Fugitive diamond businessman Nirav Modi on Wednesday lost his appeal against extradition to India with a United Kingdom court dismissing his plea.
The High Court of London (United Kingdom) on Wednesday dismissed the appeal of Nirav Modi, who is wanted in India to face money laundering and fraud cases.
Nirav Modi, who is a prime accused in the Rs 13,500 crore PNB scam, had fled India. He lost his appeal after he had moved High Court in London against extradition on mental health grounds.
The Bench of Justice Stuart Smith and Justice Robert Jay of the High Court said “no features of psychotic illness”.
The court rejected Nirav Modi’s counsel’s claims that he will die by suicide due to severe depression and said “Nirav Modi neither is nor is very likely to be at the most severe end of the scale of depressive illness”.
“He has so far displayed no features of psychotic illness. Although he has exhibited persistent suicidal ideation, he has neither attempted suicide or deliberate self-harm nor disclosed plans to do so, except in the most vague and general way,” the court said.
The High Court also noted the steps taken to render Barrack 12 safe and to ensure that there is effective constant monitoring to reduce both the risk of attempted suicide and the prospect of suicide being committed.
The Court noted that the appellant, Nirav Deepak Modi, is sought by the Government of India.
The High Court noted the sets of criminal proceedings before it. The first, brought by the Central Bureau of Investigation (“the CBI”), relates to a fraud on the Punjab National Bank, which caused losses equivalent to over £700 million. The second, brought by the Enforcement Directorate (“the ED”), relates to the alleged laundering of the proceeds of that fraud.
“While, as we have said, the arrangements cannot entirely eliminate the risk of suicide, that is not the test. The starting point is that a high threshold has to be reached in order to satisfy the court that Mr (Nirav) Modi’s condition is such that it would be oppressive to extradite him. As we have said, the arrangements that will be in place, which have been the subject of assurances in response to the concerns and promptings of those acting for Modi, are appropriate,” noted the court.
“That is in itself an indication that they will enable the authorities to cope properly with Mr (Nirav) Modi’s condition and the risk of suicide. On the assumption that the arrangements are put into place in accordance with the GoI’s assurances, the residual risk is, in our judgment, greatly reduced, said the bench.
Nirav Modi last year had moved High Court against District Judge Sam Goozee’s Westminster Magistrate Court ruling in favor of extradition. He is presently behind the bars at Wandsworth prison in southeast London. (ANI)
The recent debacle of the Indian private sector bank,
Yes Bank, whose board was suspended and superseded by the Reserve Bank of India
(RBI), once again brings into sharp focus the extent and depth to which crony
capitalism continues to prevail in the country’s economy.
Yes Bank was founded in 2004 by Rana Kapoor and his brother-in-law, the late Ashok Kapur. Early this month, the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI), registered a criminal case against Kapoor, who was the CEO of Yes Bank; Dewan Housing Finance Ltd. (DHFL), a non-banking financial services company; and its promoter, Kapil Wadhawan. The CBI charged them with criminal conspiracy, cheating and corruption under the Indian Penal Code and the Prevention of Corruption Act.
The allegations are that between April and June 2018, Yes Bank subscribed or invested Rs 3700 crores in DHFL’s short-term debentures. This financial assistance subsequently turned into non-performing assets as the bank was unable to recover the funds. More seriously, the allegations are that in lieu of the amount extended to DHFL, a company, Do it Urban Ventures, promoted by Kapoor’s three daughters, and received kickbacks in the form of loans amounting to around Rs 600 crores. In other words, the CBI alleges that Kapoor and DHFL entered into a conspiratorial quid pro quo: DHFL got the assistance (that have now turned into bad loans) and he and his family benefited from the kickbacks.
The agency has alleged that Rana Kapoor extended
financial assistance to DHFL to get substantial undue benefit for himself and
his family members via companies held by Kapoor and his family. On March 5,
India’s central bank, the Reserve Bank of India, announced that it had
suspended and superseded the board of Yes Bank. Customers were prevented from
withdrawing more than Rs 50000 from their accounts and rating agencies
downgraded the bank’s core bonds.
Yes Bank’s debacle turns the focus sharply on the
continued prevalence of crony capitalism in India’s economy: an unholy nexus
between banks, financial institutions (FIs), and business enterprises. Banks
and FIs—and not only privately owned ones—in India are known to have cosy
relationships with promoters of large and medium sized Indian companies and
quid pro quo arrangements of the sort that Kapoor and Yes Bank are accused of
are not uncommon. Rather, it is quite the opposite. Examples of misuse of bank
funds are galore in the Indian economy.
One high-profile case is that of liquor baron Vijay Mallya who is currently in the UK while the Indian government is trying to get him extradited so that he can face investigation into charges levelled against him. Mallya is accused of misusing around Rs 9,000 crore (US$1.3 billion), which are loans that his companies, including a now-defunct airline that he started, took from 17 Indian banks. The allegations are that Mallya siphoned off these funds to 40 other companies that he controls around the world.
In another headline-grabbing case in 2018, the CBI
began an investigation into Nirav Modi, a high-profile Indian jeweller, on
allegations that he and his partners defrauded the Punjab National Bank of Rs
28,000 crore, which he is alleged to have siphoned overseas by fraudulently
obtaining letters of undertaking for making payments to overseas suppliers.
Modi is absconding and is believed to be in the US even as the Interpol is
looking for him.
More recently, in December 2019, another high-profile
executive, Jagdish Khattar, the former managing director of Maruti Udyog Ltd.,
India’s largest carmaker, was booked by the CBI for charges against him of
cheating the Punjab National Bank of Rs 110 crore. That case is still being
investigated although Khattar has not been arrested.
These few examples are really the tip of the iceberg.
Nefarious deals between banks and influential entrepreneurs abound in India.
Not long ago, a private sector steel company was embroiled in a similar
controversy when a partly government-controlled financial institution was
believed to be lending it vast sums of money although past loans taken by the
company had turned into non-performing assets.
The curious paradox about such cases is that in many
of the cases, the authorities, including investigative agencies, wake up when
it is already too late. In Yes Bank’s case, the RBI has been issuing warnings
about financial inconsistencies in the bank’s reports. Doubts about Mallya’s
ability to run his airline and manage his finances have been floating around
long before he fled India.
The other, more disheartening, aspect of all this is
the hagiographical treatment that the media have meted out to some of these
controversial promoters and businessmen. Vijay Mallya, now 64, has had
countless laudatory cover stories or “puff pieces” about him. Rana Kapoor, an
aggressive publicity seeker, has found similar success with the Indian media.
Jagdish Khattar was routinely lionised by India’s business press during his
stint as managing director of Maruti between 2002 and 2007.
The truth is that India’s institutions, particularly
in the financial sector, are prone to misuse—either because of the clout of
powerful corporate borrowers or because of complicit bank officials, or both.
India’s government has various laws, organisations and agencies that have been
established to prevent financial fraud. Yet, with regular frequency, shocking
instances of brazen misuse of the financial system come to light. What is needed
is a will to break the cronyism that plagues the nexus between financiers and
their corporate clients. And when frauds come to light, swift dispensation of
justice could work as a deterrent.
In a major development, a London court on Monday issued an arrest warrant against diamond merchant Nirav Modi, who is wanted in India for an alleged loan default case, according to the sources in the Enforcement Directorate.
The arrest warrant was issued by the Westminster Court, the sources added.
India had already requested the extradition of Nirav Modi from the United Kingdom.
The development comes days after the fugitive was tracked down to a 33-storey Centre Point Apartment complex in London’s Theatre District.
The tower was an office complex and was converted into luxury residences with prices ranging from PS2 million to PS55 million all with superb views over the city of London.
Modi is believed to be living in a property worth PS8 million apartments in the tower, the rent for a similar apartment in the tower comes to approximately PS17,000 a month, stated the Daily Telegraph.
On March 9, Ministry of External Affairs spokesperson Raveesh Kumar had said that India is making strong efforts to bring back the fugitive businessman and was waiting for a response from the United Kingdom with regard to its extradition request sent in August last year.
At a media briefing here, Raveesh Kumar said the government is aware of Modi’s presence in the UK and had made the request for his extradition in August last year. He added that the fact the UK was sent that request clears that India is aware of his presence in that country and action has been initiated for his extradition.
Nirav Modi, one of the prime accused in the PNB scam in India. Modi is the subject of an extradition request by India, along with an Interpol Red Corner Notice being issued for the PNB scam accused. Modi is the prime accused in the Rs 13,000 crore PNB fraud, along with his uncle Mehul Choksi.
Choksi was granted citizenship of Antigua and Barbuda on January 15, 2018, while Modi is in London.
Both Modi and Choksi left India in January last year before the PNB scam came out in the public. The duo has not returned to India despite repeated summons from probe agencies and courts. (ANI)
Wanted diamond trader Nirav Modi, one of the prime accused in the PNB scam in India, has been tracked down to an 8-million pound apartment in London’s posh locality West End by The Daily Telegraph.
An interview and a video with the wanted diamantaire published early Saturday in the British newspaper, revealed that Modi has also started a new diamond business in Soho.
The newspaper headlined its piece ‘Exclusive: India’s most wanted man Nirav Modi – accused of £1.5 billion fraud -living openly in London’.
The video shows Nirav Modi sporting a handle-bar moustache and wearing an expensive jacket, repeatedly saying “no comments” to a series of questions put to him by the newspaper’s reporter, including whether he has sought asylum in the United Kingdom.
Modi is the subject of an extradition request by India, along with an Interpol Red Corner Notice being issued for the PNB scam accused. Modi is the prime accused in the Rs 13,000 crore PNB fraud, along with his uncle Mehul Choksi. Choksi was granted citizenship of Antigua and Barbuda on January 15, 2018, while Modi is in London.
Both Modi and Choksi left India in January last year before the PNB scam came out in the public. The duo has not returned to India despite repeated summons from probe agencies and courts.
“Modi appears to have adopted a surprisingly nonchalant attitude to his fugitive status, walking his small dog each day between his apartment and the diamond company’s office in a townhouse in Soho, just a few hundred yards from his Centre Point home,” The Daily Telegraph said.
The newspaper, quoting government sources, also reported that Modi has been given a national insurance number – needed to legally work in the UK – and has been operating bank accounts online while being wanted by India.
“He has also been in contact with a wealth management company based in west London, which specialises in advice to rich foreigners. It is not clear why the British government has given him a national insurance number and yet has apparently failed to act on the Interpol red notice,” The Daily Telegraph said.
When confronted by the newspaper, Modi refused to comment if he has been granted political asylum in the United Kingdom or whether he is still trading in diamonds. “Sorry no comment,” he said, before walking across the road, dressed in an GBP 10,000 black Ostrich hide jacket.
On Friday, the PNB scam accused’s bungalow in Alibag at Raigad district in India was demolished by the authorities on orders of the Bombay High Court for violation of Coastal Regulation Zone (CRZ) norms. (ANI)
Cookie generated by applications based on the PHP language. This is a general purpose identifier used to maintain user session variables. It is normally a random generated number, how it is used can be specific to the site, but a good example is maintaining a logged-in status for a user between pages.
In order to use this website we use the following technically required cookies
These cookies allow the website to remember choices you make (such as your user name, language or the region you are in) and provide enhanced, more personal features. These cookies can also be used to remember changes you have made to text size, fonts and other parts of web pages that you can customize. They may also be used to provide services you have asked for such as watching a video or commenting on a blog. The information these cookies collect may be anonymized and they cannot track your browsing activity on other websites.
Cookie associated with sites using CloudFlare, used to speed up page load times. According to CloudFlare it is used to override any security restrictions based on the IP address the visitor is coming from. It does not contain any user identification information.
Cookie associated with sites using CloudFlare, used to identify trusted web traffic.
These cookies collect information about how visitors use a website, for instance which pages visitors go to most often, and if they get error messages from web pages. These cookies don’t collect information that identifies a visitor. All information these cookies collect is aggregated and therefore anonymous. It is only used to improve how a website works.
This cookie name is associated with Google Universal Analytics - which is a significant update to Google's more commonly used analytics service. This cookie is used to distinguish unique users by assigning a randomly generated number as a client identifier. It is included in each page request in a site and used to calculate visitor, session and campaign data for the sites analytics reports. By default it is set to expire after 2 years, although this is customisable by website owners.
This cookie name is associated with Google Universal Analytics, according to documentation it is used to throttle the request rate - limiting the collection of data on high traffic sites. It expires after 10 minutes.
This cookie is installed by Google Analytics. The cookie is used to store information of how visitors use a website and helps in creating an analytics report of how the website is doing. The data collected including the number visitors, the source where they have come from, and the pages visited in an anonymous form.
These cookies are used by Youtube, Google, Twitter, and Facebook to deliver adverts that are relevant to you and your interests. They are also used to limit the number of times you see an advertisement as well as help measure the effectiveness of the advertising campaign.