stations and incentives to be doled out by the government to encourage people to send petrol/diesel cars for scrapping.

But what about India? Take Delhi or Mumbai or Kolkata, the single biggest source of city pollution is emissions from vehicles, many of which wear the tag ELV (end of life vehicle) ready for being consigned to auto recycling yard for recovery of metals such as steel, aluminium and copper. Growing numbers of vehicles left in the open for lack of proper garage space and their open air cleaning are both a public nuisance and a contributor to pollution. After many years of deliberations, the government finally has an automobile recycling policy in place that says more than 15 year old commercial vehicles and cars that have aged 20 years, irrespective of fuel in use will be headed for recycling yard if these fail an automated fitness test.

While the scrappage policy is good news for the automobile industry, it at the same time has to contend with Delloite’s global automotive consumer study saying that the Indian youth are to bring about a “tectonic shift” towards shared mobility services. Remember, people in age groups of 25-44 and 45-64 constitute two major portions of Indian population who commute for work on a daily basis and their travel preferences will have a major bearing on shared mobility. In the meantime, Morgan Stanley says by 2030 India will witness a kind of expansion of shared mobility services to become a global leader in the field. “The proportion of shared miles will reach 35 per cent of all the miles travelled in the country, and this will further increase to 50 per cent by 2040,” says the investment banker.

Many, however, believe that once the internet services beyond the major cities become stable, shared mobility will be embraced by people in the rest of the country. This will further raise the shared mobility’s claim (in terms of percentage) to the total miles travelled.  The American mobility service provider Uber and the home grown Ola have found millennials as committed customers and their clientele that now includes the middle aged and elderly is growing rapidly in the post Covid-19 second wave. This being the reality, automobile makers must get ready to face the structural challenges coming from the two major aggregators and also some small localised service providers.

A ‘strategic assessment of shared mobility market in India’ by consulting and market research firm Frost & Sullivan says both fleet size and revenues from shared mobility services will grow strongly to 2025 and likely beyond as more and more people are getting hooked on to e-hailing because of convenience and economy in commuting compared with owning a car. It expects the fleet size of such services in India to become 4.7 million by 2025 from around 2 million in 2019. A global market study of the emerging business by a separate agency has forecast that the shared mobility market valued at $412.2 billion in 2020 is to become $730.2 billion by 2028. This survey says government urgings that people used share mobility services are the “biggest growth driver” for the business whose origin could be traced to Switzerland of the 1940s and then to the shared micro-mobility offerings such as bicycles in some European countries in the 1960s.

Weekly Update: Modi’s Mission 2070; Fuss Over Sikhs For Justice

2070 Only 50 Years Away

Normally a man used to whisking a magic wand at midnight and policy getting implemented within 10 sec past 12, Modiji seems to have done some unique yoga pose to have given a calm, patient and thoughtful five decades notice for the zero emission climate change goal. Ecstatic, Britain’s born again imperialist, Boris, was driven to endless hugs with Modiji as he felt he had achieved one promise in the COP 26 meetings that was worthy of looking forward to.

What can humanity want more than a slow burning ray of hope as it dies with congested overheated lungs, water up to its knees and praying to live up to the momentous year, 2070 when a new yug will dawn. Then the world will change and those still left with a few functioning alveoli can recover without Oxygen cylinders.

Modiji’s promise to deliver by 2070 has been more than a notch in British Prime Minister’s achievement at COP26. Boris committed UK to net zero by 2050. Greta’s school warriors were not happy. Too late they said. Now Modiji has added another two decades making Boris’s promise look, ‘ASAP by tomorrow’.

It is a great relief for Boris. Most middle class school age English Girls like to go on a ‘discover yourself’ extended round India tour. A chink in Greta’s army. So they are not going to say ‘Modi Hai Hai’. Which means Boris wins as he can say I am reaching the goal post faster than ‘my huggy friend Modi’. Meanwhile Modi, ‘Hugs r Us’, knows he doesn’t have to deliver.

Unless Jeff Bezos’s money finds the magic elixir of eternal life, both Boris (57) and Modi (71) will be long gone into another world beyond before 2070. So they won’t even be here to be called out.

Brilliant stroke of strategy by the Indian PM and a quick take on opportunity if ever by Boris, a person never to let one pass by. No doubt Greta was walking the streets with her force at the weekend frustrated.

Panic Over A Paper Tiger

If some of the media coverage of the Khalistan Referendum held in London are to be believed, the National Security Advisors of UK and India are to meet and spend quite some time over something that has the relevance of a meteor in the third galaxy away.

The world of Indian security threats must be near nirvana if Khalistan Referendum is the most pressing issue giving Mr Doval sleepless nights. No wonder the Sikhs for Justice (SFJ) have boasted of being a real danger to the mental state of India’s rulers.

The Indian State, used to throwing people in cells for just using constitutional rights such as free speech or civil rights or judicial judgements, can’t fathom why other countries don’t do the same for India. One Indian media even went as far as, ‘doesn’t Johnson understand that this (not stopping Khalistan Referendum) could affect India – UK relations!’

Apparently the Indian Foreign Secretary used most of his press conference at Glasgow to attack the ‘Khalistan Referendum’.  Allegedly even PM Modi raised this issue with PM Johnson, obviously seeing it as a greater threat to the Globe than climate issues. Climate can wait till 2070, but freedom of expression! How can that be permitted in United Kingdom, especially for Sikhs! Boris must have been lost for words for the first time, standing on SNP ground, Glasgow and being asked by Indian PM to stop an independence campaign. Did PM Modi think of the irony of his demand, if he did indeed make it?

There appears to be a bit of misunderstanding between the two countries on democracy, article 19, freedom of speech and the United Nations Declaration on Human Rights. As many an Indian journalist and news media will say behind closed doors, freedom of speech in India means ‘freedom as tolerated’ by the Government of the day. From Indira to Modi, it has been interpreted as such.

In UK, freedom of speech is, well, anything that a person wants to say regardless of what Government prefers. Sometimes it can lead to litigation by individuals named by an overzealous free speech wallah. But government doesn’t have that luxury. Nor does British police, Army or secret Services oblige Government by incarnating or knocking off a person who campaigns against Boris, the Queen, the State or even House of Lords.

Somewhere during transfer of power in 1947, this aspect of democracy wasn’t hammered home properly. So repeatedly Indian officials and PM’s insist that UK, USA and even UN follow India’s interpretation of freedom of speech. It wants the whole human rights world to accept Indian constitutional concept of any campaign or desire for freedom to be labelled as sedition!

The focus on the Khalistan Referendum, the over reaction by Indian officials in its various embassies is bizarre. It exposes an abnormal neurosis among decision and policy makers at the top of Indian security and ministerial team.

Referendums are held by Governments. UN doesn’t hold referendum unless the Security Council sanctions it and all five veto holding members agree. So what’s the panic all about? Civil society cannot hold ‘referendums’ any more than form ‘Parliaments’. They can hold pretend ones or engage in theatrical versions.

The Indian press has been shrieking that ISI is behind this and some even said that many Pakistanis voted in London in the ‘referendum that isn’t a referendum. Some even accuse China. The hysterical coverage is hilarious.

It will be foolish of Pakistan or China to be financing or helping with this non-referendum referendum. India can easily finance a Baluchistan referendum or even a Tibetan referendum in UK in retaliation if any of these countries consider raising the issue at UN.

But if Modi and Doval think that a paper referendum with no legal or political value is the greatest threat India is facing while being surrounded by hostile countries on all its borders and a Islamic State (ISIS) considering launching a strategy of attacks within India from basis in Afghanistan, one can only think of the last days of the Mughal Empire. The Emperor would not look at real threat from colonialists but concentrated on pointless small ones in his Kingdom.

As for NSA India raising this with NSA UK, it will be better for High Commissioner of India (HCI) I to talk to Priti Patel, Britain’s Home Minister, who, despite being alleged to be a Modi fan, will tell the HCI, that there is nothing she can do. British law interprets freedom of expression as it literally means.

The more India reacts, by labelling SFJ as terrorist and the referendum as a ‘great threat’ on par with border attacks by China, the more Sikh nationalists around the world participate in it. If all it takes to create panic in India is to put a cross on a paper with no teeth in London, why not do it again and again. That’s what many say. It is more than surrealist. If China is financing it, their officials must be having a real laugh.