Indian Youth Jobs and Disenchantment

Youth, Jobs and Disenchantment in India

Recently, the National Council of Applied Economic Research (NCAER), which is India’s oldest and largest independent non-profit economic research and policy think tank, released a study that found 38% of workers who deliver food for app-based services were at least graduates or above; and 93% had completed 10th standard school education. In Tier 2 cities (with a population of between 50,000 and 99,999), nearly 40% of delivery workers were graduates.

There are an estimated 7 million gig workers who deliver food for app-based services such as Zomato and Swiggy or other goods and packages for services such as Amazon. The NCAER report suggests that a sizeable proportion of food delivery workers are highly educated and could be overqualified for the tasks that they have to perform. 

They could also be underpaid. According to another survey by Borzo, a same-day delivery service, around 78% of gig delivery workers, employed with food and other delivery apps earn less than Rs 2.50 lakh per annum or around Rs 20,000 per month. Many, if not most, of these workers are the sole earners for their families, which often include elderly dependents as well as minors and unemployed kin, so the wages they make can be piffling.

Moreover, gig workers such as those covered by these reports work much longer hours than others. The NCAER report found that the average weekly working hours for platform workers amounted to 69.3 hours, in contrast to the 56 hours reported for workers included in the Periodic Labour Force Survey (PLFS), which computes the government’s estimates of employment and unemployment. So, a gig worker typically works nearly 10 hours seven days a week to earn a meagre wage.

In addition, gig workers in India are not covered under labour laws, leaving them without legal protection against discrimination, unfair termination, or workplace harassment. Additionally, they are deprived of crucial benefits such as health insurance, retirement benefits, and paid leave. Instead they often face penalties if they slip up on tight delivery time targets. 

To be sure, some gig workers take those jobs to complement the income they might earn from other jobs that they hold but presumably for a large proportion of such workers, the gigs are their primary jobs.

Let’s shift the focus a bit now to jobs in general in India. First, a quick statistical recap on India’s youth population. Of 1.4 billion Indians, 50% (700 million) are below the age of 25; and more than 65% (>900 million) are below the age of 35. While those are huge numbers, the average age of an Indian is 29 (in China it is 37; and in Japan 48). The estimated number of young Indians (in the 15-24 age group) is 254 million; and the population of working age Indians (15-64) is estimated at more than 950 million.

It is also estimated that only around half of that working age population is employed and that too most of them in agriculture where, on overcrowded tiny farms, employment can be an euphemism for joblessness. People are forced to stay on although they add little or nothing to a farm’s productivity simply because there is no alternative option to earn an income. 

So, it is no surprise that when vacancies, such as for government jobs, are announced, the rush to apply for them is unprecedented. 

ALSO READ: Can Compulsory Military Service Solve India’s Job Crisis?

Consider a couple of examples, none of them is apocryphal: This year for 60,000 police constable jobs in the populous state of Uttar Pradesh, there were 4.8 million applications. When the Indian army recruits soldiers, the selection ratio is as low as 3%. 

Government data on youth unemployment is patchy, discontinuous, and ambiguous but it is clear that youth unemployment is a serious issue simmering under the surface in India. Of the estimated 500 million or so Indians who are deemed to be employed, only a quarter or around 130 million, are in the organised sector (government or private sector jobs). The rest work in unorganised sector jobs where benefits, including wages, can be low, uncertain, and unregulated.

The numbers are equally staggering when it comes to people seeking admission to professional institutes. In 2023, more than 2 million people took the National Eligibility cum Entrance Test (NEET), a standardised national-level entrance exam in India for students who wish to pursue undergraduate medical education in government or private medical colleges. The number of seats they were competing for was 108,000. The selection ratio was a shade above 5%. In 2023, 1.5 million people took the joint entrance exam to get into engineering colleges. They were competing for 250,000 seats.

The intensity of the pressure and competition to get into institutions is high and it is borne out by incidents such as the NEET. This year, there were allegations of a paper leak, backed by a mafia of operators who sold exam papers before the test and jeopardised the futures of thousands of candidates.

Examples such as the state of gig workers or the lack of organised sector jobs for India’s youth, or the exam paper leak scandal are just a few indicators of how disenchanted India’s youth might be. 

Despite being one of the fastest-growing economies, India faces significant unemployment issues, especially among the educated youth. There is often a gap between the skills that graduates possess and what employers need, leading to underemployment or joblessness.

The fragility of such a job market can be exacerbated by periodic economic slowdowns and global uncertainties. And, finally, the sheer number of job seekers compared to available opportunities creates intense competition, making it difficult for many to secure stable employment.

The government often cites figures that show a rise in the number of start-ups and the growth of the gig economy as evidence that there are more opportunities for India’s youth. But for the cohort of more than 250 million young Indians are such options the outcome of genuine entrepreneurship and innovation or signs of frustration and desperation? You decide.

For more details visit us: https://lokmarg.com/

Modi 3.0 Must Move Beyond Temple and Statues

‘Modi 3.0 Must Move Beyond Temple, Statues and Vistas’

Kashish, an aspiring journalist, says Ram Temple or new grand structures will not generate employment for the teeming jobless millions. Her views:

No matter how much our current government is speaking about its glorious work – that it has increased the respect and dignity of India abroad – only ‘us’ know the real condition of our country. In this ‘us’, I am including the people who are hustling for a good job, a good income and a good life. This includes the vast majority of the poor. Yes, I am talking about the youth who are unemployed, even after acquiring the best of educational qualification.

In a recent study, it is revealed that many highly qualified people are filling forms for government jobs like peons, helpers, cleaners, and other low-level posts. This tells us the state of mass unemployment in contemporary India.

Rising joblessness and inflation are the reasons behind this terrible state of affairs. And the main point of concern is that the Indian government is refusing to do anything!

People in India are stuck between the private and government sectors. In the private sector, there are long working hours, less payouts terrible working conditions, and no job-security. Government jobs are like lucky draw coupons – there are too many aspirants and very few jobs!

ALSO READ: ‘Govt Focus is on Bullet Trains, Not Passenger Safety’

Hence, there is huge competition in the face of low vacancies. Youngsters like me are afraid and depressed due to this rise and rise of unemployment stalking the nation.

Inflation is on the rise making the survival of the middle class and poor difficult. The saddest part is that our government never wants to talk about unemployment, inflation and other crucial issues; its favourite subject seems to be solely religion, and nothing else.

Tell me, where are the ‘acche din’ as promised by the prime minister of India?

Kashish yearns for an equitable society shorn of differences and discord

Take the NEET paper leak case. The exam involved the emotions and mental health of thousands of students. The sleepless nights and early mornings, bereft of all joys of ordinary life and youth, merely to prepare for an exam on which their future depended. Most of these students come from humble backgrounds; some of them from below the poverty line. For them, it becomes well-nigh impossible to prepare again and again for the same exam, because they have to look for work to sustain their families.

One of my friends secured 670 marks in the exam. He is now in serious depression, because he will not get admission into a ‘dream college’. Who will help him now? When doctors or other professionals make a serious mistake, they are fired! Why should the officers of NTA be not held accountable?

As a journalism student, I can only hope for an honest investigation. The multi-million Ram temple at Ayodha, massive statues and cricket stadiums costing millions, don’t mean anything to us, or, the poor. As young citizens, we do not aspire for these things. We yearn for a peaceful, harmonious and developed society, with no income gap between the rich and poor; a society which supports the poorest of the poor.

Tragically, this seems much too difficult in the Modi era!

The PM’s sole purpose in life seems to promote Hindutva – is he not the prime minister of a secular and pluralist country? Is religion not a private affair? Is it not his duty to treat every religion equally?

He is only promoting temples, statues, stadiums and a new Parliament. How does this help the young? We need a development model which serves the poor and ordinary folks. Tell me, will the Ram Mandir provide jobs and security to the millions? The answer is: No!

(The narrator is studying print, digital and television media at the Jagran Institute of Management and Mass Communication (JIMMC), Noida)

Meta Job Cuts

Meta To Announce Fresh Round Of Job Cuts In Facebook, Instagram

Facebook parent company Meta is all set to commence the companywide new job cuts on Wednesday as part of reorganising teams and management hierarchies, The Washington Post reported.

According to the internal memo that a US-based newspaper read, Meta’s head of human resources, Lori Goler, wrote Tuesday evening that the company will begin notifying employees regarding the downsizing of technical teams.

Meta is also poised to announce newly reorganized teams and management hierarchies as the social media giant seeks to become leaner and more efficient.

This new layoff will affect the teams working on Facebook, WhatsApp, Messenger, Instagram and the virtual-reality division Reality Labs among others, according to Goler.

According to the memo, Goler advised some employees not to go into the office if it wasn’t critical for their role. Senior leaders made layoff decisions as part of the wider restructuring effort, Goler added.

“This will be a difficult time as we say goodbye to friends and colleagues who have contributed so much to Meta,” she wrote. “It will take time for everyone — both those leaving and those staying — to process tomorrow’s news, and I know teams will show up for each other with compassion, support and care,” she added.

The company is expected to lay off what probably will be thousands of highly skilled employees — such as engineers and other technical staffers — who help build the company’s products, according to people familiar with the matter.

Earlier, in March, Meta said that they will remove 10,000 employees from their team.

“we expect to reduce our team size by around 10,000 people and to close around 5,000 additional open roles that we haven’t yet hired,” Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg said in a statement published on Meta.

He further stated, “This will be tough and there’s no way around that. It will mean saying goodbye to talented and passionate colleagues who have been part of our success. They’ve dedicated themselves to our mission and I’m personally grateful for all their efforts.”

“We will support people in the same ways we have before and treat everyone with the gratitude they deserve,” he added. (ANI)

Read More: http://13.232.95.176/

Mamata on country division

Stay In Five Star, Instigate Riots, Go: Mamata Attacks BJP

West Bengal Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee on Monday attacked the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP)-led Centre alleging central forces came to the state to instigate riots.

Mamata Banerjee was on visit to Purba Medinipur on Monday where she distributed public welfare services to the people.
Addressing the gathering here, Banerjee said, “Here the Central Forces came, stayed in a five star hotel, instigated riots. They then held a meeting with BJP people and returned. Before their arrival, first of all ask should them that where is the money for 100 days employment (MGNREGA)? First tell that, then come to Bengal to incite riots.”

Banerjee urged the people to not vote for BJP in the upcoming Panchayat polls and 2024 Lok Sabha elections.

“I will do everything for you (people), but you are requested not to support BJP, the party that create riots, in Panchayat elections and 2024 elections,” she added.

Notably, ruckus and stone pelting erupted during the BJP’s Shobha yatra in Hooghly on Sunday. Earlier on Thursday, several vehicles were set on fire after two groups clashed in Howrah amid Ram Navami celebrations.

During the procession, the rioters vandalized public and private properties and set vehicles on fire.

Meanwhile, allegations and counter-allegations continued to fly between the ruling Trinamool Congress and the principal opposition party BJP on the issue.

Soon after the reports of the violence Union Home Minister Amit Shah had spoken to the Bengal Governor CV Ananda Bose on the issue. In fact, the union home secretary has sought a detailed report from the state on the violence.

West Bengal BJP demanded National Investigation Agency (NIA) probe into the violence. (ANI)

Read More: http://13.232.95.176/

Weekly Update: Corporate-Civil Service Divide; Captain Deserts, Cong At Sea

Grit and determination are what helped Shubham Kumar, this year’s topper in the Union Public Service Commission (UPSC) examination, realise his ambitions. It was his third attempt this year. Last year, when Kumar took the exam, he was selected but his rank was 268. Kumar wanted to realise his ambition to do much better. So he took the exam again. This time, he topped.

Kumar, 24, comes from Kumhari village in the Kadwa block of Katihar district in Bihar. It is in a zone that is chronically ravaged by floods. The son of a rural bank’s branch manager, Kumar, a graduate of IIT-Mumbai, has always been determined about pursuing success single-mindedly. And, from a very young age, he wanted to become an IAS officer, a dream that has now come true.

The examinations conducted by the UPSC are for aspiring candidates who want to join the elite bureaucratic cadres in India–including the Indian Administrative Service (IAS), the Indian Foreign Service (IFS) and the Indian Police Service (IPS), among others. Every year, as many as a million candidates register for the examination and of them,about half actually complete the exams. But the number of positions that they compete for is less than 1,000. So the percentage of candidates selected from all of those who take the tests is 0.2%. There are very few competitive exams in the world that are as difficult to crack as the UPSC examination.

Kumar is emblematic of the drive that UPSC toppers demonstrate. Last year’s topper, Pradeep Singh, son of a village sarpanch from Tewari village in Haryana’s Sonipat district, made it to the top rank in his second attempt. Kumar and Singh are also examples of how, increasingly, aiming high in the UPSC exams has become more an objective of, often less privileged, rural Indian youth rather than their more well-heeled urban counterparts.

Although accurate statistics are not easy to come by, it is estimated that the majority of the candidates that get selected for UPSC’s elite cadres each year come from the two states of Uttar Pradesh and Bihar. Of course, these two states are among India’s most populous ones–UP has over 200 million people, of which 77% live in villages; and Bihar has a population of 104 million, of which 88% live in villages. In UP, there is a tiny village named Madhopatti in the Sirkoni block of Jaunpur district, where just 75 households live and, it is believed, that each of these households has at least one member of the family in one of the elite UPSC services. It is even known as the Officer’s Village of India.

Why do rural youths seem to aspire more to join the UPSC cadres more than urban youths do? Is it because the cachet attached to those services appears to be valued more highly in India’s villages and small towns than in its cities? Is it a truism that India’s urban youths eye careers in the corporate world, and aspire more for an MBA tag than that of an IAS, IFS, or IAS? Questions such as those require sociological probes.

Is there a divide between India’s youth? Are India’s urban youngsters more westernised, corporatised and lured by wealth and material acquisitions? An MBA from even a low-tier business school could expect a starting salary of Rs 1lakh plus a month, which is roughly double of what a freshly-minted IAS officer makes. But a job in the corporate sector has none of the responsibility, commitment and dedication to nation building or administration that comes with the job of being a civil servant. Half of India’s 1.36 billion people are below the age of 25. With such a huge proportion of youth among its population, questions such as the ones just posited require to be addressed.

Captain Ejects

One month is a long time in politics. The latest example of this truism is the Punjab unit of the Grand Old Party. At the beginning of September, it seemed Captain Amarinder Singh was firmly in the saddle, despite a bitter faceoff with newly-appointed Pradesh Congress head Navjot Singh Sidhu. The party seemed to be in pole position for the next Assembly election due early next year. Captain had made the right noises amid raging protests against central farm laws and this was not lost on the state electorate. The second week of September saw Sidhu garnering support of state legislators who were miffed with the Chief Minister, and there were quite a few of them.

Interestingly, Captain had more support from Congress leaders active in Delhi than in Punjab. However, Gandhis seemed tilted in favour of Navjot Sidhu who paraded about three dozen MLAs to buttress his claims in public view. Before the end of third week, Amarinder Singh put in a one-line resignation to the state governor. The wounded tiger minced no words in raising questions on Sidhu leadership. The acrimony did its damage to the Congress party.

The Congress went into a huddle to pick up the next chief minister, months ahead of elections. When they picked up Charanjit Singh Channi, a Dalit Sikh, for a state which has about 30% Dalit voters, some viewed it as a masterstroke to resurrect the turbulent jet. Barely had it gained balance, just a week after the Captain had deserted the ship, when the mercurial Sidhu rocked the boat once again. Citing some ‘unexplained’ principles, Sidhu quit as the PCC chief, making himself as the shortest PCC chief in the party’s recent history. Captain was grinning from ear to ear, with a told-you-so look on his face. His exit from the party, with a vow to defeat Sidhu in next election, brought the unwashed linen in public.

Central leaders like Manish Tiwari and Kapil Sibal, dubbed as members of G-23 band of party ‘rebels’, found an apt opportunity to question the party leadership in handling the matter. From the numero uno status in the beginning of month, the state Congress unit had egg on its face just before the flip of the calendar leaf. The electorate must also be thinking: if a party cannot manage its domestic affairs, how will it rule a border state effectively?