‘Manthan’ And The Churning It Triggered

The repair, resurrection and re-release of the film Manthan last month matched India’s political churning as toxic, divisive, yet aspirational elections neared the end.

The 1976 classic was part of India’s big splash at the 77th Cannes Film Festival. It was important as it came from France, the birthplace of cinema. It also recognised the few quality films out of over 2,400 films made last year. They helped the waving of the flag. But they also sent multiple messages that need to be noted.

Cannes was unique because its entries won in different categories. The one in the competition section entered after a 30-year gap, received applause for eight long minutes. Their appearances are not to be belittled, India is no longer confined to Aishwarya Rai Bachchan, Priyanka Chopra and others walking the red carpet.

Take the films first before reading the messages. In each of the three competitive sections, India won a major award. Grand Prix, the second-most award went to Payal Kapadia-directed All We Imagine As Light. It is an ode to Mumbai, the birthplace of Indian Cinema and despite its many flaws – Urbs Prima in Indis – India’s premier city. The three women protagonists who are there to make a living amidst chaos are portrayed by less-known actors – none from ‘Bollywood’.

This is ‘independent’ cinema and bears some comparison with the ‘parallel’ or New Wave cinema of the 1970s and 1980s. Manthan was one of the outstanding products of that era. Hopefully, the new string of successes may see some of the big money invested in commercial cinema getting diverted to such efforts.

Kapadia’s film bagged the second-most prestigious prize of the festival after the Palme d’Or, which went to American director Sean Baker for Anora. An AFP report says Baker and his films were “hot favourites” but the victory was “surprising as many expected either the gentle Indian drama or the Iranian film The Seed of the Sacred Fig to win.”

Cannes, it seemed, celebrated India last month and the Indians did not belie the expectations. Kapadia’s win shows poor public memory and poorer attention to documentary cinema. In 2021, her acclaimed documentary A Night of Knowing Nothing premiered at Director’s Fortnight and won the Oeil d’Or (Golden Eye) award.

She is an alumna of the Government of India-run Film and Television Institute of India (FTII). Called “anti-national” and punished for leading the protest against its then leadership, she took less than nine years to prove her mettle. Two more graduates have brought FTII glory. Chidananda S. Naik’s Sunflowers Were the First Ones to Know… won the La Cinef first prize. And Santosh Sivan was bestowed the lifetime Pierre Angenieux Excellence in Cinematography award. Need one say anything more about FTII?

Many foreign awards have marked India’s century-plus cinematic journey. But few remember that they won global applause even before Independence. The first to be shown at an international film festival was Seeta a Bengali film directed by Debaki Bose. It won an honorary diploma at the 2nd Venice International Film Festival in 1934. Sadly, Bose’s feat, like many by Satyajit Ray, Mrinal Sen, Gautam Ghosh and others from Bengal, accused of “selling India’s poverty to the West”, goes unnoticed by what is arguably called the “Indian film industry”.

In 1946 came Chetan Anand-directed Neecha Nagar. At the first Cannes Film Festival, it shared the Grand Prix with eleven of the 18 entered feature films. It remains the only Indian film to be awarded a Palme d’Or.

Entries at Cannes last month showed international mingling of talent. The Best Actress Award, the first by an Indian at Cannes, went to Kolkata-born Anasuya Sengupta. She worked with Bulgarian filmmaker Konstantin Boijanov for a Hindi film, The Shameless. It is inspired by William Dalrymple’s Nine Lives. Neither Boijanov nor Dalrymple, a celebrity chronicler of South Asian history, is stranger to India and the world.

Manthan has been restored by the Film Heritage Foundation. One recalls the buzz Manthan caused when shown at the International Film Festival of India (IFFI) in 1977. It was a poignant moment for Naseeruddin Shah, who had debuted as an actor when he led the team at Cannes.

Among the few ‘survivors’ spared by the ravages of time are director Shyam Benegal, now 89, and cinematographer Govind Nihalani, 83. Tracing the “crazy journey” 48 years ago, Benegal says: “Now I can sit back as an old man and say, we did that.” The film achieved an impact that most entertainment films don’t. It’s by far my most influential work, he says.

ALSO READ: Verghese Kurien – Showing The Milky Way

Come to think of it, Manthan was a propaganda film meant to promote milk cooperatives after their success in Gujarat. It is a far cry from the present-day films that engage in political propaganda, try to re-write or sidestep history and spread hatred.

Herein lies the larger message of India’s own ‘Manthan’ – the churning – as a nation that stresses synergy, not separateness.

It is about two ‘revolutions’ – ‘white’ of the milk, pioneered by Verghese Kurien and ‘green’ in the farm sector by MS Swaminathan. Benegal says: “To me, he (Kurien) was one of the two greatest men who helped develop the country in the first 50 years of independent India. The other was Swaminathan.”

Swaminathan’s daughter Sowmya, a renowned scientist, stresses: “My father taught me the importance of humility. He said the Green Revolution only came because of the synergy between the scientists, politicians and farmers, describing it as a symphony orchestra.”

Manthan was Kurien’s brainchild and he involved 500,000 farmers. With Rupees each contributed, it was India’s first crowdfunded film. Every actor gave his/her best. Particularly, Smita Patil, the spunky farm woman, who came to the cinema and left like a meteor.

Heading the bunch of young actors was Girish Karnad, who played a veterinary doctor wedded to the ideal of cooperation among farmers. Many thought he portrayed Kurien, an engineer who strayed into harnessing milk production and distribution in a milk-starved country.

The ‘green’ one has pulled India out of the shame of food shortages and dependence on free foreign food, like the one the United States sent under its law, “PL-480”. Today, India tops in many farm products, exporting them, and even having the means to import when needed.

India is the world’s highest milk producer, contributing 24.64% of global milk production in 2021-22. At over 220 million tonnes, it is a six-fold growth since the 1960s. The dairy and animal husbandry sector contributes five per cent to the country’s GDP.

The present generation needs reminding that it did not happen overnight.

Sadly, farming and dairying cooperatives, launched in the last century, have been taken over by politicians with little faith in the concept. Values and priorities have changed. The private sector and multinational corporations have stepped in.

Lastly, when Swaminathan was awarded Bharat Ratna, the country’s highest civilian award, nobody thought of bestowing the same on Kurien.

The writer can be reached at mahendraved07@gmail.com

Rana Daggubati

Rana Daggubati Announces His Talk Show ‘The Rana Connection’

Actor Rana Daggubati is all set to come up with an exciting and curiosity-piquing talk show featuring his friends and contemporaries from Indian cinema.

The announcement was disclosed at a Prime Video event in Mumbai on Tuesday in the presence of the show’s team.

The show is titled ‘The Rana Connection.’

Taking to Instagram, Prime Video shared the news with fans and captioned the post, “An exciting and curiosity-piquing talk show hosted by celebrated actor Rana Daggubati, featuring his friends and contemporaries from Indian cinema. #TheRanaConnectionOnPrime #AreYouReady #PrimeVideoPresents.”

Rajeev Ranjan and Prashanth Potluri serve as producers on ‘The Rana Connection’.

Rana Daggubati is a renowned name in the Telugu cinema industry. Daggubati is one of the most versatile artists, having worn numerous hats and performed all roles admirably over the years. He is not only known as an actor, but also as a producer and entrepreneur.

He got international recognition with his role of Bhallaladeva in ‘Baahubali: The Beginning’ (2015) and ‘Baahubali 2: The Conclusion’ (2017).

Meanwhile, Rana will be seen in Vettaiyan, directed by TJ Gnanavelraja.

Speaking of ‘Vettaiyan’, the film also features legendary actor Amitabh Bachchan, with Fahadh Faasil, Dushara Vijayan, and Ritika Singh. The film will be released in the latter part of 2024

Anirudh Ravichander, who worked with Rajinikanth in Jailer, with Vijay in Leo, and most recently with Shah Rukh Khan in Jawan, has also joined the team as the film’s music director. (ANI)

For more details visit us: https://lokmarg.com/

Zanai In Indian Cinema

Asha Announces Debut Of Her Granddaughter Zanai In Indian Cinema

Legendary singer Asha Bhosle’s granddaughter Zanai Bhosle is all set to make her cinematic debut.

The young girl will be seen essaying the role of Chhatrapati Shivaji Maharaj’s wife Rani Sai Bhonsale in filmmaker Sandeep Ssingh, ‘The Pride of Bharat – Chhatrapati Shivaji Maharaj’.

Announcing the debut of Zanai, Asha Bhosle took to X and wrote, “I am truly overjoyed to see my lovely granddaughter @ZanaiBhosle joining the cinema world in the upcoming grand epic #ThePrideofBharat Chatrapati Shivaji Maharaj. I sincerely hope that she claims her destined position in cinematic history and wish her and @thisissandeeps all the very best.”

Sandeep Ssingh also expressed his happiness in having Zanai in his film.

He said, “l feel so honoured and absolutely privileged to be launching Zanai who is a descendant of Chhatrapati Shivaji Maharaj’s family lineage and also shares her lineage with extremely brilliant and accomplished family, with the late Lata Mangeshkarji being her aunt and being Asha Bhosaleji’s granddaughter. She is a proud Bhosle, who has already been gifted with a soulful voice and has an ear for music. But few know what a talented dancer and a skillful performer she is. She will do full justice to the character of Rani Sai Bai.”

He added, “As Shivaji Maharaj’s wife, Rani Sai Bai had contributed immensely to his growth as a king and a human being.”

The Pride of Bharat – Chhatrapati Shivaji Maharaj is being made on a massive scale and will be released on February 19, 2026, which is Chhatrapati Shivaji Maharaj Jayanti.

The film marks Sandeep Singh’s theatrical directorial debut and is presented by Immerso Studio and Legend Studios. (ANI)

For more details visit us: https://lokmarg.com/

Cinema Audience Is Evolving

‘Cinema Audience Is Evolving Thanks To OTT; Content Must Follow The Curve’

Niraj Kumar Mishra, an independent filmmaker and writer, shares his views about Indian cinema, its dynamics – the good, bad and the ugly.

The digital revolution has changed the dynamics of storytelling. Videos are everywhere, from YouTube to Instagram to Facebook. Reels and podcasts have taken over the world. And definitely, the race for audio-visual storytelling has entered a new phase of revolution. In the midst of all this chaos, big players have upped the game and opened up a bigger market with direct-to-digital content. Old formats like theatrical films and satellite television are now struggling. And this worldwide phenomenon has entered India like never before.

The bigger the demand, the bigger the supply, and the bigger the opportunity. And it definitely has opened the doors for new talent. We must feel blessed that those closed doors are gradually opening up. But the bigger question is: are we compromising with content since both the demand and the supply is high?

Television to OTT transition. The transition occurred with the expectation of top quality delivery. People who are masters at delivering quantity mostly fail to deliver quality. This is exactly what happened when OTT madness began. Loads of people with a TV mindset migrated to OTT; unfortunately, out of those, only a limited number are capable of thinking quality. Most of them don’t even understand the basic nature of a story; mostly, they fail to identify whether it’s a web series, a limited series, a film, or a TV show. Result: out of 100 shows, we hardly notice a couple of good or watchable content. Amid the substantial number of shows or films, only a couple of works click with the audience. We definitely need to get out of our comfort zones to address the elephant in the room.

Talent vs Agencies. These days, loads of talent agencies are mushrooming in the industry across the country. These management pass-outs haven’t done anything creative in their limited career graph, but they do the filtering process for actors. Result: continuous disasters at the box office. It’s like a car mechanic being assigned to treat a human heart. Very few are sensible enough to understand the content. And because of that, loads of good stories never reach the actors.

ALSO READ: ‘A New Movement Is Shaping Up On OTT Platform’

In fact, the quality of the stories doesn’t matter; they only focus on people with top-notch credentials, and the studio backs them up so that they get their commission without any hassle in less time. For them, neither talent nor actors matter; only remuneration and their cuts. In such a scenario, disasters are inevitable, careers are ruined, and so is the business of the industry.

Nepotism and lobbying. In the ocean of opportunities, creamy jobs are getting re-routed either to princes and princesses or well-connected lobbyists and courtiers. Talent is not a priority. This does not mean that nepotism doesn’t give us good talents. Ranbir Kapoor and Alia Bhatt are brilliant actors; there are brilliant directors and writers too. But unfortunately, that also has a lower percentage compared to the rest.

Established directors and producers give opportunity to their ‘yes ministers’. We need to have democracy when we filter talent. In the business of art, business shouldn’t be the first priority. I’m reiterating, any compromise with the art is bad for business.

Writing and business. Nobody sees things beyond Friday. This year, three mega hits hit the market: blockbuster movies, and Bollywood is back into business. But, we can’t deny the fact that all three films were badly written. Two rode on the business skills and stardom of SRK, and another one on the recollection of larger-than-life character Tara Singh and the inorganic, on-screen nationalism. With the same budget and same story flow, we could’ve written better screenplays!

One of the studio heads once told me, “You get a face for your film; we won’t even ask for the script”. It was a shocking revelation. We forget that good writing is the foundation of any form of storytelling.

Voice Vs. Entertainment Business. Evolution is the key for the longevity of any business, and in the entertainment business, we need to give priority to unique voices, out-of-the-box and never-heard-before stories. Unfortunately, in India, we haven’t gone beyond Salim-Javed; there is no innovation, only project set-up and formula films customized for Box Office.

The audience is now exposed to world content; their choices are evolving. With an ever-evolving audience, we must bring diversity on board. We need more original stories with seamless telling.

The real responsibility lies on us—the talent, the actors, the directors, and the producers. We have to relentlessly peruse the changing dynamics of world cinema, constantly learn and pick unique styles of storytelling, and give opportunity to unique voices. Put honesty and excellence in originals; that’s all we need, and yes, I also pledge to bring that revolution!

(The narrator has produced and directed Samanantar, a feature film which won the ‘Best Feature Film – Maithili’ at the 69th National Awards 2023)

As told to Deepa Gupta

For more details visit us: https://lokmarg.com/

Waheeda Dadasaheb Award

Waheeda To Be Conferred Dadasaheb Phalke Lifetime Achievement Award

Union Information and Broadcasting Minister Anurag Singh Thakur on Tuesday announced that veteran actor Waheeda Rehman will be conferred the prestigious Dadasaheb Phalke Lifetime Achievement Award for her stellar contribution to Indian cinema.

Taking to X (formerly known as Twitter), Thakur penned down a long note and made the announcement.

“I feel an immense sense of happiness and honour in announcing that Waheeda Rehman ji is being bestowed with the prestigious Dadasaheb Phalke Lifetime Achievement Award this year for her stellar contribution to Indian Cinema,” he said. 

“Waheeda ji has been critically acclaimed for her roles in Hindi films, prominent among them, Pyaasa, Kaagaz ke Phool, Chaudhavi Ka Chand, Saheb Biwi Aur Ghulam, Guide, Khamoshi and several others. In her career spanning over 5 decades, she has essayed her roles with extreme finesse, leading to a National Film Award for her role as a clanswoman in the film Reshma and Shera. A Padma Shri and Padma Bhushan awardee, Waheeda ji has exemplified dedication, commitment and the strength of a Bharatiya Nari who can achieve the highest level of professional excellence with her hardwork,” he added.

Thakur referred to Parliament passing the Women’s Reservation Bill and said Waheed Rehman getting a Dadasaheb Phalke Lifetime Achievement award is a fitting tribute to one of the leading ladies of Indian Cinema.

“At a time when the historic Nari Shakti Vandan Adhiniyam has been passed by Parliament, her being awarded with this lifetime achievement award is a fitting tribute to one of the leading ladies of Indian Cinema and one who has dedicated her life after films to philanthropy and the greater good of society.”

Thakur congratulated the veteran star and concluded, “I congratulate her and humbly pay my regards to her rich body of work that is an intrinsic part of our film history,” Thakur said. 

Waheeda Rehman is known for her outstanding performances in films like ‘Guide’, ‘Pyaasa’, ‘Kaagaz Ke Phool’, ‘Chaudhvin Ka Chand’, and ‘Sahib Bibi Aur Ghulam’. (ANI)

Read More: https://lokmarg.com/

Calling a Movie Islamophobic is The Easy Part

‘Branding a Movie Islamophobic or Propaganda is The Easy Part’

Gaurav Pandey, a social activist from Lucknow, says one may critique the handling of a cinematic work by a certain director, but one cannot shut one’s eyes to the reality. His views:

After the stunning success of The Kashmir Files, a movie based on the plight and forced displacement of Kashmir Pandits, many filmmakers felt there was a need to revisit similar injustices in the country. The movie thus sparked off several movies, like The Kerala Story, Ajmer 92 and 72 Hoorain, which the liberals were quick to brand as Islamophobic. However, I feel these movies hold the mirror to our society. Calling them Islamophobic is the easy part.

Cinema is but reflection of our society. If it fails to fulfil that objective, it becomes meaningless. Can one deny that Kashmiri Pandits were brutally killed and forced to leave their homes? Or scores of girls were blackmailed in Ajmer? Or innocent, impressionable minds are brainwashed to take up arms in the name of jihad? These are harsh realities. You may disagree with or critique the handling of these issues by a certain director, but you cannot shut your eyes to what has happened or is happening around you in the country.

These films do not target a person or a community, they expose the blot on our society and culture. This difference needs to be understood. After all these film did pass muster with the Censor Board, which screens every film before release! If at all these films had misrepresented facts or a faith, or were seen as promoting communal disharmony, the board would have objected to such scenes or the entire film.

Also, the filmmakers, for the past decade or so, have also been taking the liberty to choose topics that portrays what has been under-represented in popular culture. That is why a wide range of ‘bold’ films are being made and released on silver screen or OTT format. These themes speak of Dalit repression, women empowerment, alternate sexuality… and what not. So why object only to movies that unravel the misdeeds of a few criminals who took shelter behind religion?

ALSO READ: ‘Propaganda Movies Distort Facts Selectively’

Today’s ‘realistic’ films remind one of early Bollywood era, when cinema portrayed harsh realities, not stars who would be singing and dancing in foreign locales. Now, the filmmakers have become more ‘liberal’ in exploring all the avenues more freely.

Take for example Ajmer 92, which revisits a horrific real incident that deeply impacted the city of Ajmer in 1992. It portrays how more than 200 college girls were systematically blackmailed and raped by influential individuals connected to a political party. It tactfully avoids the perpetrators’ ties to the Sufi Dargah. It also embraced the cause of women empowerment, igniting a powerful message in its own unique way.

Similarly 72 Hoorain delves deep into the concept of terrorism with the intent to address the root cause of the problem and exposing the driving force behind it. It also beautifully portrays the `brain washing’ tactics used to lead the youths up the garden path.

Despite the controversies, such films are important in revitalizing Indian cinema and restore its former glory and can be useful in preserving our regional identity. The films which blindly follow a formulaic approach that dilute the distinct regional flavours and the distinctive depth of our society are no longer carry an appeal. No doubt commercial success is the most important aspect of filmmaking, but it should also not overshadow the need for innovative storytelling and thought provoking narratives. These films push the envelope, explore unconventional themes and dare to challenge society norms.

As told to Rajat Rai

Read More: http://13.232.95.176/

SC: Cinema Owners Can Prohibit Outside Food In Halls

SC: Cinema Owners Can Prohibit Outside Food In Halls

The Supreme Court on Tuesday observed that cinema hall owners are fully entitled to set their terms and conditions for selling food and beverages inside the halls.

“Suppose someone starts getting jalebis. The owner would not want anyone wiping their hands on the seats,” a bench of Chief Justice of India DY Chandrachud and Justice PS Narasimha said.
The apex court further remarked that the “owners may not want the tandoori chicken to be bought in” but elaborated that no one was forcing cinemagoers to buy popcorn.

It said a moviegoer has a choice not to consume the food and beverages served inside theatres.

A cinema hall is the private property of the owner of such hall and he is entitled to put such terms and conditions as he deems fit provided the same are not contrary to public interest or safety, it further observed.

CJI Chandrachud said, “A cinema hall owner has the right to regulate the entry of food and beverage. Whether to consume what is available is entirely the choice of the moviegoer. Viewers visit halls for entertainment.”

The apex court said that the viewer has to adhere to the rules of the cinema hall owner and it is evidently a matter of a commercial decision of the theatre owner.

“The cinema hall is not a gym where you need healthy food. It is a place of entertainment. It is privately owned, so it is the owner’s prerogative,” the apex court noted.

The top court set aside the order of the Jammu and Kashmir High Court which had ordered multiplexes and movie theatres not to prevent cinemagoers from carrying their own food and beverages into movie halls.

The apex court was hearing a batch of appeals filed by theatre owners and the Multiplex Association of India challenging a 2018 verdict of the High Court. (ANI)

Read More: http://13.232.95.176

Arjun about delhi

Delhi Has Been A Lucky Charm, Says Arjun

Actor Arjun Kapoor, who has commenced shooting for his untitled film’s Delhi schedule, recently revealed how the national capital has always been tremendously lucky for his film career.

As per reports, Arjun Kapoor, Rakul Preet Singh, and Bhumi Pednekar are coming together for a romantic comedy film directed by Mudassar Aziz for which the trio has completed the London schedule.
Although an official announcement from the makers of the film is still awaited.

Arjun said, “Delhi has always been special to me and it has been a hugely lucky charm for me. I shot 2 States, Ki & Ka, Sandeep Aur Pinky Faraar in the national capital and all these films turned out to be some of the most special films in my filmography and gave me tremendous recognition that I’m grateful for.”

He added, “So, I’m excited to be back in Delhi to shoot my next and I hope that Delhi will add its magical touch and make this film again a stand-out one for my career in cinema.”

Arjun, who is on a strict diet as he continues his physical transformation, is looking forward to his cheat day when he can gorge on the Delhi delicacies.

Arjun said, “Since I’m very fitness-forward these days and want to achieve a certain body type soon, I won’t be able to gorge on the Delhi delicacies but I have convinced my trainer to allow me a day of cheat meals in Delhi.”

He also shared, “I am waiting for the day when I can have my Bua’s Ghar ka khana and the local chaat. I’m looking forward to this outdoor schedule in Delhi where I can relive my childhood summer holidays and enjoy my cheat and treat meal and spend time with my family here.”

Arjun and Bhumi will also be seen in director Ajay Bahl’s upcoming film ‘The Ladykiller’.

Apart from that, Arjun also has a dark comedy ‘Kuttey’ alongside actors Tabu, Naseeruddin Shah, and Radhika Madan in his kitty which is all set to hit the theatres in January 2023. (ANI)

Read More: http://13.232.95.176/

Pakeezah – The Courtesan’s Classic

What can one say about a film that took 16 years to make, its genre no longer popular when released, and its main attraction looking jaded, only a sad reminder of her resplendent beauty?

Well, you can say that despite these and numerous other debilities, it remains a classic that has grown with time. Fifty years after its release, Pakeezah (The Pure) continues to be viewed and debated by the discerning in the new century.

India was in a triumphant mood after the 1971 war when Pakeezah was released on February 2, 1972. People had no stomach for its deep melancholia. Romantic and opulent historical and “Muslim socials” of 1950s-60s (with notable exceptions Shatranj Ke Khiladi-1977, Junoon-1979 and Umrao Jaan-1981) were yielding place to contemporary themes. The “angry young man” was knocking at the cinema door.

After many expensive fits and starts, writer-director Kamal Amrohi barely managed to complete filming Meena Kumari, his estranged wife and muse. Both knew she was dying. Despite its rich artistic content and popular songs, Pakeezah flopped commercially. It marked the end of a life-time dream. Until…

Re-released after Meena Kumari died, just eight weeks later, on March 31, it stormed the cinema theatres. Not only were the fortunes revived and the fame restored, Pakeezah and Mena Kumari became synonymous. They overshadow her earlier acting triumphs and for that matter, also Amrohi’s outstanding films, with and without her.

Although it loses out in most departments except in music, Pakeezah often gets compared with Mughal-e-Azam (1960), a magnificent story of another bygone era, arguably one of the greatest films ever made in India.

ALSO READ: Unparalleled Reign Of Mughal e Azam

Many stories, real, apocryphal, even autobiographical, fuelled the making of both the films. Amrohi, appointed as one of the four writers for Mughal-e-Azam, abandoned Pakezaah because both had similar themes drawn from the Anarkali legend. Separated for five years from wife, he considered replacement. But he couldn’t imagine Pakeezah without Meena Kumari, and gave up again. Friends Nargis and Sunil Dutt helped their patch-up.

To lighten his burden, Amrohi engaged Satyen Bose, but couldn’t quit direction. Signing writers Akhtar-ul-Iman and Madhusudan led to disputes. He had to pay a fine to disengage with the latter. So, no Pakeezah without Amrohi as well.

The film’s German cinematographer, Joseph Wirsching, died in 1967. Technology switch was needed from Black & White to Eastmancolor. Composer Ghulam Mohammad died, requiring Naushad to complete the soundtrack, finally ‘arranged’ by Kersi Lord.

Pakeezah is the story of a tawaif, a courtesan. Unable to marry her lover Shahabuddin, she begets a girl-child before dying. Her sister Nawabjaan raises the child, grooms her as a dancer. The love story repeats, this time between Sahibjaan and Salim, a forest officer, also a nephew of Shahabuddin.

Family patriarch, common to both situations, rejects Sahibjaan. He shoots Shahabuddin who, shamed by Nawabjaan, wants to redeem himself. After this blood-letting, Salim has his way. He marries Sahibjaan, his Pakeezah. A poignant ending with justice, a rarity, for a courtesan.

Thanks to frustrating time-loss in production, Ashok Kumar, signed to play Salim, grown old, had to play Shahbuddin. From ‘stars’ of the day — Dharmendra, Raaj Kumar, Rajendra Kumar, Sunil Dutt, and Pradeep Kumar – Amrohi chose Dharmendra as Salim. But well into shooting, he found the wife getting on “too well” with Dharmendra, enough to distract filming. There were rumours galore. The possessive husband-director dropped Dharmendra.

It was finally Raaj Kumar. He sees Sahibjaan sleeping on a moving train. Smitten, he leaves a note between her foot thumb and finger: “Aapke paon dekhe, bahut haseen hain. Inhein zameen par mat utariyega… maile ho jaayenge” (Your feet are really beautiful. Do not step on the ground… lest they be soiled). The dialogue is rated as one of the most romantic/erotic scenes in Indian cinema.

When released, the courtesan culture, the kothas of Lucknow et al, were passé. Not that there was no room for romanticism. But India was ready for another theme, Garam Hawa (Hot Winds-1973), about the plight of a Muslim businessman and his family, in the aftermath of the 1947 Partition. Only a year separated it from Pakeezah.

However, these “hot winds” couldn’t dampen the romance of Pakeezah and its songs. They also blew across the border from an aspiring India to a just-truncated Pakistan. Thankfully, Pakeezah helped a catharsis between the neighbours.

End-1972, I witnessed an India-Pakistan border “flag meeting”. A Pakistan Army officer, with roots in India’s Moradabad, half-seriously urged his Indian counterparts tasked to remove the explosives on the minefield, to “leave one mine only to be cleared by me, with a gramophone record of Pakeezah songs concealed underneath”.

India’s Doordarshan telecast Pakeezah from its Amritsar centre on September 29, 1973. Columnist Ibn-e-Imroze wrote in Daily Imroze: “The day Pakeezah was televised, Lahore cinemas wore a deserted look. Black-marketers sold their tickets even below the face value. Lahorewallahs had resisted (India’s) 1965 and 1971 attacks, but surrendered to this invasion of 1973. People invaded TV shops. Those who could not get one, fixed bamboo antennae on the roofs of their houses (to watch direct telecast), to console their frustrated feelings. Traffic came to a halt, pockets were picked, even doctors said to their patients: ‘If you remain alive till then, I’ll see you tomorrow. Today I am going to see Pakeezah’.”

To anyone with an ear for music, the film’s pull is undeniable. Among those gems, alas, Inhin Logon Ne seems plagiarised. It can be heard on Youtube in Shamshad Begum’s voice, sung for a 1941 film Himmat. The lyric is by Aziz.

Film analyst Gautam Kaul writes: Majrooh Sultanpuri had stolen the lyric from Aziz for Ghulam Mohammed, a contemporary of Pandit Gobind Ram, the original composer from the Lahore School.

Cut to 1972. Kaul notes: “It is the same kotha, the same assembly of men, the same musical score, the same song, the same Kathak style, but it is Technicolour, and a bloated Meena Kumari, with leathered skin due to constant drinking, is attempting to dance. The dancing isn’t a patch on the rendition by the light-footed young actress Manorama in the original.”

Truth be told, Meena Kumari was too sick to dance. She was filmed sitting. Padma Khanna performed all her dance movements, not credited to any choreographer.

None of these prevented the film’s earning five times the sum spent on production. Its soundtracks sold the best across Asia and topped the popularity charts of Radio Ceylon’s Binaca Geetmala, then a decisive benchmark.

Chalte Chalte, “Aaj hum apni duaon ka asar and Thaade rahiyo, for which she designed the costumes, remain the most memorable song-and-dance performances. A storm of protests from the film fraternity damned Filmfare that denied awards to Pakeezah because its leading contenders were dead.

In 2005, the British academic Rachel Dwyer called Mena Kumari’s character a “quintessentially romantic figure: a beautiful but tragic woman, who pours out her grief for the love she is denied in tears, poetry and dance.”

Meena Kumari’s fee for acting in Pakeezah was one sovereign gold coin. Kamal Amrohi gave that to his dying wife. She clutched it till she passed away, never able to see it or the released film. Pakeezah was truly, Meena Kumari’s film.

The writer can be reached at mahendraved07@gmail.com

Covid Restrictions on Movie Halls

‘OTT Platforms, TV Can Never Replace Theatre Experience’

Milee Banerjee, a movie buff from Kolkata, is happy that Covid restrictions on movie halls have been lifted and the audience is taking all precautions

If you want to know how much my family and I love movies, let me disclose that my father named me Milee after Jaya Bachchan’s famous movie by the same name. It is my father who instilled a love for movies in me. We ‘bonded’ the most over Bond flicks. And it was a Bond movie – Daniel Craig’s swan song No Time To Die – that I went to watch along with my friends as soon as the Covid restrictions on theatres were lifted in Kolkata.

It was such a thrilling experience to be entering the theatres after what felt like decades, though it was only a 1.5 years’ gap. It was as sentimental as going to the theatres for the first time in my life with my family, or watching cult classics like Jurassic Park or Hum Aapke Hain Kaun with them. The theatre management had taken total care to follow Covid regulations and the place was spic and span. The seating arrangements were such that there was a gap of one seat.

Given this arrangement, I would say a large number of people turned out once the theatres reopened. The audience were also following all regulations. The whole movie watching experience was smooth and delightful one I would say. Oh, and most importantly, surprisingly the price of tickets didn’t increase by much.

Banerjee (with actor Makrand Deshpande and director Anurag Basu) is a fan of action and horror movies

I am an action movies/ horror genre fan and such movies make sense mostly in theatres with their special effects and surround sound systems. It makes you forget time. Moreover, you can’t pause the movies in theatres at will, unlike on your phone or laptop, so you focus on each scene completely, thus respecting the work of the cast and the crew involved.

The second movie that I watched in theatres was Venom and I went alone for this one. I have always been comfortable going to the theatres alone and feel that post pandemic other people should get comfortable with the idea too. Sometimes a movie is the best way to lift your mood and as the pandemic has shown us, life is too precious to not watch the kind of movies you like. Live life to the fullest, even if you don’t find others who enjoy the same genre as you.

ALSO READ: ‘Street Food Lovers Are Back With A Vengeance’

The pandemic has brought about major changes in how we handle many important areas of our lives, be it travel, education, healthcare and even entertainment. The OTT platform literally exploded during the pandemic, for entertainment (or the arts) can help soothe our frayed nerves when everything is uncertain, ease loneliness and even give us hope for the future.

Sometimes immersing yourself in a movie or series is the best way to shut oneself from the gloom and doom of news. I bought subscriptions to two streaming services and immersed myself into the small screens of my phone/laptop. But I was still missing the surround sound experience we get in theatres. Plus, when others in the audience clap, laugh or cry you feel connected at a human level. I watched The Red Notice starring my favourite Gal Gadot & Dwayne Johnson, and of course Ryan Reynolds on my phone. I wish I could have watched that one in the theatres too, but I didn’t have time.

A single movie can bring people out of a gloomy mood and a single actor’s words can make the public follow guidelines they otherwise wouldn’t. But the audience’s role has also widened. More people have now begun appreciating good cinema, because the lockdown gave them some great quality content. Mindless entertainment is on its way out.