Pathaan Song Besharam Rang

Hindutva Gang Hates SRK Because He Represents A Plural India

Vyalok, a Lucknow-based film buff and critic, debunks the controversy over Shahrukh-starrer ‘Pathaan’ and raises other problematic issues related to it

The current controversy over the movie song, Besharam Rang, reminds me of an old interview of Shahrukh Khan. The ‘boycott culture’ was not very prevalent then but it was emerging. The interviewer asked King Khan if was afraid of his films drawing boycott calls over sentiment of a particular segment.

Shahrukh, in his typical disarming smile, responded: “I have a lot of admirers in India. Uncountable. You may call it my arrogance but my admirers would outnumber my haters at any point of time. Second, this boycott thing is a good excuse for anyone who makes a bad film and fails at the box office. I know if my film is not good, it will be a flop.”

This is the straightforwardness and confidence of Shahrukh that makes the Hindutva brigade jealous of him. Just look at his stature. Shahrukh is one of the most widely identified Indian actors worldwide. Shahrukh is the brand ambassador of Dubai. He represents India’s composite culture and tolerance. And that is what riles the Hindutva groups. Clearly, vulgarity and saffron robes were not the real reason behind the protest calls; you can dig out far more vulgarity with similar robes all over the Internet and in popular movies.

His measured response in the face of the Pathaan song controversy – when he talked of positivity –speaks volumes of his maturity as a celebrity. Previously too, he has kept himself calm and composed amid controversies related to his family and films. There are many film actors who have pandered to the political powers that be for commercial gains and support but not Shahrukh.

ALSO READ: ‘Boycott Culture Won’t Work, Nor Will Vulgarity’

Having said that, I would like to add that I did find the Besharam Rang song problematic for reasons other than vulgarity. This pertains to the image of Shahrukh. Allow me to quote from another interview of King Khan with TV anchor Rajdeep Sardesai. In that interview, Khan admitted that he was a slave of his image as projected on the silver screen. This is disconcerting. Do we need to ask Shahrukh why is he still carrying on as an actor with a co-actor half his age? SRK is capable of handling the Hindutva brigade and cancel culture, but he must fight his own demons too.

In the said song, In Besharam Rang song, he appears to be an apology for his past self. Vaibhavi Merchant’s choreography is trying too hard but fails to capitalize on the magic Shahrukh-Deepika couple. Must he resort to this nonsense to remain the ‘King of Romance’?

And it is not only about Shahrukh. All Bollywood actors above 55 years of age need to rethink their roles as they age. Hindi writer Nirmal Verma wrote that “aging is a graceful process”. Even Amitabh Bachchan did not understand this point until his company was doomed and he had to reincarnate himself with a white beard in KBC.

Look at Hollywood. Leave Anthony Hopkins, Al Pacino, Robert De Nero, etc, and even actors like Bruce Willis, Matt Damon and Ben Affleck are choosing roles to suit their age. But here, the Hindi Hero is not ready to come out of his Armani suit and six-pack obsession! And then we raise our eyebrows when just one Hindi film gets listed in the Top-10 list of 2022!

If not Hollywood, our Hindi heroes can look closer home at the South superstar Rajinikanth. When he is not on the screen, he can be seen in a kurta-pajama with a bald head. This is not just his simplicity, it is a statement that Rajini Thalaliva sells dreams on the screen. In real life that façade is off, gracefully.

As told to Abhishek Srivastava

Read more: http://13.232.95.176/

Why I Joined Bharat Jodo Yatra

I Joined Bharat Jodo Yatra For A Plural, Secular India

Based in Thiruvanantapuram, Kerala, Sridhar Radhakrishnan, 54, an eminent environmentalist, engineer and writer, walked with Rahul Gandhi in the Bharat Jodo Yatra. His views

I think we were all waiting for long for somebody with a national stature, or the stature of Rahul Gandhi, to actually stand up and say that we need a pluralistic, secular, democratic society and nation, which is not torn apart by divisive politics and the selling-out of the nation. I was looking for plurality, for deep concern for environment, agriculture and farmers, and against the politics of polarization and divisiveness. I have been talking and writing about it, in my circles, in Kerala and across India.

Bharat Jodo Yatra is a moment in history. This is a political movement. I believe everybody who is deeply concerned about these issues stalking contemporary India should join the Yatra. As I walked with Rahulji, I highlighted three things.

One, as India celebrates the Amrit Mahotsav of 75 years of Indian Independence, is there an Amrit Kaal for the environment as well? Needless to say, the situation in India now is terrible. I spoke to him about the state of Indian environment under various governments since the British times: Nehru, Indira and Rajiv Gandhi, Manmohan Singh, and now. It’s indeed a terrible situation. I also told him that I believe that during Indira Gandhi’s time, it was really a Green Decade!

Sridhar (inset and circled alongside Rahul Gandhi) felt it was his responsibility as an Indian to join Bharat Jodo Yatra

In the legendary Stockholm Conference on Environment held in 1972, only two global leaders were invited, Indira Gandhi and her friend Oloof Palme, the prime minister of Sweden. That speech of Indira Gandhi is perhaps one of the most wonderful speeches I have heard, and its text should be prescribed reading for all concerned citizens. Does the Congress now continue to believe in those principles of sustainability and environmental protection for the future? Rahulji agreed with me, and made a commitment that he would follow these principles in the days to come with sincerity and earnestness.

Second, I discussed with him the agricultural paradigm and the farmers’ struggle. While I appreciated the support of Rahulji and the Congress party to the farmers’ struggle against the farm bills — and that it was very good you stood up and opposed it — I suggested that Rahulji and his party should rethink about the agricultural policies in India. We discussed about agriculture in Europe and China as well. He agreed during most of our discussion.

Third, I reaffirmed and resurrected the concept of the Nyaya Scheme floated by Rahul Gandhi in the last Lok Sabha elections. To my mind, it is an excellent scheme and should be again reasserted as a game-changing project in the next elections in 2024. I stated that this is the next step after NREGA, and this should include the farmers as well. Rahulji insisted that this should exclusively focus on the vast majority of the Below Poverty Line population only. We agreed.

I don’t belong to the Congress party. I joined the movement. This is my responsibility.

As told to Amit Sengupta