Xi Tightens His Grip Over China

Xi Jinping More Powerful Than Mao Zedong: Analysts

Chinese Communist Party leader Xi Jinping’s historic third term as China’s President will likely see more hardline policies out of Beijing on the economy, foreign relations, and human rights, analysts told Washington-based Radio Free Asia (RFA).

On Sunday, Communist Party Xi Jinping presented the Party’s new central leadership at the Great Hall of the People in Beijing, where he secured a historic third term as the country’s top leader.
Top aides of Xi were promoted in Communist Party of China’s Politburo Standing Committee but no woman could find a place in the top leadership position for the first time in years, according to the newly released list by state media.

Through the 20th National Congress, the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) has demonstrated that Chairman Xi Jinping is the nucleus of power in China and that none can dare stand against him.

Xi had packed the Politburo Standing Committee with his close allies showing that he can now act as he pleases, according to Germany-based ethnic Mongolian rights activist Xi Haiming.

“This is the last madness,” Xi Haiming told a recent political forum in Taiwan. He said, “Xi has emerged, naked, as Emperor Xi, as a dictator.”

“Too many people in China are lining up to be his eunuchs, kowtowing to him, waiting for the emperor to ascend to the throne,” he was quoted as saying by RFA.

China is now firmly back in the Mao era, according to a Chinese journalist, who refused to be identified due to fear of reprisals.

“This 20th National Congress is the beginning of the Mao era,” Geng said. “People used to say it was the 9th National Congress of the Chinese Communist Party that was bad because it hailed Mao Zedong as the red sun.”

According to analyst Wen Zhigang, the old system of “collective leadership” is well and truly dead.

“Collective leadership no longer exists, and the leader sits, aloof … a leader of the people who is above the party,” Wen said.

According to senior China researcher Wu Guoguang, Xi has more say over who gets to be premier — his second-in-command Li Qiang — than the late supreme leader Mao Zedong did.

“Xi Jinping wields greater power to appoint his preferred premier than Mao Zedong did,” Wu told RFA. (ANI)

Read More:http://13.232.95.176/

Full Control Over Hong Kong Achieved: Xi Jinping

Chinese President Xi Jinping on Sunday told the 20th Communist party Congress that the country has gained full control over Hong Kong and turned it from chaos to governance, according to Reuters news agency.

Delivering a report to the twice-a-decade party meeting in Beijing, Xi said China has also waged a major struggle against Taiwan separatism and is determined and able to oppose territorial integrity.
Along with the crackdown on Hong Kong, Xi Jinping also defended the military aggression against Taiwan, saying he “safeguarded” the country’s “dignity and core interests” for ensuring security.

“In the face of turbulent developments in Hong Kong, the central government exercised its overall jurisdiction over the special administrative region as prescribed by China’s Constitution and the Basic Law of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region,” state media outlet Xinhua quoted Xi as saying.

He said it was ensured that Hong Kong is governed by “patriots” after the “order” was restored in the region.

On the self-governed island of Taiwan, he said, “In response to separatist activities aimed at Taiwan independence and gross provocations of external interference in Taiwan affairs, we have resolutely fought against separatism and countered interference.”

He said that China has demonstrated their resolve and ability to safeguard “China’s sovereignty and to oppose “Taiwan’s independence.”

Faced with “changes in the international landscape”, the Chinese President said the country has “maintained firm strategic resolve and shown a fighting spirit. “Throughout these endeavours, we have safeguarded China’s dignity and core interests and kept ourselves well-positioned for pursuing development and ensuring security.”

During his speech, Xi also defended his flagship COVID policy by saying his government put the people and their lives above all else and tenaciously pursued a zero-COVID policy.

“In responding to the sudden attack of COVID-19, we put the people and their lives above all else and tenaciously pursued a dynamic zero-COVID policy,” Xinhua quoted Xi as saying.

Regional experts say that Chairman Xi Jinping will undoubtedly extend his term in power for another five years.

He will either be re-elected as general secretary of the CCP or will be newly elected as chairman of the CCP, a title that has lain dormant since 1982 and was once the highest position ever held by Mao Zedong.

The congress is taking place at one of the most perilous periods in international affairs in recent years. A war is raging in Ukraine as President Vladimir Putin attempts to burnish his credentials as a great Russian leader, and China remains a staunch supporter of this would-be tsar.

At the same time, Taiwan Strait tensions are at their highest in decades, as China attempts to pummel Taipei into acquiescence.

Besides this, diplomatic tensions with the US, the after-effects of a global pandemic, China’s own par and efforts to stamp out COVID-19, and all the ingredients for a brewing storm are present. (ANI)

Read More:http://13.232.95.176/

China Censors Anti-Xi Protest Before Communist Party Cong

Chinese social media censors have blocked posts, keywords, and hashtags related to the extremely rare public protest ahead of a landmark Chinese Communist Party (CCP) meeting that is scheduled to begin on October 16, at which President Xi Jinping is expected to secure a historic third term.

Hong Kong media have remained largely muted on a rare protest in Beijing that called for the ousting of China’s leader Xi Jinping ahead of the historic 20th Communist Party congress. The meeting, a once-in-every-five-years event, is set to begin on Sunday and will likely see Xi secure an unprecedented third term, reported Hong Kong Free Press (HKFP).
The protest in Beijing involved banners denouncing Chinese President Xi Jinping and the country’s stringent COVID-19 policies.

On Thursday, reports emerged on the mainland that two banners had been draped across Sitong bridge – an overpass in the capital’s Haiding district. One of the banners, according to online images, called on people to go on strike to “oust the dictator, traitor Xi Jinping.”

Another banner meanwhile listed a range of grievances, including some against the country’s stringent Covid-19 restrictions. “We want food, not PCR tests. We want freedom, not lockdowns. We want respect, not lies. We want reform, not Cultural Revolution. We want a vote, not a leader. We want to be citizens, not slaves.”

International outlets such as Bloomberg, Reuters, and the Wall Street Journal reported on the incident, whilst it appeared as the top story on the BBC News website. It was also covered by Taiwanese media and independent platforms such as Initium, though the protest was ignored by mainstream Hong Kong outlets, reported HKFP.

The banners were removed quickly on the same day but photos were already being widely shared by netizens.

Chinese authorities, however, were swift to take down social media posts related to the incident, including those with keywords such as #Haidian, #Sitong bridge, and even #Beijing. There was also a police presence near the overpass afterward.

US-based Chinese writer Fang Shimin said on Twitter that the person who allegedly hung the banners was a man called Peng Lifa, who calls himself Peng Zaizhou online.

Fang claimed that Peng left comments on his previous posts before the protest, and shared similar content about protesting on the ResearchGate website. The content has now been deleted, Fang said, reported HKFP.

Following the censorship, people used another hashtag – #ISawIt – to communicate on China’s Twitter-like Weibo platform. But those were also removed, with some reporting that their account was permanently blocked.

When searching for the #ISawIt hashtag on Weibo, the platform showed a message that reads “[A]ccording to relevant laws and regulations, the topic page cannot be displayed,” reported HKFP.

Others meanwhile took to Twitter, saying the person who hung the banners was “brave.”

Hours after Thursday’s protest images went viral, state media commentator Hu Xijin said on Twitter that citizens supported the country’s leadership: “China’s political stability is solid, because the country is developing very well in general, and the vast majority of people support the CPC’s leadership, hoping for stability and opposing upheaval.” He did not make reference to the demonstration.

Beijing was on high alert on Friday against any disruption to a landmark Chinese Communist Party meeting where Xi is expected to secure a historic third term as president.

Armies of volunteers have been deployed in every neighbourhood in Beijing to report anything out of the ordinary, and parcels to subway commuters have been subjected to additional security checks. (ANI)

Read More:http://13.232.95.176/

The Big Daddy In China

Something peculiar and unprecedented is happening in perhaps one of the most advanced capitalist countries of the world – the People’s Republic of China, run by a totalitarian, one-dimensional and powerful regime led by the Communist Party of China. And it is certainly not a ‘Second Cultural Revolution’ which degraded and ravaged the lives of millions, including the educated youth, intellectuals, communists, literary figures, writers, musicians and artists, and veteran party leaders, among others. Besides, anything remotely western, including western classical music or literature, was abhorred and condemned.

The cultural revolution was implemented in the cities, towns and vast rural countryside of China, between 1966 and 1977, with Mao Tse Tung at the helm, and unleashed by the notorious ‘Gang of Four’. The gang was led by Mao’s fourth wife, Jiang Qing, also a former actress.

The ten-year project was enacted by the party cadres with devastating consequences, ostensibly to clean the party and society of ‘reactionary and bourgeois elements’, to resurrect the ‘original principles’ of Mao Tse Tung Thought, and to re-educate the educated youth and intelligentsia in urban areas and compel them to go and work for extremely long spells in rural countryside. All those deviating from the stated goals would be severely punished. President Xi Jinping was a student then; it is reported that his father, a committed party official holding important positions, too, was hounded and purged.

In the current circumstances, when it comes to the reality behind the Great Wall of China, it all seems trapped in a haze and maze of multiple contradictions, but no one really knows the real running story behind the iron curtain with total clampdown on freedom of expression and news. So much so, even the social media and internet is under State control. Indeed, an indiscreet or adventurous blogger, however anonymous, might land up in serious trouble if he-she, inadvertently, or otherwise, ruffles the feathers in the ubiquitous Chinese establishment. Undoubtedly, Big Brother is always watching.

However, something totally out of the ordinary is currently happening in China, which, till the other day, was celebrating its huge capitalist profit machine inside and outside the country, and, which had, since Deng Xiaoping, openly flaunted and encouraged the rise and rise of infinite private property and wealth, even while mass disparity and inequality was kept bottled-up and camouflaged by the iron fist of a dictatorial State apparatus.

Check out the bizarre events which have unfolded with its share of shadowy mysteries in recent times. It’s mind-boggling, and uncannily reminds of the dark memories of the cultural revolution.

Since the last two decades, top actress, director, pop singer and big business tycoon, beautiful billionaire Zhao Wei, has been a beloved of the country, a superstar bigger than the biggest names in Hollywood. Indeed, after capitalist reforms were ushered in the late 1970s, she had emerged as a national icon of the new ethos in China. Her films would gross millions in box office hits and her versatility and range as an actress was considered brilliant and kaleidoscopic.

Also known as Vicky, she was the catalyst behind award-winning and super hit movies, millions of her music albums were sold out across China and abroad, her big-time investments included hi-tech and entertainment ventures, while her fan-base almost hit the 100 million mark on Weibo, China’s microblogging site.

She was hailed with innumerable awards, and her personal earnings outstretched unimaginable heights. Her popular movies include, Lost in Hongkong, Hollywood Adventures, Red Cliff, Painted Skin, Dearest, Shaolin Soccer, My Fair Princess, Love, among others. She has been the main model of Fendi, the Italian fashion house, in China.

Besides, she was known to be a close buddy and partner of ‘Alibaba tycoon’, Jack Ma; she and her husband were apparently initial investors in Alibaba Pictures, with a $400 million stake, in 2015. It’s dark irony, that even Jack Ma seems to have suddenly lost his lustre in the eyes of the current dispensation in Beijing.

What is happening in Xi Jinping’s new China with its sudden new doctrine of ‘Long-term Common Prosperity’ with a deadly crackdown on big business, hi-tech companies, celebrities, top TV shows, and social media-online activities, especially among the young, therefore, acquires both sinister and mysterious overtones. And there are no two-minute answers, like Chinese noodles.

Zhao Wei has suddenly been banned in China, and no one knows why! Her name and references to her has been eliminated from social media platforms, film and television credits, from the media and social media: all the highly popular stuff associated with her iconic status in the film or television industry, including chat shows, have vanished into the blue, including from live streaming sites.

Another famous actor, Zhang Zhehan, has been banned as well. His name has been removed from the social media. One apparent mistake he has done is that he was seen in pictures visiting the Japanese shrine for those who died in the war: the Yasukini Shrine. Zheng Shuang, another box office hit star of the highly successful television serial, ‘Meteor Shower’ has been fined a whopping $46.1 million for tax evasion.

Online gaming has been strictly stopped, especially among the young, and severe restrictions have been imposed on the entertainment industry. Celebrating celebrities and ‘fandom’ too is a strict no-no these days.

Chinese authorities have openly announced that tax evasion by the rich and the celebrities will not be allowed – but China observers are wary of such quickly shifting high moral ground. These manifest signs of high morality in a country which has been brazenly celebrating its unbridled capitalism and economic conquests at home and abroad since the rapid economic reforms ushered in by Deng, are often too sudden, unpredictable and lacks rationality.

According to The Economist (October 16, 2021), ‘‘It is also true that the rich and famous are under harsher scrutiny than they have known for decades. Tycoons and film stars have received painful reminders that they enjoy their success at the party’s pleasure. Some have lost fortunes or seen careers ended for defying China’s leaders, or for provoking public opinion with displays of swaggering privilege. Others have hastened to donate money and time to patriotic causes. New rules ban effeminate actors from television and curb how many hours youngsters spend on video games. State power is now invested in one man, Mr Xi, in a way not seen since the Mao era. Whether issuing textbooks on Xi Jinping Thought to six-year-old children or using smartphone apps to ensure that officials study Mr Xi’s wisdom, the leader’s sternly paternal presence is felt in every corner of life…’’

Come September, even while the personality cult of Xi Jinping seems to be integral to the newest ‘manufactured consent’ across China, a new and interesting phenomenon has emerged at the grassroot level. Primary schools in China now have classroom indoctrination with ‘Xi Jinping Thought on Socialism with Chinese Characteristics for a New Era’. ‘Xi Yeye’ (Grandpa Xi) is looming large in the text books for pre-primary schools also. The tiny tots are too being told to listen to what Grandpa Xi is telling them.

The immortalisation of Xi Jinping, it seems, perhaps repositioning him as ‘President for Life’, is on – at full swing and fast forward – these days. Indeed, with his half-twisted, half-smile, hiding an indecipherable mind, only Grandpa Xi really knows – what he really wants.

Xi’s Comment On Taiwan Sends Ripples

China has sent a forceful message to the West, in fact the United States. It has been lost in all the other rhetoric that Chinese leader Xi Jinping thundered in the 100th anniversary of the Communist Party of China. President Jinping said that the party will ‘complete reunification of Taiwan with the mainland’ and hinted it could be by force. If China ends up doing this, it will be symbolic end of ‘American century’.

China has made similar reference to Taiwan every time a new leader takes over and repeated it almost every year. However, this year there is a seriousness that seems to have replaced caution that marked previous policy. Under President Xi there has been escalation of incursions into Taiwan air and sea territory, gradually encircling Taiwan or testing its defences.

Taiwan is a small State of some 35 million people, one of the densest populated in the world. China on the other hand has 1.4 Billion people and the world’s largest army. In a straight war, Taiwan would not last a day. But Taiwan has a sort of guarantor, that is the United States. This is perhaps the only reason Chinese troops haven’t walked into Taiwan.

The United States has a complex relationship with Taiwan. It has an ambiguous treaty with Taiwan called the Taiwan Relations Act that ensure that Taiwan can defend itself against any aggression by China. The treaty does not commit USA to defend Taiwan. The Act states “the United States will make available to Taiwan such defense articles and defense services in such quantity as may be necessary to enable Taiwan to maintain a sufficient self-defense capabilities”.

But there is an implicit threat further in the Act, It states that the United States will “consider any effort to determine the future of Taiwan by other than peaceful means, including by boycotts or embargoes a threat to the peace and security of the Western Pacific area and of grave concern to the United States”.

And further, ‘to maintain the capacity of the United States to resist any resort to force or other forms of coercion that would jeopardize the security, or the social or economic system, of the people on Taiwan.’ 

So the Act draws in the United States dependent on what the United States regional policy and interest are at the time rather than a defence treaty. Taiwan has relied heavily on this Act as a sort of guarantor against a forced takeover by China.

ALSO READ: Taiwan Becomes Meat In US-China Sandwich

China has to calculate what strategic importance the United States gives to the region and how important is Taiwan to USA in that regional interest at any time. China has a reputation for long thinking. Its policy is to make Taiwan of lesser value for USA so USA will avoid a full frontal war.

That policy has already been successfully applied by China in the case of Hong Kong. It refused to accept British sovereignty in Hong Kong, claiming the Island belonged to it. It was transferred in 1997 with Britain ensuring China committed to democracy, freedoms and capitalist system in Hong Kong. China then waited till Britain’s power in the world had waned significantly to break with the one nation two systems agreement. In 2021 the commitment has all but disappeared.

In his speech, President Xi also stressed that China does not interfere in other countries nor attack them. However, China considers Taiwan to be part of China with some legitimacy.

Taiwan was part of the Qing dynasty until 1895 when Japan invaded and took over the islands. Meanwhile in mainland China, the Qing dynasty was ended by revolutions in 1912. The Republic of China was established in 1916. Following further unrest, the country was united by General Chiang Kai-Sheik under the Kuomintang in 1920s. China was called the Republic of China, ROC. But the Kuomintang faced challenge by the Communist Party of China led by Mao Zedong. During second World War, there was truce between the two. With the defeat of Japan, Taiwan was returned to China.

However, the civil war between Kuomintang and CCP continued with the later winning in 1949 and establishing its control over all of mainland China. This was now called the People’s Republic of China, PROC. Chaing Ke-Sheik and a lot of his elite escaped to Taiwan where they established their Government. They claimed that mainland China belongs to them. On the other hand mainland China claims Taiwan belongs to it.

The Taiwan Government was considered to be the legitimate Chinese Government by the West and held the seat at the UN as a veto holding power. This was mainly American policy rather than British.

The situation was absurd to say the least and a reflection of American belligerence and opposition to communism. Finally as China became more powerful and USA needed to restore relations with China, the USA recognised People’s Republic of China as the real China. Mainland China took its place and veto power at UN in 1972. Consequently, Taiwan is not recognised as a sovereign country by UN except by some 14 countries. It engages with the world through Trade Mission Offices.

Chinese policy for reunification has been multipronged. It has blocked any formal defence pact between US and Taiwan and formal recognition of Taiwan as a sovereign country. Trade with China is important for USA. Regionally China has engaged in free flow of trade and travel between mainland China and Taiwan.

ALSO READ: Xi Jinping’s Chinese Exceptionalism

In some ways, Taiwan’s position is somewhat similar to that of Goa. Goa was a Portuguese territory. After independence, Indian request for Portugal to cede the territory to it was refused. India invaded it and annexed Goa in 1961. Portugal didn’t show up.  

Will Xi invade Taiwan as India did with Goa? Xi is more likely to send the Chinese Army into Taiwan to annexe it than any other Chinese leader in recent history. His incursions in Indian territory are a testament to that.

Currently the Chinese Government is still attempting to influence the democratic vote in Taiwan in its favour and peaceful annexation. There is also brain drain from Taiwan to mainland China as there are more opportunities in China for skilled and professional Taiwanese. Lifestyle is better and China is a highly developed country now.

However Xi’s patience will run out at some stage and the prospect of invasion will become imminent.

There is considerable debate within United States to shore up its presence in Taiwan. United States think tanks are divided between letting Taiwan go or US defending it. Those promoting defence of Taiwan think that a showdown in Taiwan will contain Chinese power. The pragmatists say that USA has to come to terms with Chinese power.

If there is a showdown between China and US, it will not affect China but Taiwan might not recover, even possibly be decimated. If US lets Taiwan be taken over, it will affect American prestige, for what is left after defeats in Afghanistan and Iraq. The best possible way forward is to avoid a war, have a hands off approach and let a peaceful process determine gradual entry of Taiwan into China.

As Tiananmen Psychosis Reaches Hong Kong…

Like everything this year, nothing was the same in Hong Kong on June 4, 2021. And, ironically, it was not because of the deadly second surge of the pandemic!

Certainly, in mainland China, or in the public spaces of Beijing, it is well-nigh impossible to remember even symbolically the anniversary of the Tiananmen Square massacre on June 4, 1989. No one can even utter the word in public. It’s abject silence – as if nothing happened!

Nothing happened?

Days before the anniversary falls, in China, the internet, which is anyway totally controlled by the government, is under strict surveillance, and so are university campuses, social media spaces and dissenters’ blogs, local or generated from abroad, while streets are sanitized and the official media becomes clinically more patriotic. Those remotely possible of creating dissent are allegedly picked up and packed off to unknown imprisonments, huge security is mobilized, the sprawling Tiananmen Square is virtually under siege, and the whole of China knows that ‘Big Brother is Watching You’.

However, the darkest irony is that for the first time in its history, Hong Kong witnessed a similar scenario as in mainland China this year, with exactly the same template of repression being replicated on its main streets and by-lanes, across residential areas and public spaces, outside famous landmarks and metro stations, and most especially in and around the Victoria Park, where tens of thousands would gather every year, since 1989, under the post-colonial British rule or under the ‘take-over’ Chinese regime later, to mark the anniversary of the Tiananmen Square massacre.

They would all gather, like a sea of humanity, with candles and flashlights, messages and graffiti, placards and posters, street plays and performances, music and songs, speeches and silences, holding hands, shouting slogans, crying in sorrow, and in homage and tribute to the memory of the dead, tortured and jailed, angry and in angst. This collective symphony each year remembered the peaceful protesting young who were slaughtered by the Chinese tanks and guns on June 4, 1989 at Beijing only because they wanted more democracy and freedom of expression, speech and ideas in their country.

More democracy and freedom of expression! Was it such a ghastly crime, then? And why does it continue to remain such a ghastly crime three decades and plus later, for a regime which calls itself ‘communist’ with its entrenched totalitarian and dictatorial systems of governance, even while becoming one of the most dynamic and undisputed leaders of advanced capitalism in post-modern globalization?

ALSO READ: ‘Hong Kong Turning Into China-Run Communist City’

In Hong Kong last year, most key pro-democracy leaders, young and old, were picked up. Some were picked up after the June 4 events last year when they gathered in solidarity. Many of them are still in jail, according to reports.

Many of those who led the protracted movement against the move to make Hong Kong ‘embedded’ with mainland China, have also been reportedly packed off to prison, even journalists, and one particular dissenting and brave media owner. Independent media outfits have been shut down, and dissent has been crushed.

The pandemic was used to block all acts, even symbolic acts, of solidarity with the Tiananmen Square massacre this year. The pandemic was nothing but a ploy, locals said, because other gatherings have been allowed in the recent past. A solitary old woman, the famous ‘grandma’ of the earlier Hong Kong protests, who came with a placard in the main square in early June this year, was picked up soon after. A woman barrister linked with the protests was arrested. Thousands of cops were on the streets and road blocks were everywhere. There were open warnings of individual and mass arrests. Hong Kong had not seen any such thing in its entire history under the British or later under the Chinese. This was unprecedented.

Talking to the Guardian, political journalist Ching Cheong, who was jailed in China for three years, said Hong Kong had made it “the conscience of China”. “It’s very sad to see that, starting last year, authorities have tried to stamp out memorial activity purely for the selfish sake of the CCP to cling to power,” Ching said. “I don’t think marking the anniversary of the crackdown itself will lead to the collapse of the communist regime, but it is evident proof (that) the regime is extremely afraid of people knowing the atrocities that it has committed.”

And, yet, like magic realism, the protests happened. Yes, it did happen, and the global media and social media reported it visually, and in text.

Number 4 and 6, to mark the day and month (June 4), were written on switch boards. Flashlights and mobiles were used to light up neighbourhoods and deserted streets. Some individuals gathered outside the Victoria Park and flashed their mobiles despite the fear of mass arrests and imprisonment. Candles were lit up on balconies and streets. Solitary artists performed in public spaces, often in stark silence. Flowers were offered and candles were lit outside landmarks in university campuses. Zoom meetings were organized online outside China and solidarity protests were held all over — online. And, most crucially, the US consulate and the European Union lighted symbolic candles in their premises on June 4, in the heart of Hong Kong, much to the anger and outrage of the Chinese government.

So what does it finally prove? What are the lessons for dictators and tyrants who compulsively choose to swim against the current of modernity, democracy and freedom, many of them using the pandemic as a ploy?

One, it proves that even one of the most powerful, secretive and repressive regime, which has usurped the entire media into a loyalist mouthpiece and shut down vast networks of independent media,  just cannot stop the vast humanity’s voice for truth, compassion and justice.

ALSO READ: Journalist Recounts China Escape: ‘All Under Watch’

Two, the resurrection of memories is relentless and endless. Memories don’t die, recorded and unrecorded memories, integral to the oral tradition of mainland China, Hong Kong and of those dissenters in exile in other countries. Memories still float — as testimony.

Three, tens of thousands of the young in the summer of June at Tiananmen Square in Beijing, next to the forbidden kingdom on one side and Mao’s mausoleum on the other, sat on a Gandhian fast, a satyagraha, asking for nothing but more democracy and freedom. They were doing no violence. They were not anti-nationals. They were idealists. They proved that truth was on their side. That is why they can never be forgotten, whatever be the nature of the clampdown.

Fourth, the sound of the tanks moving in, and automatic guns, and bullets pumped all over, the dead piled up, and blood scattered all over — while the Deng Xio Peng regime unleashed its brutish death machine. This was a massacre and no organized censorship can deny this.

Fifth, the total clampdown on ‘news’. Nothing happened on June 4, 1989, at Tiananmen Square in Beijing. There were no dead bodies. Nobody was killed. Nobody was arrested and tortured. Nobody disappeared never to be found again!

This censorship or ‘fake news’ just did not succeed. The massacre became banner headlines across the world next day and much after, sparking global outrage and protests, including in India.

Indeed, even as the clampdown blocked all symbolic or collective protests in Hong Kong this June 4, one man apparently walked by on the street with one loud message written on the back of his shirt: “There is nothing to say.”

Another wore a T-shirt with only one word: ‘Conscience’.